#FreeSpurlock

For some reason some on the left would rather young girls get raped and trafficked than offend the Pakistani Muslim community.
That’s not what he said.

This is: "lefties love muslims because they abuse young girls
it's what muslims do and the left want to make sure they are happy"

Do you agree with the statement? Let's break it down.

"Lefties love muslims": I doubt all "lefties" love muslims although we'd need to define "lefties". He's called me a crazed leftie numerous times and I've never voted Labour.

"Lefties love muslims because they abuse young girls": so he's saying that the reason "lefties" love muslims is because muslims abuse young girls. "Lefties" like the fact that muslims abuse young girls. I doubt this is true.

"it's what muslims do": do you agree that all muslims abuse young girls?

"and the left want to make sure they're happy": so he believes that "lefties" like muslims abusing young girls as they want the muslims to be happy. This is of course the mind thought of someone who should be assessed and possibly sectioned.

@DUNCAN DONUTS your comments welcome. I will happily have a sensible discussion about his comment.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Nope .

In 2004 the Czech republic joined the EU as a result they could live and work in the UK.

Training schools funded by multi million pound Casino operators from the UK told the Czech people that they could earn up to £20k to live and work in London which is probably triple the average wage there.
When they arrived they soon discovered that the croupiers inspectors pit bosses and managers earnt much much more than that and £20k is not a considerable amount of money compared to the cost of living back home.

Anyone over a certain salary was up for redundancy and within a year 80% of the staff were East Europeans probably halving the wage budget in 2 years.

I took a settlement and joined a better company a few months later.

The point being the EU has driven down salaries in the gaming industry.
It used to be a very highly paid job as a London croupier and still is in some clubs.

I haven't dealt in years I was an inspector training officer and pit boss.


Croupiers and pit bosses weren't on more than £20k before 2004 were they?

Werent allowed to keep tips until a few years later iirc
 
:emoticon-0138-think :emoticon-0138-think

See, that ^^^^^ is the level of desperate attention seeking bullshit that pervaded the other thread. :emoticon-0102-bigsm

Pete's more than accepted on the Hull board, that has a no politics, no religion rule.

I do believe the mods on there banned Stan for being a prick.

I wasn't quick enough, I was referring to Stand pile of bollocks, that you like for 'balance' presumably. :emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
Croupiers and pit bosses weren't on more than £20k before 2004 were they?

Werent allowed to keep tips until a few years later iirc
Ask your mate the GM of the Grosvenor near you .

My first job in London in 2000 with less than 3 years experience was way more than £20k a year.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
For some reason some on the left would rather young girls get raped and trafficked than offend the Pakistani Muslim community.
Pathetic attempt at false equivalence. Do you not accept that comment was racist?
 
There seems to be a lot of anger about a poster that's not banned and a thread nobody's blocked from. :emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
And there we have it duncs favourite subject/s
Yep that's how it works Stan tags me and asks me to comment about Pete banging on about Muslim rapists ,I respond and of course it's me bringing this stuff up again .


You think that Saxton is a terrorist and Abu Hamza isn't because he wasn't in prison when you used to hang out with him.

I would not be surprised if you are on a terrorist watch list for socialising with 3 of the worst terrorists in the UK .
 
:emoticon-0138-think :emoticon-0138-think

See, that ^^^^^ is the level of desperate attention seeking bullshit that pervaded the other thread. :emoticon-0102-bigsm

Pete's more than accepted on the Hull board, that has a no politics, no religion rule.

I do believe the mods on there banned Stan for being a prick.

I wasn't quick enough, I was referring to Stand pile of bollocks, that you like for 'balance' presumably. :emoticon-0102-bigsm
I may be wrong about the politics thread on the Hull board. I haven't been able to post on there or in the tags since you got me a ban.

There are some corking comments about Saxton from the other Hull posters though! <laugh>
 
Yep that's how it works Stan tags me and asks me to comment about Pete banging on about Muslim rapists ,I respond and of course it's me bringing this stuff up again .


You think that Saxton is a terrorist and Abu Hamza isn't because he wasn't in prison when you used to hang out with him.

I would not be surprised if you are on a terrorist watch list for socialising with 3 of the worst terrorists in the UK .
In fairness to you, I'd welcome your comment on what he posted.
 
Yep that's how it works Stan tags me and asks me to comment about Pete banging on about Muslim rapists ,I respond and of course it's me bringing this stuff up again .


You think that Saxton is a terrorist and Abu Hamza isn't because he wasn't in prison when you used to hang out with him.

I would not be surprised if you are on a terrorist watch list for socialising with 3 of the worst terrorists in the UK .


How can I be if I was arguing against them??

You dont get this do you? Let me simplify it for you

Pete links extreme right wingers, you express Joy and likes for this and cone up with your own

Since extreme right wing, under prevent after 2014, is included in terrorism it's pete and you that are at risk

Add to that both of yours penchant for all things rapey and child abuse , if I was you I'd leave the chain off door and leave the balcony (balcony :emoticon-0136-giggl) unlocked
 
That’s not what he said.

This is: "lefties love muslims because they abuse young girls
it's what muslims do and the left want to make sure they are happy"

Do you agree with the statement? Let's break it down.

"Lefties love muslims": I doubt all "lefties" love muslims although we'd need to define "lefties". He's called me a crazed leftie numerous times and I've never voted Labour.

"Lefties love muslims because they abuse young girls": so he's saying that the reason "lefties" love muslims is because muslims abuse young girls. "Lefties" like the fact that muslims abuse young girls. I doubt this is true.

"it's what muslims do": do you agree that all muslims abuse young girls?

"and the left want to make sure they're happy": so he believes that "lefties" like muslims abusing young girls as they want the muslims to be happy. This is of course the mind thought of someone who should be assessed and possibly sectioned.

@DUNCAN DONUTS your comments welcome. I will happily have a sensible discussion about his comment.
What Pete wrote was wrong because he should have written "not all".

There is a definite trend of lefties making excuses for and covering up crimes from the Pakistani Muslim community.
Not all of course.
 
Ask your mate the GM of the Grosvenor near you .

My first job in London in 2000 with less than 3 years experience was way more than £20k a year.


My mates would have been on more than you, their jobs are not easily filled by non English speaking immigrants after a weeks training

So a starting croupier was on more than £20k in 2000? <laugh>
 
How can I be if I was arguing against them??

You dont get this do you? Let me simplify it for you

Pete links extreme right wingers, you express Joy and likes for this and cone up with your own

Since extreme right wing, under prevent after 2014, is included in terrorism it's pete and you that are at risk

Add to that both of yours penchant for all things rapey and child abuse , if I was you I'd leave the chain off door and leave the balcony (balcony :emoticon-0136-giggl) unlocked
Ok imagine this scenario.

I used to knock about with Anders Brevik a few years ago , he cooks a mean lasagne and we used to go out clubbing in Norway .
I am also friends with Paul Golding I agree with him on certain issues and we often argue about religeon and politics .

Same with Darren Osbourne great guy and a real laugh when he's out on the piss.




Now just because I know these 3 controversial guys does that make me a racist or terrorist?

No it's me that used to keep Brevik in check I deserve a medal for deradicalising him really.
 
This bit's not that bad, it's more like a sixth form reunion, and you seem to be ignoring the bits I've posted about the hows and why's, and that it's not just the abuse, but other issues at play.

I'm not sure what I've supposedly missed or ignored?

You said the anti-Pete lot were calling for action ages back, then moaned when action was taken (which included against them). I said they should've been told to man up from the beginning or stick Pete on ignore.

Aside from that, the general topic I've been talking about is simply just to not ban/ restrict posts on the Prem board and that if people want a politics thread free from abuse, then create one where there's more guidelines and rules in place. Let this place be the free-for-all section.
 
I may be wrong about the politics thread on the Hull board. I haven't been able to post on there or in the tags since you got me a ban.

There are some corking comments about Saxton from the other Hull posters though! <laugh>
They used to have politics threads but then decided on a non politics rule.

However, not before Saxton had been royally sussed for what he is.

https://www.not606.com/threads/paris-again.316068/page-16
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD and Stan
My mates would have been on more than you, their jobs are not easily filled by non English speaking immigrants after a weeks training

So a starting croupier was on more than £20k in 2000? <laugh>
You get paid more in London than up North you ****ing idiot .<doh>

You know absolutely **** all .<somersault>
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD