mate the neutral mod said iIwas lying and Pete hadn't said anything yesterday even when I cut and paste of what he had said#FreeSpurlock
- Thread starter Libby
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
mate the neutral mod said iIwas lying and Pete hadn't said anything yesterday even when I cut and paste of what he had said
Boom
There goes your sense of humour too.
What happens to your sense of humour when likes of me get "edgy" back?
Saxton is racist. Pixie isn’t. It’s that straightforward.
He posts about criminals and lots of criminals have brown faces.
It's not racist to post stories about brown faced criminals.
It's inconvenient to the Drs and engineers narrative every time a brown faced guy stabs someone tries to run someone over or throws acid on people.
Saxton said Africans were animals and should go back to Africa
Saxton said Muslims abuse children
In both cases they were general comments, he wasn’t referring to specific groups.
You know full well that he’s a very bigoted old failure.
They don't like facts mate
Saxton said I had a terrorists profile, .I laughed and said I hadn't posted links etc to any such thing yet he is constantly posting extreme right wing links and after 2014 prevent included extreme right wingers as terrorists
Dmd saw that as me insulting Pete and being disruptive and banned me off the thread
It's not imbalance though because everyone generally understands the law of the Prem board - and that is there are no laws, as clichéd and petty as that may sound.
If one poster has multiple posters against them then tough ****. Plenty of us have been in those situations, when I wind up Chelsea/ Arsenal fans I'll have multiple guys hounding me out, likewise with Ginge/ Piskie when they wind up the Spurs fans. We all know what we're getting into. It's why we come on here. Pete obviously says stuff - racist or not - that rubs others up the wrong way, it doesn't mean people should be banned, nor should Pete be banned either, he's entitled to say what he wants but as with everyone else on here, if you know what you're going to say is likely to be controversial, whether that be football or politics related, or anything for the matter, then you can't not expect to get a barrage of abuse in return, it's naive.
The reason I see what you may feel is imbalanced information is because people are being banned and then moaning about it. If they weren't banned, I wouldn't be here saying what I'm saying.
You’ve not been around for the length of time he’s been posting on the succession of politics threads going back to before the referendum. He’s posted all kinds of racist comments of his own, together with retweeting made up racist jarg that he hadn’t bothered to check the veracity of, as he didn’t care.
Is linking extreme right wingers tweets FB etc a sign of having Right wing sympathies?
Your definition of racist is not the same as most .
If I post "We don't want any more terrorists or rapists to be let into the UK".
This would be a sensible statement .
To you it's racism.
If I post "Another black guy has stabbed someone to death in London".
That is commenting on a trend of black knife criminals and not racist.
And yet the posters that were actually banned the most, are virtually silent.
You've said you don't read that thread, you didn't need to say that, it's obvious you're only basing your views on the very selective, almost to the point of fantasy versions of the huffy and indigent set.