I know. I took a back seat but then I tried to explain his lies and misunderstandings and they accumulate faster than I can respond to!
Off Topic EU deabte. Which way are you voting ?
- Thread starter PINKIE
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
You'll go down a storm in parliament Pete, in your scummy tracky bottoms and your old man cardigan. Will they let you take the dog with you?
When did I say post 8527 was to do with bigotry. You seem to have forgotten your own post that I was quoting. And you're saying I don't have the skills for debating? At least I can remember what I've just posted you daft twonk
It's probably as well just to sink to their level, and point out that they're clueless tossers who put a low price on their principles.
What is inaccurate or baseless about it?
I should do my own research? Are you serious?
You obviously will never say anything sensible no matter how much we try to guide you in the right direction.
Pete thinks that if he fill this thread with pulp, his bigotted posts will become confined to history and lost in the ether. That's his motives for spamming the thread now.
Pete's laid his life bare on this forum. That was a very silly thing to do!
Why? Surely you don't think a couple of tossers posting playground level comments on a forum has any credibility outside their own tiny minds.
Yes, Pete do your own research instead of following the agenda of a right-wing tabloid newspaper. I understand you might find that strange, hence why you asked if I was serious, but you might learn something instead of trying to find things to reinforce your bigotry. At least 'some' eurosceptics had the decency to distance themselves from your views on that. Or are you going to deny that also.
Pete's laid his life bare on this forum. That was a very silly thing to do!
It's not much of a life tbf.
Why? Surely you don't think a couple of tossers posting playground level comments on a forum has any credibility outside their own tiny minds.
When you get up to playground level, you can play too. Until then, kindly **** off!...
Hull has come wading in to defend the bigot because he happened to vote the same way as him. Much like Fez. But ofcourse they're not siding with him at all
You said that Fez was supporting my "bigoted statements" but you couldn't provide evidence of that and you couldn't provide evidence of any bigoted statements". That was what I responded to. Then you avoided our requests for you to provide evidence and then started going on about googling and children instead. Both of which you showed you lacked logic.When did I say post 8527 was to do with bigotry. You seem to have forgotten your own post that I was quoting. And you're saying I don't have the skills for debating? At least I can remember what I've just posted you daft twonk
You have been damned with Pete's worst approbrium. 'You will never say anything sensible'.
Nah, kindly or otherwise, watching some tossers squeal and try to obfuscate is funny, so I'll stay around and laugh at you for a while longer yet.
The police stating that they believe something does not constitute as evidence it counts as opinion or an educated guess.
Maybe you'd be surprised at how cautious businesses can be about associating with people who make sweeping generalisations about how Romanians are ATM thieves. Very silly!Why? Surely you don't think a couple of tossers posting playground level comments on a forum has any credibility outside their own tiny minds.
Another rant
Go back and read your first paragraph in response to my post about how deroragotory terminology of bigots has been used against bigots to hold a mirror up to their bigotry. You've gone on to rant about how you don't get the sarcasm. All you saw was posters using the terms "darkies". Just because you don't get the sarcasm is neither here nor there, that's your problem not ours
My post was quite clear on how you choose to support the bigotry of people like Pete. It's self-explanatory, you do it by focusing on attacking those who ridicule his bigotry rather than holding him to account for it. How hard is that for you to understand? Ofcourse YOU have no comeback to this so you go off on a rant about evidences and apologies. If only you went after him as veciferously as you do the posters who used sarcasm to show him up to be the bigot he is, then I wouldn't have made the post would I. That's ALL I intimated in my post, it's not rocket science fella, just fact. You want to carry on stroking that chip on your shoulder because you don't like the truth, you carry on.
My posts are not rants, just responses to your lies.
If you think you have proof of me supporting bigotry then re-post it; it's really very simple. Why do you keep referring to it but seem incapable of doing the sensible thing and re-posting it?
I understand sarcasm, but I thought what I read was simply inappropriate remarks used to try and enforce ridicule. If we disagree on that then that's fine by me.
You have been caught out deliberately telling lies to try and maintain your piss-poor argument. That's bad, even on an anonymous footie board, which is why you are continuing to lie and throw out insults as a diversion, but it won't work.
Nobody distanced themselves from my views. You don't seem to be able to understand the simplest things. Fez didn't distance himself from my views. He simply asked you to justify yourself when you said that he supported "my bigoted views". He couldn't have supported them because I didn't display any bigoted views for anybody to be able to support. You can't even show any evidence of any "bigoted views".
You are a total waste of time. Do you think you are cut out to have anything to do with education?
- Status