#FreeSpurlock

[Stan]

What Pete wrote was wrong because he should have written "not all".

There is a definite trend of lefties making excuses for and covering up crimes from the Pakistani Muslim community.
Not all of course.

Well done. That's why I think he's a bigot. He comes out with stuff like that and then backtracks saying he doesn't mean all of them before spamming the Politics thread with non political articles about crimes committed by brown doctors. Here are some examples.

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-6160#post-11950853

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-4930#post-11703743

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-3301#post-11259058

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-6134#post-11942383

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-5145#post-11750647

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-2957#post-11160154

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-2905#post-11137409

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-2627#post-11054790

 

[DUNCAN DONUTS]

I'm not sure what I've supposedly missed or ignored?

You said the anti-Pete lot were calling for action ages back, then moaned when action was taken (which included against them). I said they should've been told to man up from the beginning or stick Pete on ignore.

Aside from that, the general topic I've been talking about is simply just to not ban/ restrict posts on the Prem board and that if people want a politics thread free from abuse, then create one where there's more guidelines and rules in place. Let this place be the free-for-all section.

Some posters only go on that thread to call Pete a fat racist nonce .
He ended up ignoring them all and they still carried on even though they knew he wouldn't read it or respond.
The thread without abuse is much better.

 

[DMD]

They used to have politics threads but then decided on a non politics rule.

However, not before Saxton had been royally sussed for what he is.

https://www.not606.com/threads/paris-again.316068/page-16

Wrong again stumpy. It's a long standing no politics no religion rule, with exceptions for significant events.

Pete still posts on the Hull board.

 

[DMD]

Some posters only go on that thread to call Pete a fat racist nonce .
He ended up ignoring them all and they still carried on even though they knew he wouldn't read it or respond.
The thread without abuse is much better.

This thread is a good example of what that thread was. Pete's not even on here.

 

[DUNCAN DONUTS]

Well done. That's why I think he's a bigot. He comes out with stuff like that and then backtracks saying he doesn't mean all of them before spamming the Politics thread with non political articles about crimes committed by brown doctors. Here are some examples.

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-6160#post-11950853

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-4930#post-11703743

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-3301#post-11259058

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-6134#post-11942383

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-5145#post-11750647

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-2957#post-11160154

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-2905#post-11137409

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-2627#post-11054790

The guy that drove into people in Westminster was a Sudanese refugee , pointing out this is not racist.
All of those stories Saxton linked to of brown people coming to the UK and commiting crime are real and it puts people off being so welcoming .

 

[Tobes]

Wrong again stumpy. It's a long standing no politics no religion rule, with exceptions for significant events.

Pete still posts on the Hull board.

Semantics, there’s been political threads in the past as I’ve just shown.

I didn’t say he never posted on the Hull board, so wrong again dipshit.

He’s posted about Hull City a handful of times in months btw.

 

[DUNCAN DONUTS]

Semantics, there’s been political threads in the past as I’ve just shown.

I didn’t say he never posted on the Hull board, so wrong again dipshit.

He’s posted about Hull City a handful of times in months btw.

You are a bit stalky.

You even know I'm off to Spain from reading my comments on GC which is quite creepy.

 

[DMD]

Semantics, there’s been political threads in the past as I’ve just shown.

I didn’t say he never posted on the Hull board, so wrong again dipshit.

He’s posted about Hull City a handful of times in months btw.

It's not semantics, you're simply wrong. It's a safe bet I know far more about it than you.

I seem to recall the other mods on there banned you, and I requested it that the ban was removed, and got you back on, so you're probably not all that clued up on the goings on there, but perhaps a bit bitter, as you've shown you don't take such things very well, no matter how justified they are.

 

[Star of David Bardsley]

Wrong again stumpy. It's a long standing no politics no religion rule, with exceptions for significant events.

Pete still posts on the Hull board.

It’s the no noncing rule that did for you and Pete.

 

[Tobes]

It's not semantics, you're simply wrong. It's a safe bet I know far more about it than you.

I seem to recall the other mods on there banned you, and I requested it that the ban was removed, so you're probably not all that clued up on the goings on there.

It is semantics, as there’s been political threads on there before and you have a no politics rule, so you obviously make exceptions -like the one I quoted.

Brb lifted my ban, at my request. Cheers.

 

[Stan]

The guy that drove into people in Westminster was a Sudanese refugee , pointing out this is not racist.
All of those stories Saxton linked to of brown people coming to the UK and commiting crime are real and it puts people off being so welcoming .

I’ve no idea why you’ve included your first sentence, we covered that kind of comment in a previous exchange. You’re labouring a point we agree on.

With regards to defending his addiction to articles about brown doctors you’re either being naive or disingenuous. He’s actively defended Tory MPs for being nonces while he seemingly spends hours trawling the net for articles about brown criminals. Occasionally he’ll also post about Eastern European criminals. He seems to have little to no interest in crimes committed by white British folk. Why do you think that is?

 

[NSIS]

Getting bored with this now.

In my view this board should remain unmoderated, and especially should not be modded on just one thread.

Various sneaky grasses seem to finally have gotten their way and possibly the worst choice of mod in the history of world forums was installed. Dull!

Most finally came around to the idea of limiting personal insults on that or thread, thst was until the aforementioned mod decided to exhibit his bias and prejudice in his modding.

Most probably nothing will ever be done about this iniquitous situation, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t keep pointing out the situation.

 

[DMD]

It is semantics, as there’s been political threads on there before and you have a no politics rule, so you obviously make exceptions -like the one I quoted.

Brb lifted my ban, at my request. Cheers.

Your ban being lifted was after I stepped in as your own requests were ignored. Brb rarely, if ever lifts a ban without speaking to the appropriate mods first.

It's not sematics, well on my part at least, you are quite simply wrong, because you have little idea what actually goes on.

 

[Stan]

Getting bored with this now.

In my view this board should remain unmoderated, and especially should not be modded on just one thread.

Various sneaky grasses seem to finally have gotten their way and possibly the worst choice of mod in the history of world forums was installed. Dull!

Most finally came around to the idea of limiting personal insults on that or thread, thst was until the aforementioned mod decided to exhibit his bias and prejudice in his modding.

Most probably nothing will ever be done about this iniquitous situation, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t keep pointing out the situation.

brb can’t sack him off as that would be too much of a climb down so basically the board’s ****ed.

 

[Blueman]

Nobody I know ever complained about abuse on any thread.

If anybody complained it would have been one of the usual sneaky grasses, like Fatty.

If he wasn’t such an utter **** and, insulted other posters himself, he wouldn’t have got the abuse back.

We've had the odd banter, wouldn't call it abuse. Even so, it's only words so **** it.

 

[Stan]

Your ban being lifted was after I stepped in as your own requests were ignored. Brb rarely, if ever lifts a ban without speaking to the appropriate mods first.

It's not sematics, well on my part at least, you are quite simply wrong, because you have little idea what actually goes on.

You said it wasn’t you who requested Tobes’ ban so why would he consider you to be the “appropriate mod” to discuss it with? Bit insulting to the Hull mod who banned him.

 

[Blueman]

Kustard likes to have a moan to the mods. The ****ing snowflake!

You can expect a car park invitation after that little remark, young man

 

[Star of David Bardsley]

You said it wasn’t you who requested Tobes’ ban so why would he consider you to be the “appropriate mod” to discuss it with? Bit insulting to the Hull mod who banned him.

It’s only fair he was involved after sacrificing a weekend to monitor the togs.

 

[DMD]

We've had the odd banter, wouldn't call it abuse. Even so, it's only words so **** it.

As those whining know, it's not just the abuse, and the easiest way to get brb to change his mind is to prove moderation isn't needed. The bullshit on threads like these show some are a long way from that.

 

[DUNCAN DONUTS]

I’ve no idea why you’ve included your first sentence, we covered that kind of comment in a previous exchange. You’re labouring a point we agree on.

With regards to defending his addiction to articles about brown doctors you’re either being naive or disingenuous. He’s actively defended Tory MPs for being nonces while he seemingly spends hours trawling the net for articles about brown criminals. Occasionally he’ll also post about Eastern European criminals. He seems to have little to no interest in crimes committed by white British folk. Why do you think that is?

Over 80% of us in the UK are white British and they will commit a majority of crime.
When refugees flee their countries to be given a new life in the UK and turn out to be rapists or murderers that's newsworthy.

Nearly all the murders in London this year were commited by people with brown faces .

Clearly Saxton has an unhealthy appetite for stories about violent criminals of a certain colour but if they weren't commiting so much crime there would be no story.