Election 2024

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

How are Labour doing after their first 12 months


  • Total voters
    23
I wasn't telling you, I was agreeing with what you were saying ffs <laugh>

Even when we have a decent convo you revert to your hostile default.

Have a cup of Camomile tea bro

You must log in or register to see images

You didn't use the word 'agreeing' though, you said you 'said to brb' - doing what you are always doing with that mask of yours, stating something that is not wholly accurate. Don't play on words with me bro, I see straight through people like you. you're so disingenuous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saf
You didn't use the word 'agreeing' though, you said you 'said to brb' - doing what you are always doing with that mask of yours, stating something that is not wholly accurate. Don't play on words with me bro, I see straight through people like you. you're so disingenuous.

You're reading waaay too much into that tbh.

Was trying to convey to somebody that I was agreeing with you, but instead you've taken it as a personal sleight.
 
You're reading waaay too much into that tbh.

Was trying to convey to somebody that I was agreeing with you, but instead you've taken it as a personal sleight.

Well it was a personal slight, the post you responded to was talking about racism and you tagged me in your quote. You never mentioned you agreed with me at all, you made it look as though you was stating something to me...in a response to comment that was talking about something entirely different. I'm reading what I'm seeing and that's as I said, you being disingenuous as usual.
 
Well it was a personal slight, the post you responded to was talking about racism and you tagged me in your quote. You never mentioned you agreed with me at all, you made it look as though you was stating something to me...in a response to comment that was talking about something entirely different. I'm reading what I'm seeing and that's as I said, you being disingenuous as usual.

If you read it properly, you'll see that in that same sentence, I said the same thing that I'd said to you about the WFA, WASPI and Farmer's tax being PR own goals. That's why I said 'I said to brb' I could have said 'I spoke to brb' or 'I was chatting to brb' they all mean the same thing.

That was all on the back of the convo we were having agreeing about Starmer not doing a lot wrong overall and being a decent statesman on the world stage.

You've read it wrong and taken it personally over the slightest semantic misunderstanding.
 
If you read it properly, you'll see that in that same sentence, I said the same thing that I'd said to you about the WFA, WASPI and Farmer's tax being PR own goals. That's why I said 'I said to brb' I could have said 'I spoke to brb' or 'I was chatting to brb' they all mean the same thing.

That was all on the back of the convo we were having agreeing about Starmer not doing a lot wrong overall and being a decent statesman on the world stage.

You've read it wrong and taken it personally over the slightest semantic misunderstanding.

Nah I've taken anything wrong, I see it exactly as you intended it. I didn't say that you hadn't said a certain thing, I pointed out to you that you missed the point of stating it was in agreement with me. You used to do this to HiaG and to me behind PM, I don't trust you bro, took me a while to wise up to you, that's my trusting nature...but the last thing you ever said to me and tobes behind PM, showed me exactly who you really were....much like who you really were when you passed info to Sucky about HiaG, a person not to be trusted.
 
Nah I've taken anything wrong, I see it exactly as you intended it. I didn't say that you hadn't said a certain thing, I pointed out to you that you missed the point of stating it was in agreement with me. You used to do this to HiaG and to me behind PM, I don't trust you bro, took me a while to wise up to you, that's my trusting nature...but the last thing you ever said to me and tobes behind PM, showed me exactly who you really were....much like who you really were when you passed info to Sucky about HiaG, a person not to be trusted.

Whatever man. You've read it wrong and now you're off on one.

You need a bigger cup for that Camomile tea

You must log in or register to see images
 
Polls are bouncing around right now, with the last two showing a Labour lead again

But, of course the most remarkable is that the Tories are rooted in third place.

They won't stick with Badenoch at this rate surely


I don’t see the Tories recovering this side of the next GE. A lot of their voters have decamped to the Lib Dems, and yet they’re chasing the ones who have decamped to Reform, which is probably a lost cause. Labour have four years to make a tangible difference to people’s lives; if they can do that they can see off the threat from Reform, if they can’t we’re all ****ed imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
The pushback on Muskolini's unelected DOGE cronies begins

You must log in or register to see media
 
The pushback on Muskolini's unelected DOGE cronies begins

You must log in or register to see media


Yes, and Musk wants to impeach the judge because he went against him. Sadly, the way things are going he may get his way.
 
I don’t see the Tories recovering this side of the next GE. A lot of their voters have decamped to the Lib Dems, and yet they’re chasing the ones who have decamped to Reform, which is probably a lost cause. Labour have four years to make a tangible difference to people’s lives; if they can do that they can see off the threat from Reform, if they can’t we’re all ****ed imo.

I think Reform will split the Tory vote, and given where they are right now, they are pretty ****ed in terms of getting MPs back in Parliament to threaten Labour's majority. That said, I think we'll see more Reform MPs in Parliament after the next GE, because like in Germany, there's a huge swathe of people who are frightened by immigrants and think that they are losing their way of life, and reform pander to this insecurity.

As much as I'm reluctant to bring it up again... I was agreeing with brb the other day that Starmer isn't doing a lot wrong so far (although there are people out to slate him) but the WFA, WASPI and Farmer's tax were own goals from a PR perspective, regardless of the merits of those policies. But it seems he's making some tangible inroads into the illegal immigration issue, which does need addressing and needs to be communicated to put Farage back in his box.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
Yes, and Musk wants to impeach the judge because he went against him. Sadly, the way things are going he may get his way.

You got a gun Milk....you know what to do....and before the Feds kick my door in, it's a joke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD
I think Reform will split the Tory vote, and given where they are right now, they are pretty ****ed in terms of getting MPs back in Parliament to threaten Labour's majority. That said, I think we'll see more Reform MPs in Parliament after the next GE, because like in Germany, there's a huge swathe of people who are frightened by immigrants and think that they are losing their way of life, and reform pander to this insecurity.

As much as I'm reluctant to bring it up again... I was agreeing with brb the other day that Starmer isn't doing a lot wrong so far (although there are people out to slate him) but the WFA, WASPI and Farmer's tax were own goals from a PR perspective, regardless of the merits of those policies. But it seems he's making some tangible inroads into the illegal immigration issue, which does need addressing and needs to be communicated to put Farage back in his box.

<laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
Yes, and Musk wants to impeach the judge because he went against him. Sadly, the way things are going he may get his way.

That's the tragedy of this. Anybody who tries to hold Trump to account will be set upon because he is a thin skinned and vindictive little man.

The judges in the US need support to enact the law as it's written in the constitution and legislature, because they've got a paranoid psychopath trying to chase them down.
 
I don’t see the Tories recovering this side of the next GE. A lot of their voters have decamped to the Lib Dems, and yet they’re chasing the ones who have decamped to Reform, which is probably a lost cause. Labour have four years to make a tangible difference to people’s lives; if they can do that they can see off the threat from Reform, if they can’t we’re all ****ed imo.

Reform are killing the Conservative's chance. Labour just have to do "ok" in the next four years. If Reform really wanted to move Britain to the right in a FPTP system they should disband.
 
You got a gun Milk....you know what to do....and before the Feds kick my door in, it's a joke.

Only gun I have is a bb gun I got as a teenager. It won't even pierce a paper bag, let alone the armor of the Federales.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
Well done, Labour <applause>

Now we just need to make sure all these people are deported and not released as long as they promise to stay monitored. Need tougher action on that but this is a big step forward and good to read.

Hundreds of migrants have been arrested since the start of this year as part of a UK-wide crackdown on illegal working, the government has said.

Enforcement teams raided 828 premises including nail bars, car washes, and restaurants and made 609 arrests - a 73% increase from January 2024 and the highest figure for any January on record.

Officials say many migrants are drawn in by false promises about their ability to live and work in the UK, which leads them to "risk their lives by crossing the Channel".

It comes as the government's immigration bill is set to be debated by MPs on Monday. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp has called it a "weak bill that won't stop the boats".

A significant proportion of last month's raids took place at restaurants, takeaways and cafes, the Home Office said.

It also gave examples of arrests made in vape shops in Cheshire and a grocery warehouse in south London.

Those arrested made the journey to the UK through a mix of routes, including by crossing the Channel and by overstaying legitimately-granted visas.

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the government was boosting enforcement to "record levels" and that immigration rules "must be respected".

"For far too long, employers have been able to take on and exploit illegal migrants and too many people have been able to arrive and work illegally with no enforcement action ever taken," she said.

"Not only does this create a dangerous draw for people to risk their lives by crossing the Channel in a small boat, but it results in the abuse of vulnerable people, the immigration system and our economy."

From the start of the Labour government in July up to 31 January, 3,930 arrests were made over 5,424 visits by immigration enforcement officers.

A total of 1,090 civil penalty notices were also issued, with employers facing a fine of up to £60,000 per worker if found liable.

During the same period, four of the "biggest return flights in the UK's history" were also carried out, the Home Office said, returning more than 800 people.

But Reform UK leader Nigel Farage described the new figures released by the government as feeble, compared with the numbers that had entered the country.

Across the 31 days of January, there were 1,098 people who arrived in the UK illegally on small boats.

The government said it launched a social media campaign in Vietnam in December and Albania in January discouraging people from making the journey to the UK.

The adverts highlight stories from migrants who entered the UK illegally "only to face debt, exploitation and a life far from what they were promised", the Home Office said.

It comes as the government's Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill is set to be debated in the House of Commons in its second reading.

The bill aims to introduce a raft of new offences and counter terrororism-style powers to clamp down on people smugglers bringing migrants across the Channel.

But Labour ministers have not provided a specific target on when a drop in small boat crossings could be expected.

The Conservatives said they had put forward an amendment to the immigration bill in a bid to include their own immigration proposals: to double how long it takes migrants to get indefinite leave to remain and, after that, require them to wait five years rather than one before they can apply for citizenship.

Philp added that "an effective removals deterrent is needed" to stop small boat crossings, something he said Labour had scrapped, a reference to the former government's plan to send illegal migrants to Rwanda.

Just seen footage Labour have released on the news of people being deported on to planes, 19,000 apparently including some who have broken our laws. Not sure nationalities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luvgonzo and Saf