Get back to sucking JT off Fevruil you deluded **** up.
He'll no doubt give your balls a tickle if you swallow.
FA take no action against Clattenburg
- Thread starter - jordan -
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Get back to sucking JT off Fevruil you deluded **** up.
He'll no doubt give your balls a tickle if you swallow.
I can only imagine they made it public to show they were taking the allegation seriously in the wake of the Terry scandal.
I think at this moment in time, Chelsea F.C can not do anything right, whatever they do.
Pretty sure legally you have to prove beyond any doubt that someone is guilty before you can convict.
In the FA it's beyond a reasonable doubt. Just because he was innocent in a legal sense doesn't mean he actually was, just that they couldn't prove it 100%.
The FA don't need to, just beyond reasonable doubt.
If anyone truly believes Terry was innocent, then they are as deluded as Liverpool fans were about Suarez. I'm under no illusions that he was innocent either, just like Chelsea fans should (and do for the most part) accept Terry was guilty.
As for the whole Cattenberg saga, the club shouldn't be punished for following through on accusations of racial hatred. However they should apologise to Cattenberg and compensate him for publicly denouncing him before any evidence was found.
In the FA it's beyond a reasonable doubt. Just because he was innocent in a legal sense doesn't mean he actually was, just that they couldn't prove it 100%.
The FA don't need to, just beyond reasonable doubt.
If anyone truly believes Terry was innocent, then they are as deluded as Liverpool fans were about Suarez. I'm under no illusions that he was innocent either, just like Chelsea fans should (and do for the most part) accept Terry was guilty.
As for the whole Cattenberg saga, the club shouldn't be punished for following through on accusations of racial hatred. However they should apologise to Cattenberg and compensate him for publicly denouncing him before any evidence was found.
So what you have proven is that you understand no part of "innocent until proven guilty", its nice to see our education system in action!
As for doing what you suggested , it would be hard to do , I mean I cant reach that far as we tend to like spit roasting your mum
Its a good thing that our court system is based on facts rather than opinions or I don't like the look of him. The FA Court has a 99.6% conviction rate , which is not even bettered by communist china. They had to ignore their own bylaws to even bring a case against Terry.
I dont know what was said and quite frankly no one else does apart from John Terry , But then again he was supposed to have knocked up his mates ex-girlfriend and everyone said yep he did it, even though the papers who printed that, retracted in full and paid he compensation for the lies they printed, but no one ever seems to mention that either!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/oct/07/newsoftheworld-john-terry
"Vanessa Perroncel was alleged in several papers to have had an affair with the Chelsea and England footballer John Terry. All sorts of personal and private information about Perroncel was published at the time, much it false.
The first paper to make amends was the Mail on Sunday. On page 18 of its 4 July issue, it carried a single, but significant, paragraph:
On January 31, we published some personal information about Vanessa Perroncel concerning an alleged affair with the footballer John Terry. We have since been informed she would have preferred this to remain private and it was untrue in any case. We apologise to Miss Perroncel for any distress caused.
On Sunday, a very similar apology appeared on page 18 of the News of the World, which can also be found on its website. It read:
VANESSA PERRONCEL
On January 31 and afterwards we published some personal information about Vanessa Perroncel in articles concerning an alleged affair with the footballer John Terry.
Miss Perroncel has since informed us that she would have preferred her personal information to remain private and it was untrue in any case. We apologise to Miss Perroncel for any distress caused."
Important parts posted for those who can't be bothered to read the article and will keep on believing the rubbish!
That's the biggest joke in all this tbh. You can't respect a decision from a body that just ignores its own rules. Funny, we follow the rules to the letter over Clattenberg and still monkeys blame us.
Reading football forums is bad for one's faith in humanity. You get the impression that the average IQ of the UK is about 70 and the adult population has an emotional age of an eight year old.
I know it is difficult, what with various media providing their opinions driving their own agendas, but if you can't negotiate the media minefield stick to Peter and Jane books. BTW did Pat ever get the big red ball?
I know it is difficult, what with various media providing their opinions driving their own agendas, but if you can't negotiate the media minefield stick to Peter and Jane books. BTW did Pat ever get the big red ball?
The birmingham six are bloody glad that idiot wasn't on their appeal court hearing I'll bet!
It really is a very strange stance to take. Basically he is saying that if you're charged you're guilty because if you do get off it isn't because you're innocent just that they didn't prove you were guilty.
The bits that they printed that were false didn't relate to him having an affair with her though did they?
No, they didn't.
It related to the allegations that she aborted his child etc.
At least trade in the facts fevruil.
WTF can you not read?
On January 31, we published some personal information about Vanessa Perroncel concerning an alleged affair with the footballer John Terry. We have since been informed she would have preferred this to remain private and it was untrue in any case. We apologise to Miss Perroncel for any distress caused.
The information was in relation to information published around the affair, not the affair itself.
The apologies were in the Mail on Sunday and the News of the World.
I read them both, at the time and not courtesy of some one eyed bullshit that says JT is a god.
