I will believe that Scally has used more than just £ 1 of his own money with GFC, before I will believe that you cannot remember Basil Hayward.Before mine as well.![]()
I will believe that Scally has used more than just £ 1 of his own money with GFC, before I will believe that you cannot remember Basil Hayward.

I got 'escorted' out of the ground - by the Police at that game **( my dad - in the BMS ),was furious with me- as I got taken out via the players' tunnel ! .............These days, I'm trying desperately hard to get banned - but.......no, Mr. Scally insists on me having to suffer.
My first game was West Ham testimonial for Brian Yeo mate, I remember it as clearly as me stomping up the hill with my Hovis, then someone mentioned Accrington Stanley and I said who are they?....
You must log in or register to see media
Serious point -- I realise it's rare !
I see that Mr. Scally banned the 'peaceful' protesters ( on Tuesday )- from entering the Cheltenham (4th) game. One of their number, Dom Ballard has gone to Press ( Kent Online ), to voice his concerns about GFC. He presented a polite and sensible viewpoint - which was not vitriolic towards Mr. Scally - in fact it was courteous - far more respectful that I could have been - and even more restrained than I would allow myself.
The police presence at the 'protest' had no reason to intervene - or give any caution for words or behaviour used by Mr Ballard's group..... These people had every democratic right to express themselves - in a peaceful protest.....
I understand that Mr. Scally is permitted to exercise his democratic 'right' to refuse admission to anyone that he wishes to be 'banned.' I do feel it is churlish of Mr. Scally to act by sulking with anyone who dares to express their concern for GFC - not just Mr. Scally. Mr. Scally has continued to display his poor communication skills - and lack of empathy with the fans -- who clearly were not ''yobs '' - as described by Mr. Scally of anyone who dares to not conform to his dictatorial regime....... and - yet - this hypocrite continues to view it as appropriate to continue to take many ££ THOUSANDS of money out of The Club - money that has been given by the fans - the very fans who now have been banned.
Mr. Scally may chose to act with breath-taking arrogance and petulance.... (( This is not unfamiliar with myself - on occasions - but, not in circumstances where I am willing to cut off my nose to spite my face. )) Mr. Scally obviously feels justified in having his cake and eating it - but - ---
I have been a fan for 60 years (( yes, I am that 'old' .)) I have had a season ticket for 'donkeys years.' I attend most away games.... but - I believe that I am reaching a breaking point -- NOT with the team (( as long as they give 100% )), but with the tyrannical style of our Chairman... I do not believe that he has been fair with fans for a long time. (( especially STH- as has been well documented over the time in this ( and other ) forum. ))
My allegiance is to Gillingham Football Club - not -Mr. P. Scally !.... I have given him sufficient praise for his business skill in paying £1 for the Club ( and taking millions out of it. ) I have stated that many ( if not most ), people, in his position would act with much the same self-interest....
I feel that Mr. Scally has been handsomely rewarded for his 'consultancy' skills - (( actually, I mean that he has rewarded himself )... I feel uncomfortable with fans being unjustly treated - for merely showing genuine concern for the future of The Club -- all done with a peaceful protest - without mob violence and mass destruction of property - or arson, looting etc!...
I feel that I can no longer sit back - without supporting these peaceful protesters - who probably expressed the viewpoint of - dare I say 99.9+% of ALL fans of GFC...... What would Mr. Scally have done if the other 99.9+% of the fans, on Tuesday night joined the protest ?..... The only reason, imho, why other fans do not express their feelings -is because it would be futile..... Quite clearly, nothing will change - all the while Mr. Scally is in charge..... Some of that is NOT his fault - but- his interaction with the ( non-protesting ) fans, has not exactly endeared himself to them - and he fails to understand that his reaction - or lack of dialogue or action to address the real concerns of the fans, will further alienate him..
I have got to the point, this morning, where I do not have much 'stomach' for going to use my season ticket for Saturday's game - and not just because I can't have support for the current first 11 - who, by their inexperience, have insufficient quality to compete - but - because of my implied support and 'acceptance' of the contempt in which fans are being held - if I choose to do nothing or say nothing in support of the peaceful protesters.
All they want to do is support the Club and the playing side (( and not from the position of a tax exile for 10 years ! ))**.. At least they're not giving Mr. Scally any more money.
** I wonder if Windyrog has a spare room ?
brbbrb - what are you trying to do ?? -- are you hoping to be banned from Priestfield ?
I've been saying, for a while, that Evans' tactics have been wrong.( hoofball - and either no substitutes, or when it's been too late. ))
I can have some sympathy for him - because of the poor tools at his disposal - but the style of football has been extremely ineffective - in terms of goals... maybe the current squad is incapable of anything better -- in which case - what's the point of paying anyone to be a manager (( mind you, the same philosophy could apply to our Chairman. )) --- do you think that we are both in danger of having 'free' Saturday afternoons in the near future?
I'm always pleased to see Mr Evans looking for a job rather than having one. Having said that though he has been sacked a shed load of times but keeps coming back. Don't you find this is the problem in football where a club sacks a manager and then has a list of other managers who have been sacked from other places. It's a constant merry-go-round with them. The question is, is it better to find a brand spanking new manager even if untried rather than a perpetual failed one. Even the premier league do it.
It's the man himself I don't like brb rather than any tactics. I can't say I've ever had to look at him and analyse. The other thing I'm not too happy with is the constant swapping of managers where one gets chopped at club A then gets a job at club B followed by numerous other letters of the alphabet. There doesn't seem to be an appetite for a new man in charge. Managers just get passed around and around and pretty much fail wherever they go. Which obviously points out that only a small few can succeed anyway.
I don't agree with your loan player theory though. I don't think you have to borrow a shed load of players from clubs above. One or two perhaps but not half a squad. We did that last year and it started out well only to fall apart halfway through the season. We had often done it like Gillingham does and it rarely worked. What we did this time was partly develop our own from the youth set up and introduce them bit by bit into the first team and bring in our own players rather than loans. We are a self sustaining club now and our owner will not bust a bank to pay for transfers we can't afford or pay wages we haven't got. We get free players with only the occasional small fee paid but if they are any good we then get to sell on rather than return a better player having developed them. Why develop somebody else's player when you can do it for your own is the new philosophy. Have to say it has worked quite well this season although of course it could still go tits up. The coaches have dictated a style of play that has been adopted from the bottom to the top. The 10 year olds have to play the same way the first team does. If an 18 year old has to play in the first team they already know what they have to do. It's a good way of working and I don't know why other clubs haven't seen the benefits.