#FreeSpurlock

Yeah your lie about you potentially forgetting whether you’d banned Saxton or not, was a ****ing beauty.

You being ignorant of events, doesn't mean it's a lie, it just means you're ignorant. :emoticon-0105-wink:
 
Can this thread be renamed as Bernard Manning v Roy Chubby Brown?

It did get renamed something similar, but changed back to prevent cruelty to the toys falling out of prams, so perhaps it's best not to. :emoticon-0102-bigsm

[HASHTAG]#bantz[/HASHTAG] but only one way. :emoticon-0105-wink:
 
And yet the posters that were actually banned the most, are virtually silent.

You've said you don't read that thread, you didn't need to say that, it's obvious you're only basing your views on the very selective, almost to the point of fantasy versions of the huffy and indigent set.

That's their prerogative, just like it is of those who get banned that then wanna moan about it.

What views have I got other than saying people shouldn't be banned? I'm not taking anyone's side, just merely saying that no one should be banned. If people want a less abusive politics thread then surely it'd be much more worthwhile going to a stricter, less aggressive and less abusive board?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Quesadaad
That's their prerogative, just like it is of those who get banned that then wanna moan about it.

What views have I got other than saying people shouldn't be banned? I'm not taking anyone's side, just merely saying that no one should be banned. If people want a less abusive politics thread then surely it'd be much more worthwhile going to a stricter, less aggressive and less abusive board?

Perhaps, but those now whinging, are the ones previously wanting the action when they received a bit back. Those being abused just cracked on. As I said, at the end of the day, they're hissy about one solitary thread out of all the otheravailable threads that they're free to ignore. Ask yourself why they're unable to do that.

Be careful what you wish for.
 
That's their prerogative, just like it is of those who get banned that then wanna moan about it.

What views have I got other than saying people shouldn't be banned? I'm not taking anyone's side, just merely saying that no one should be banned. If people want a less abusive politics thread then surely it'd be much more worthwhile going to a stricter, less aggressive and less abusive board?


It doesn't matter what you say to him mate, he just wibble wobbles and posts nonsense hoping you will get tired and say "**** it" and then he can claim victory

Before my ban yesterday he said I was lying about what another poster had said. The poster himself said he said it and hence why dull is avoiding engaging with me today
 
Your definition of racist is not the same as most .

If I post "We don't want any more terrorists or rapists to be let into the UK".

This would be a sensible statement .
To you it's racism.
If I post "Another black guy has stabbed someone to death in London".
That is commenting on s trend of black knife criminals and not racist.
I don't think either of those comments are racist so please don't speak for me.

I think the following comment is bigoted and also the work of a deranged mind "lefties love muslims because they abuse young girls
it's what muslims do and the left want to make sure they are happy"

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-1983#post-10878585
 
It doesn't matter what you say to him mate, he just wibble wobbles and posts nonsense hoping you will get tired and say "**** it" and then he can claim victory

Before my ban yesterday he said I was lying about what another poster had said. The poster himself said he said it and hence why dull is avoiding engaging with me today
Yep, he lied again. Which is why he’s been deleted the posts since he took over that thread, so they couldn’t be referenced to prove his lies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thefanwithnoname
That's their prerogative, just like it is of those who get banned that then wanna moan about it.

What views have I got other than saying people shouldn't be banned? I'm not taking anyone's side, just merely saying that no one should be banned. If people want a less abusive politics thread then surely it'd be much more worthwhile going to a stricter, less aggressive and less abusive board?
Just FYI, he's teeing himself up for the weekend when he likes to post solidly throughout the day and into the early hours. It will be about his 110th in a row.

Now that his thread is a bit quiet he has to work to get a slanging match going to get him through the lonely 48 hours.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thefanwithnoname
Yep, he lied again. Which is why he’s been deleted the posts since he took over that thread, so they couldn’t be referenced to prove his lies.

You do spout some bollocks based on bullshit like that from the fantasist you're replying to there. :emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
That's their prerogative, just like it is of those who get banned that then wanna moan about it.

What views have I got other than saying people shouldn't be banned? I'm not taking anyone's side, just merely saying that no one should be banned. If people want a less abusive politics thread then surely it'd be much more worthwhile going to a stricter, less aggressive and less abusive board?
Colin Lee demanded retribution for Saxton implying that he works with vulnerable children because he's a sex pest .
Saxton was banned then asked why it was ok for him to be called a nonce by other posters.
As a result everyone was told not to call Saxton names .
Now nobody is allowed to be abusive on that one thread.
You could move the thread to another board but that seems a bit daft, the people that can't control themselves should post on Tobes politics thread and leave the rest to engage in civil discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
Nobody I know ever complained about abuse on any thread.

If anybody complained it would have been one of the usual sneaky grasses, like Fatty.

If he wasn’t such an utter **** and, insulted other posters himself, he wouldn’t have got the abuse back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Yep, he lied again. Which is why he’s been deleted the posts since he took over that thread, so they couldn’t be referenced to prove his lies.


He plain out said I had lied when a) Pete repeated it asmitti g he said it and b) I cut and pasted it <laugh>

Yet if you look at what he is saying you'd think he was this over worked , neutral pillar of Justice <laugh><laugh>
 
Perhaps, but those now whinging, are the ones previously wanting the action when they received a bit back. Those being abused just cracked on.
Be careful what you wish for.

And like I said in another post, those who moaned should've been told to man up, they know what they're getting into on this part of the forum. It's like going to a MMA fight and asking the fighters not to hurt one another. It's stupid.
 
Colin Lee demanded retribution for Saxton implying that he works with vulnerable children because he's a sex pest .
Saxton was banned then asked why it was ok for him to be called a nonce by other posters.
As a result everyone was told not to call Saxton names .
Now nobody is allowed to be abusive on that one thread.
You could move the thread to another board but that seems a bit daft, the people that can't control themselves should post on Tobes politics thread and leave the rest to engage in civil discussion.

And the line was drawn at that point in time, making some of the whingers defence meaningless.