Financial Fair Play request

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
If we're heading to League One, FFP works differently there.

Financial Regulation - The English Football League (efl.com)

League One and League Two Clubs follow the Salary Cost Management Protocol (“SCMP”) These state that Clubs can only spend a fixed percentage of its revenue on player wages etc. This limit can also be added to or impacted by equity injections or net transfer spend.

This would actually be far better for us.

"Under SCMP rules, matchday and commercial income, TV revenue, merit payments based on league position, donations from the owners and injections of equity are included in the EFL’s turnover figure."

Essentially, if the owners really did want to put in lots of money, they could do so and enable us to get a decent squad together. Will be a true test of how committed the owners really are though.
 
This would actually be far better for us.

"Under SCMP rules, matchday and commercial income, TV revenue, merit payments based on league position, donations from the owners and injections of equity are included in the EFL’s turnover figure."

Essentially, if the owners really did want to put in lots of money, they could do so and enable us to get a decent squad together. Will be a true test of how committed the owners really are though.

That's what I was thinking.
 
A club like ours is forever going to be governed by ffp. A small ground and a small fanbase doesn't generate the necessary income to compete in the transfer market at this level. There are exceptions to that theory, Luton Town as an example or Brentford. Both were/are run with a good business model, a good manager and a very good recruitment process. Brentford scoured the foreign market for cheap imports, often selling for profit but with the replacement already in line. Luton, when they last played us had 4 strikers in the matchday squad all capable of starting. We only had Dykes. They are now in a position to improve their ground and even if relegation come then they will be in a better position to bounce back.
We are years and years away from even getting close to those two teams, if ever to be honest. We are literally operating as a league 1 or even league 2 club. My expectations of this season are to be relegated, especially with no signs of any tactics or identity from Ainsworth. I believe the rebuild will start in league 1 which could take a few seasons of mediocrity there. It is what it is, it's the direction our owners have steered us towards.

It's the owners' actions I can't get my head around.
I know they're putting in millions every month, but why?
If there's no ambition to get us anywhere, why are they bothering?
What's their endgame?
Spot on re Ainsworth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobmid
This would actually be far better for us.

"Under SCMP rules, matchday and commercial income, TV revenue, merit payments based on league position, donations from the owners and injections of equity are included in the EFL’s turnover figure."

Essentially, if the owners really did want to put in lots of money, they could do so and enable us to get a decent squad together. Will be a true test of how committed the owners really are though.

Maybe that's the plan, but they obviously can't say as much.
 
This would actually be far better for us.

"Under SCMP rules, matchday and commercial income, TV revenue, merit payments based on league position, donations from the owners and injections of equity are included in the EFL’s turnover figure."

Essentially, if the owners really did want to put in lots of money, they could do so and enable us to get a decent squad together. Will be a true test of how committed the owners really are though.
I don’t get it. Owners are allowed to pump their clubs full of unearned cash in League One and below cf Wrexham, but when they get to the championship (if they operate on this basis) they will have to drastically cut this ‘investment’ (ie gifting) to align with turnover based rules?*

I need to go back to FFP 101.

Seems to me the basic decision is do we want clubs to be run as owners’ play things, thus unsustainable in real world economic situations ie profit and loss accounting, or impose some real life rules. Seems to be somewhere in between at the moment.

*and where does our owners £2m a month loans converted to equity stand in this scenario?
 
Last edited:
I don’t get it. Owners are allowed to pump their clubs full of unearned cash in League One and below cf Wrexham, but when they get to the championship (if they operate on this basis) they will have to drastically cut this ‘investment’ (ie gifting) to align with turnover based rules?*

I need to go back to FFP 101.

Seems to me the basic decision is do we want clubs to be run as owners’ play things, thus unsustainable in real world economic situations ie profit and loss accounting, or impose some real life rules. Seems to be somewhere in between at the moment.

and where does our owners £2m a month loans converted to equity stand in this scenario?
It's mad, it's what enabled Sunderland to build a Championship team and yet doesn't allow an actual championship team to do the same. The W12 podcast chaps even pondered if GA might actually have preferred to have gone down.
 
It's mad, it's what enabled Sunderland to build a Championship team and yet doesn't allow an actual championship team to do the same. The W12 podcast chaps even pondered if GA might actually have preferred to have gone down.

It's clear that the whole thing is an almighty **** up.
 
It's mad, it's what enabled Sunderland to build a Championship team and yet doesn't allow an actual championship team to do the same. The W12 podcast chaps even pondered if GA might actually have preferred to have gone down.

Talked about exactly same thing on the Open All Rs podcast too - it's nuts