Due to Lallana not marking the Fulham right back.
Pains me to say it, but if we're in situations where we feel it necessary to lift a flair player in order to give the flanks more defense cover, that player should be Lallana.
Due to Lallana not marking the Fulham right back.
Pains me to say it, but if we're in situations where we feel it necessary to lift a flair player in order to give the flanks more defense cover, that player should be Lallana.
Puncheon provided epic cover today for Yoshida. Huge mistake taking him off
Fully agree. Was actually putting in tackles, unlike Chaplow. Punch was very impressive.
Due to Lallana not marking the Fulham right back.
Lallana has four assists this season now (same as Mata) so I'd quite like him to keep doing what he's doing. If you want Saints to be a free-flowing attacking side that scores lots of goals and is nice to watch, then you have to accept that midfielders will occasionally abandon defensive duties for more free-roaming attacking roles. Alternatively, we could play a flat 4 in midfield with more rigid wingers and play like England. I know which one I'd prefer.
Lallana left him woefully exposed at times today. Still a few Hollywood passes nut he had a solid game today
Fully agree. Was actually putting in tackles, unlike Chaplow. Punch was very impressive.
His set piece work is good but he does loose the plot on occasions in defence and doesn't track runners.
Look where the crosses came from for their goals
Due to Lallana not marking the Fulham right back.
Everyone is saying how great a game he had but a full backs role in the team to close the crosses of the winger out. We conceded two goals from our left flank today both from crosses into the box. He was nowhere near tight enough on either occasion.
Due to Lallana not marking the Fulham right back.
Chaplow was ****.
Mistakenly, I was caught by a wave of nostalgia when I read that. Denis was an LB too.![]()
Well spotted CBK, both goals came when Adam had done a disappearing act and had ceased backing Foxy up.