Everything LUST

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
As I've said many times, GFH play on words all the time. A number of you should really go back and read precisely what was said & consider your findings before mouthing off inadvisedly again.

Statement from Lucas ...

http://lucasradebe.com/news/statement-regarding-leeds-united-acquisition/

Following recent speculation, I can confirm that I am part of a consortium which has submitted a preliminary indication of interest regarding the acquisition of a stake in Leeds United Football Club. We hope to continue our recent discussions confidentially with the current shareholders and the Board. We would like the opportunity to explain both the substance of our proposal, and our strategy for working with GFH Capital to continue the re-building process at the club.

Leeds United has a special place in my heart. Ever since I retired I have been considering ways to get involved at the Club – working at Board level with an equity interest would be the pinnacle. It is my dream scenario. I would not have become involved if I didn’t think our consortium would be able to help give the Club a chance to go back up to the Premier League where it belongs, and to keep it there.

I am hopeful we can find a way forward and make progress.

Play on words, or be vague enough to wriggle out from under when it's bollocks. Depends on if you are a convert or a doubter. Why would a supporters trust want to hide behind interpretations and weasel words if they are the real deal? The answer: because they arnt and are only pretending to have some clout they don't have.
 
GFH are and always have been very particular about wordings. They said no takeover was on the table, Radebe has said that his consortium are interested in working with GFH to get the club back where they belong. So what GFH said is correct, no takeover is on the cards but they are looking for investments (which is what this seems like on the face of it).

I'll be honest with you though, with all of the recent dramas around Leeds United and the boardroom I am losing a lot of interest in that side of the club. I mainly just watch the football now and don't pay too much attention to the rest unless it is actually announced. There is always way too much speculation which most of the time is started more out of hope than evidence.
 
GFH are and always have been very particular about wordings. They said no takeover was on the table, Radebe has said that his consortium are interested in working with GFH to get the club back where they belong. So what GFH said is correct, no takeover is on the cards but they are looking for investments (which is what this seems like on the face of it).

I'll be honest with you though, with all of the recent dramas around Leeds United and the boardroom I am losing a lot of interest in that side of the club. I mainly just watch the football now and don't pay too much attention to the rest unless it is actually announced. There is always way too much speculation which most of the time is started more out of hope than evidence.
Well said Josh. I used to spend as much time as anyone following takeover dramas but after last protracted load of nonsense, never again for me. I support Leeds United, not Gfh, lust, bates or radebe consortium
 
Never really bought into LUST,
When KB was in charge they had a point,as did all of us.
Hope they have the clubs interests at heart,worrying tho I just read on another forum,a poster was in the bremner suite with the lust chairman,this guy left at half time.
Makes you think.

whatever is posted on whatever forum mate that is a complete lie, not the first and wont be the last, my ST is N12 row f seat 176, ive not been in bremner suite for about 5 years.
 
Still don't really know what to make of LUST to be honest. I'm all for supporters having part ownership of a club and a bit of a say in how it's run.

But since they formed, they haven't really gained much momentum recently have they? That's even after meetings with the new owners etc. I think maybe fans are starting to realise that we should leave GFH to continue the decent work so far, albeit slow progress, which I personally prefer anyway.

when i came to the chair in 2009 membership stood at 224, today its 9188, were now in a position to offer our members and all #LUFC fans the chace to buy a stake in the future of their club amongst many other projects we have and are working on, i am pretty proud of the momentum we built mate :)
 
Off the pitch we seem to be going along nicely at the moment, slowly but surely righting the wrongs. We don't really need this new, unsettling speculation. That Radebe is supposedly involved is negated by the fact Adam Pearson is supposedly involved too. A takeover of sorts for a majority purchase of £7M isn't worth the hassle and the disruption it would potentially have on the playing side.
I'd rather have Noorruddin, Haigh and Patel steadying the ship for the moment even if they don't have a vast amount of money to invest on the playing side. They and McDermott seem to have a good working relationship, and having less money is in a way giving more of our young development squad players a chance of breaking through.
LUST need to stop meddling and attempting to introduce Micky Mouse investors, GFH are more than capable of doing that themselves. In my opinion there really is no need for LUST anymore, we have the supporters club already in LUSC.
LUST should be thanked for their part in ridding us of Bates, but they've served their purpose now, there's no more for them to do.

you havent a clue what a trust is all about have you mate?
 
GFH say it's bollocks.
It can't be bollocks again can it?

Of course it can. Fat fook was on the tele saying who lust were involved. I think we can now be sure it's bollocks. He just wants a seat on the board without buying it.

For me LUST always was a bag of ****e but with GC anywhere near it, with the exception of his civil partner WJ and the self righteous brother the rest of you must be coming to the same conclusion?

you've a lot to say from a position of anonymity mate, sorry if my being over weight offends you but i reckon your hardly brad pitt, stay safe and anonymnous mate, it lends you so much credibility :lol:
 
Billy

Set your petition up and I'll sign it mate. Cooper won't disband Lust because it will take him out of the spot light.

I swear down this whole take over BS is to make sure he still stays relevant and a talking point with in the Leeds fan base.

I think he should come back on this board and explain himself instead of having his minions on here doing it for him.

and i think you should try coming to a public meeting and making your points in person instead of sniping on a message board mate, bring glory days with you, but it wont happen will it? November 27th, 7pm, Legends Lounge, theres your chance, friendly invitation extended to all who want to voice their opinions gents, there will even be a buffet :-)
 
Sorry to disagree, there is nothing he can SAY to prove his integrity. A man is judged by his actions alone.
For all I take the mick out of WJ I do feel some sympathy for him. In theory lust was and is a good idea. The problem is that it has been hijacked by a shyster.

I am still struggling to work out if the "let's meet for a chat" line is a way of menacing non believers into silence. If it is then it's not going to end well.

dont sit figuring it out mate, bring your opinions and your personal abuse to the next public meeting, i am not offering abuse to anyone nor am i making threats, i am giving you the opportunity you seem to crave, the chance to tell me what you think in person Leeds fan to Leeds fan, you have a lot to say about me from a long way away anonymously so i am offering you a real chance to make your feelings know, broadcast to thousands, put me in my place mate and enjoy a fine buffet at the same time, thats gotta tempt you ;-)
 
Direct action is required in that you are quite correct. Not wasting my breath on Cooper though.

Today I have written to smiley and David requesting that they cease having dialogue with LUST while GC is involved. I have cited a number of instances where blobby has published inaccurate and potentially damaging information about Leeds United, GFH and other potential investors. I would suggest others follow suit. In short a simple LUST not in my name letter is all that is required.

i try to be as diplomatic in my response as possible but sorry mate this is hilarious :D :D :D
 
i try to be as diplomatic in my response as possible but sorry mate this is hilarious

Got to agree Gary the half a dozen anti lust warriors on here actually believe they can get Lust disbanded and that the majority of supporters agree with them. <laugh><laugh><laugh><laugh><laugh><laugh><laugh><laugh><laugh>