That's because you have it up your ownI said what i had to say mate, i dont have my head up anyone's arse unlike some here![]()
That's because you have it up your ownI said what i had to say mate, i dont have my head up anyone's arse unlike some here![]()
Like i said i dont agree with either of them doing it but it's just funny how people are selective here with what constitutes as fun and what isn't, whats out of order and what isn't depending on the user...i guess that's keyboard warriors for you..
That's because you have it up your own![]()

To much of a broad brush suffering , no two bans are the same and some are needed .... I've sat on the sidelines at times and Know I got what I deserved . 15 votes with none saying a ban was deserved speaks volumes on this event though .I know nothing of Hiag asking for bans, if he did, then I don't agree.
But what a Piskie did was completely out of order. He was well aware that Bod had agreed to Hiag tagging him, but still went and grassed him up, making out that he wasn't aware of what was going on.
As Sky says, he put his requests on here. He didn't go sneaking off to the mods behind everybody's back to do it.
If Bod hadn't bubbled him, nobody wouold have known. Which was obviously what Piskie was hoping for...

Isn't that a banning offence...?
I suspect it'll be calm for a few days before the storm hits on Thursday mateI think the storm is at least a few days away personally![]()
![]()
After you snide.fair's fair....someone needs to ban Skiddy for 2 weeks now.

If they were banning people for that there would be no one here.Skiddy, for being a ****.
And majority of those voters back hiag unconditionally, speaks volumes hey!To much of a broad brush suffering , no two bans are the same and some are needed .... I've sat on the sidelines at times and Know I got what I deserved . 15 votes with none saying a ban was deserved speaks volumes on this event though .
Come on Luv dont say things likethat otherwise the victim card cant be played here....Only because he can't
And again, If given enough clues...
And
It speaks volumes about you, that you are all over this board backing a grass up.And majority of those voters back hiag unconditionally, speaks volumes hey!
I see, so you would rather back someone unconditionally who does animal porn on here and makes a twat of himselfIt speaks volumes about you, that you are all over this board backing a grass up.
I wouldn't dare.

As Sky says, he put his requests on here. He didn't go sneaking off to the mods behind everybody's back to do it.
If Bod hadn't bubbled him, nobody wouold have known. Which was obviously what Piskie was hoping for...
Actually hiag did PM mods first if i recall to ban people and then tagging the mods to do it, we only this because brb told the board and took the piss out of him....but somehow that's different though..make of it what like.Polly would have known...
Personally I'm against bans unless the circumstances are extreme...but I don't get that asking for bans for other posters on here somehow carries the morale high ground ..it doesn't rule our PMs and is surely just another form of 'snitching' if a supermod is tagged to get them to act?
Surely thats better than trying to shove it up hiag's like youThat's because you have it up your own![]()

Hiag will be back and will use his time away to come up with more **** to stir.
Was Saintsfan also banned as he hasn't appeared since Hiag's ban.
It appears Piskie was more effective at getting Hiag banned than Hiag's multi attempts to get Piskie banned.
Strange how all Hiag's harem seem to have forgotten that Hiag asked brb to ban Piskie and others during an epic meltdown



And majority of those voters back hiag unconditionally, speaks volumes hey!