Election 2024
- Thread starter brb
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
He's gone mate, but can't come out today because of the Kings Speech, so everyone has to be respectful and be good for a day, but it's been leaked Streeting is going to resign.Starmer gave Streeting a 15-min meeting
Farage being investigated for not declaring that £5M gift. Parliamentary standards.
lazy af pink haired lesbian illusion of reality that bro and that ignorance of reality is exactly why reform will storm to victory in the next ge.
Anyone supporting reform is a thick racist lol
Nothing to do with the rapes and murders we see evey day by asylum seekers
Nothing to do with the fact theres boroughs of london and parts of England that have been completely taken over and dominated by migrant populations
Nothing to do with muslim rape gangs targetting mainly white girls for all kinds of disgusting things and labour covering it up and doing everything they can today to keep it that way
I cba to go on but i fukin could
What are Reforms policies regarding other things?
I'm particularly interested in gender rights because 2 of my 4 wives are Iranian and they asked me to find out before they join the free world where women are valued
Thanks in advance
Stuff 5 million notes down Farage’s trousers, and you can order your own policies straight off the menu.
I love **** like this.
I thought it an interesting one because I expected Farage to be raging that his bank account had been scrutinised by someone who then passed the information to a Guardian journalist - like he raged one other time over bank dealings and people divulging information.
My assumption would be that £5M would automatically flag at the bank to be approved, it wasn't crypto and alluded as a cash payment, so they would have needed to use CHAPS (Clearing House).
Apparently according to the document I've attached, it's a defence for a data controller to pass information on if it's perceived to be in the public interest, albeit it will be a criminal offence in the first instance.
The police could be investigating it for all we know, but bank wouldn't be allowed to divulge that as it would be classed as tipping off I assume. As I've already said Parliament is investigating it.
As for the Starmer ticket, that was just nonsense, I'd expect a public figure to be at top events, and if his team is Arsenal why not.
Supporting the Arse is a sackable offence on its own, never mind the Mandelson ****
Sounds like Wes Streeting will not only resign tomorrow but also raise a leadership challenge. I assume he must think he can get the number of people behind him required - although it's not the ideal way forward according to political commentators, a better solution would be for Starmer to put forward a date to resign, that way it could be in September and enable Andy Burnham to join the race. As it stands, Streeting is happy to mount a challenge and worry about the Burnham factor in the future. Whatever happens, Wes is hell bent on causing chaos by the sounds of it, my words. I'm NOT convinced he's going to get that magic number of 81 MP's, if he does he's more popular that I thought.
Angela Rayner who messed up her stamp duty lost her job as deputy PM, but Farage takes £5m bribes and the beeb are like, whatever...
I watched the King's speech today and then all of the pantomine of Parliament and the 'will he won't he' debacle around Wes Streeting.
The whole thing comes across as an absolute cluster **** from Labour. On the day where they should be setting the agenda for what legislation in on the books, it's all dominated by a ****ing pantomime about who is going to stab Starmer in the back.
I actually thought some of the content in the Kings speech was decent enough, closer ties with Europe, nationalising British steel, promoting energy independence, protecting small businesses from late payments, modernising the governance of the NHS, removing barriers to education, ending leaseholds and capping ground rent, making sure council housing doesn't get bought up. There was even some fairly radical immigration curbs (for a labour govt anyway) restricting the rights of immigrants and reducing taxpayer support for asylum seekers.
The trouble is it's all slow and pragmatic stuff that will take the next couple of years to get into statute and then maybe a couple more to become law. And that is just the way Parliament works.
But when you have people like Farage shouting bollocks from the sidelines about sending all the asylum seekers home (he'd never be able to do it anyway) then it hooks in the people like sucky who fall for the soundbites. When the actual job of governance and getting bills into legislature takes longer and is harder to achieve. People don't want to hear that, so they get frustrated and listen to the gobby ****es who promise stuff they'd never be able to deliver on.
Anyway, like I say, if it all wasn't difficult enough to get all of this into law. Labour are simply putting a torch to their own survival by having an civil war.
What a **** show
Suggestion seems to be if Streeting puts himself forward so will Raynor. They said Starmer and his allies were all going round after the Kings Speech to encourage their support for Keir.
From what I've gathered from Labour commentators and Union spokesmen, Labour aren't far enough left for them, and have forgotten about working class.
Going to be honest I fail to see how any millionaire whatever party they are from can understand the working class.
Thought it was going to kick off between two Tories today, who are friends btw, when one of them suggested freezing benefits.
The response come back why always the worst off in society, how about going after the banks. I think quite a few Labour front benchers are millionaires from a list I saw somewhere the other day.
How have we got to this stage where we are being governed by the richest.
I see people all the time slagging off Raynor and although she aint the brightest tool in the box at least she did come from a council estate. Although her actual net work now is about £1M (the most accurate source given).
Yes she's also a tax dodger, but are any of our politicians clean, everyone of them has got their nose in the trough somewhere.
Seriously some of these people can never understand what it's like being the poorest in society.
Btw SKY have constantly mentioned the Farage investigation, peeps need to stop watching the beeb bro. Beth Rigby absolutely grilled him the other day.
I think the whole thing is an unneccessary sideshow from getting on with Governing, which will likely take months to play out and will delay all sorts of actual useful stuff getting done.
But if they are determined to change their leader then probably better to do it now midterm instead of doing a 'Biden' and leaving it to the last minute and letting a deranged nutter into office (a la Farage here)
I'd vote for Rayner. I know she ****ed up with her stamp duty, but imo it's not on the same level as some of these leeches who make it their mission to make as much money as possible and stash it away offshore out of the reaches of HMRC.
Like you say, she's from a council estate and was a single mum, trying to work and bring up a kid on her own. So she gets what it's like for ordinary folk far more than some of these Spivs who come straight out of public schools, into investment banks and then become MPs
