Sod the kids. Send them out to work at 15.
*Yes it's official No7 is having a [HASHTAG]#DryJanuary[/HASHTAG] induced meltdown.
Me too. Off to my local for the customary non-alcoholic drink
Sod the kids. Send them out to work at 15.
*Yes it's official No7 is having a [HASHTAG]#DryJanuary[/HASHTAG] induced meltdown.
We clearly had an offer for him hence his Europa exclusion. He clearly knows about it hence rejecting improved terms and now handing in a transfer request. I'm firmly in the "If they don't want to be here let them go" camp so I would have forced the issue to reach a resolution. My point about it being used to stop another transfer was purely in response to suggestions that the fans would have gone batshit crazy if YET ANOTHER departure happened this summer. Clearly keeping a disgruntled Fonte has backfired. That in a nutshell is my entire point.What do you mean, us letting Fonte go in the last two weeks of the window could have stopped what transfer? Mane, Wanyama? Van Dijk this summer/summer after?
Unless I've missed something your solution to our problem of our captain and club legend wanting a transfer (And to a select few clubs, not just wanting to leave full stop) is just to have actively tried to sell him, meaning selling him for a poor price to whomever takes him. Surely you can see that is not a solution to any of our problems, given the whole battle over our image as a 'selling club'. How does that stop any transfers rather than completely undermine our bargaining power with players and clubs? The only possible upside to that mad powerplay is Fonte and Mendes somehow weakly buckling and accepting a new contract.
The (realistic) options I can see are:
Refuse to let him leave, no contract offer.
Refuse to let him leave, club-friendly contract offer.
Refuse to let him leave, player-friendly contract offer.
Set his price where we want it for anyone to match, same three contract variables.
Set his price where we want for non-PL to match, same three contract variables.
Set his price for anyone/non-PL, accept only on condition of acquiring a replacement we want, same contract variables.
Actively try and sell him.
Can't think of any more, release him I guess?
All have various pros/cons and branching possible outcomes, none are ideal because the bottom line is the only outcome we want is him accepting a new contract, or his current one I suppose. Once that isn't possible then it's just a matter of working for the best case scenario, which we have tried to do (and possibly succeeded, who knows?).
So basically I think your equation is incomplete. Is the situation resolved now? No. Should it have been? Yes. Could it have been? No. (Unless said resolution is the nuclear option)
I thought he was on about £70k at the moment (and turned down something more like £100k) which is more like £3.5m a year. Not that that really changes your point.
Even so, it's not totally irrelevant. I mean I'm sure he could retire today and live what most people would consider a comfortable life in a 3 bed semi somewhere. I imagine he's used to a certain lifestyle though and will want to maintain that as best he can for the rest of his life.
I used to have weight watchers ****e in a box 300. Half a tin of beans 100. Bottle of vino 400ish. 800 worked just as well as 600 for me.If it wasn't Dry January (and a point to prove with my other half) I would.
Sometimes I do this:
Bottle of Merlot 450 calories.
Slice of bread 65 calories.
Butter 45 calories.
600 Calories for the day.
Nice fast day![]()
ah, the old 5/2 diet? It's brilliant, isn't it. I went from 15 1/2 st to just under 12 in about 6 months, though I'm fortunate in that I don't drink, sometimes I just have a cake on my fast day, it's around 600calories. on my eating days I eat w/e I want, usually start off with a sausage and cheese omelette in a french bread stick with heinz firecracker sauceIf it wasn't Dry January (and a point to prove with my other half) I would.
Sometimes I do this:
Bottle of Merlot 450 calories.
Slice of bread 65 calories.
Butter 45 calories.
600 Calories for the day.
Nice fast day![]()
Well I can't imagine any discussion where your lifestyle is irrelevant to your salary but I wasn't really linking the salary particularly or trying to suggest that a footballer earns the same wage in 10-15 years as a "normal" person does over a lifetime.You were linking an average persons salary over 60-70 years and how short their window was to earn big money. We weren't talking about the comparative lifestyles.
ah, the old 5/2 diet? It's brilliant, isn't it. I went from 15 1/2 st to just under 12 in about 6 months, though I'm fortunate in that I don't drink, sometimes I just have a cake on my fast day, it's around 600calories.
If it wasn't Dry January (and a point to prove with my other half) I would.
Sometimes I do this:
Bottle of Merlot 450 calories.
Slice of bread 65 calories.
Butter 45 calories.
600 Calories for the day.
Nice fast day![]()
Unless David Murray was their agent....I would love to have their tax bill, but we should remember that big earners pay big taxes. They still earn terrific money, but get less than the gross figure quoted.
He gets called out when he preaches how far we can go and then gets called out when he gives a very realistic statement.... damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.
Who'd be a football chief eh?![]()
Long as they pay what we want I don't care. I don't want Fonte here anymore.
I still like him. I just don't want a player who doesn't want to be here.But you loved him last season. You are so damn fickle.
I still like him. I just don't want a player who doesn't want to be here.
They all haven't handed in a transfer request. I will say the same for any player that does.What if they all don't want to be here, really?
Not keen on selling players mid-season, especially ones which are crucial to our squad. If he wants to go, let him go in summer when we can line up a replacement, rather than having to scramble to fit a gap in our squad.