Election 2024

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

How are Labour doing after their first 12 months

  • Total voters
    23
PINKIE said:
This is what I mean, in comparison to what went before, Starmer is low key achieving.

Cameron was basically a posh spiv who gambled the country's future and lost. His MPs were defecting to UKIP and rather than put the country first, he put his party unity first and lost on both counts.

What followed that was basically a **** show, culminating in Boris' botched hard brexit that cost the UK $90bn last year alone.

But in a world where social media now sets the tone and Reform have successfully scared and angered enough people into believing that brown people on boats are responsible for the gaping hole in the finances and public services and Starmer is the fall guy
Click to expand...
lazy af pink haired lesbian illusion of reality that bro and that ignorance of reality is exactly why reform will storm to victory in the next ge.

Anyone supporting reform is a thick racist lol

Nothing to do with the rapes and murders we see evey day by asylum seekers

Nothing to do with the fact theres boroughs of london and parts of England that have been completely taken over and dominated by migrant populations

Nothing to do with muslim rape gangs targetting mainly white girls for all kinds of disgusting things and labour covering it up and doing everything they can today to keep it that way

I cba to go on but i fukin could <laugh> <whistle>
 
Sucky said:
lazy af pink haired lesbian illusion of reality that bro and that ignorance of reality is exactly why reform will storm to victory in the next ge.

Anyone supporting reform is a thick racist lol

Nothing to do with the rapes and murders we see evey day by asylum seekers

Nothing to do with the fact theres boroughs of london and parts of England that have been completely taken over and dominated by migrant populations

Nothing to do with muslim rape gangs targetting mainly white girls for all kinds of disgusting things and labour covering it up and doing everything they can today to keep it that way

I cba to go on but i fukin could <laugh> <whistle>
Click to expand...

I rest my case <laugh>
 
Simple fact is that the one thing Greens, Libs and Reform agree on is completely correct. The British FPTP electoral system is a problem and needs to go, a form of PR is long overdue and anyone disagreeing at this stage are just off their heads.
 
Welshie said:
Simple fact is that the one thing Greens, Libs and Reform agree on is completely correct. The British FPTP electoral system is a problem and needs to go, a form of PR is long overdue and anyone disagreeing at this stage are just off their heads.
Click to expand...

FPTP, with simple legal changes + some
schoolboy statistics, can be made far more
equitable and exciting.
 
Welshie said:
I know you love a short quippy paragraph but now and again you have to explain what the actual **** you're jabbering about
Click to expand...

1. Voting becomes mandatory

2. A 'none of them' (NOT) option goes on the ballot.

3. If NOT is the majority selection, a bag draw is
made for the winner (with a bit of schoolboy stats
deciding the entrants) .


Assuming historical no-shows are NOTs,
there would be a huge number of constituencies
per election where chance would decide.
 
Sucky said:
lazy af pink haired lesbian illusion of reality that bro and that ignorance of reality is exactly why reform will storm to victory in the next ge.

Anyone supporting reform is a thick racist lol

Nothing to do with the rapes and murders we see evey day by asylum seekers

Nothing to do with the fact theres boroughs of london and parts of England that have been completely taken over and dominated by migrant populations

Nothing to do with muslim rape gangs targetting mainly white girls for all kinds of disgusting things and labour covering it up and doing everything they can today to keep it that way

I cba to go on but i fukin could <laugh> <whistle>
Click to expand...
Who put another £0.50 in the sucky meter.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: PINKIE and brb
The RDBD said:
1. Voting becomes mandatory

2. A 'none of them' (NOT) option goes on the ballot.

3. If NOT is the majority selection, a bag draw is
made for the winner (with a bit of schoolboy stats
deciding the entrants) .


Assuming historical no-shows are NOTs,
there would be a huge number of constituencies
per election where chance would decide.
Click to expand...
Might as well just throw a dice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Welshie
The RDBD said:
1. Voting becomes mandatory

2. A 'none of them' (NOT) option goes on the ballot.

3. If NOT is the majority selection, a bag draw is
made for the winner (with a bit of schoolboy stats
deciding the entrants) .


Assuming historical no-shows are NOTs,
there would be a huge number of constituencies
per election where chance would decide.
Click to expand...

You must log in or register to see images
 
  • Haha
Reactions: brb
I think Starmer knows it's curtains and returning two ageing 75 year olds to the political arena just don't feel right, no more so than when he appointed Mandelson.

Like Mandelson has he done the security checks again and what was the outcome of those checks - especially as Brown will be high level access.

Didn't Gordon Brown recently submit evidence to the police in regards to the Epstein files, even if it was restricted to emails around Mandelson and any stuff he may have known regarding Andrew Moutbatten.

Starmer has already ****ed up once around this, which also saw Morgan McSweeney losing his phone.

I have to ask, should we really be reeling back out the old dinosaurs once again, we'll accept Blair standing for PM replacement next.

I feel the future will find once again these are bad decisions, the halls of Parliament are rotten to the core.

Surely there are just as talented younger members of parliament capable of these roles, rather than an old nanny who was once sacked and another financial spiv.
 
Welshie said:
Simple fact is that the one thing Greens, Libs and Reform agree on is completely correct. The British FPTP electoral system is a problem and needs to go, a form of PR is long overdue and anyone disagreeing at this stage are just off their heads.
Click to expand...
One of the pros of FPTP traditionally was it stopped cranks having a voice. Notably the BNP in their pomp. Now it’s probably the system which gets the most cranks in though we do just have a lot more cranks than we did.
 
The RDBD said:
1. Voting becomes mandatory

2. A 'none of them' (NOT) option goes on the ballot.

3. If NOT is the majority selection, a bag draw is
made for the winner (with a bit of schoolboy stats
deciding the entrants) .


Assuming historical no-shows are NOTs,
there would be a huge number of constituencies
per election where chance would decide.
Click to expand...
How do you even go about enforcing mandatory voting?
 
Star of David Bardsley said:
How do you even go about enforcing mandatory voting?
Click to expand...

AFAIK, Australia imposes financial penalties on non voters.

My suggestion is that if you are :

1, called to a ballot of type T (T = council/MP/referendum)
2. absent, and have no just reason for that

then you are struck off the voter register for
the next ballot event (whatever T that may be) .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back