Off Topic Does this offend you?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
There you go...it's a bit of soft porn for you...that's what society is trying to move away from...you don't need soft porn in sport...women should value themselves more but this society oppresses that model of thought.

i never thought i would see this side of you.

Spurlock the bitch choking, hoe pimping serial dating feminist!
 
Does it offend me? Nope.
Do I think it's relevant or still needed in sport? Nope.

I do think however that modern day feminists aren't a patch on the genuine ones from the past.
I get the sense that a lot of feminists nowdays want revenge rather than equality.
 
so then we aren't inundated as women being objects. If you want women or men as objects thats what porn is for. Not sport and day to day life.

I have no issues with objectifying women if thats what we want. I will be educating my daughter though if i had any

But its mainly women putting other women out of their chosen job. Its not their fault they were born fit, and feminists are all stinking hippy ugly lesbians.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luvgonzo
An art gallery has taken down a painting depicting naked nymphs "to prompt conversations about how we display and interpret artworks".

Manchester Art Gallery took down the painting of JW Waterhouse's Hylas and the Nymphs and replaced it with a notice informing people that a temporary space has been left to start a conversation about what's "relevant in the 21st century".

The gallery's curator of contemporary art, Clare Gannaway, says it is not about censorship, but the aim is to provoke debate.
 
An art gallery has taken down a painting depicting naked nymphs "to prompt conversations about how we display and interpret artworks".

Manchester Art Gallery took down the painting of JW Waterhouse's Hylas and the Nymphs and replaced it with a notice informing people that a temporary space has been left to start a conversation about what's "relevant in the 21st century".

The gallery's curator of contemporary art, Clare Gannaway, says it is not about censorship, but the aim is to provoke debate.

Publicity stunt.
If it's even slightly related to feminism it's guaranteed to gain attention.
The media craves this type of stuff at the moment and it'll only get worse. Trivial stories becoming huge events that drag on for days and weeks.
 
Publicity stunt.
If it's even slightly related to feminism it's guaranteed to gain attention.
The media craves this type of stuff at the moment and it'll only get worse. Trivial stories becoming huge events that drag on for days and weeks.

Yes sure. As for my opening post, its about what is deemed acceptable. But my thinking is, if its not harming anyone, why should others stick their noses in and dictate for the rest of us.
 
Yes sure. As for my opening post, its about what is deemed acceptable. But my thinking is, if its not harming anyone, why should others stick their noses in and dictate for the rest of us.

I can see both sides which is why I said I don't care either way.
As for the Art gallery if it really was to draw attention to whats deemed acceptable then why not on any male nudes? They know that that wouldn't gain media attention.
Same goes for advertising.
 
Like Harry said I don't care either way, people should be able to do what they want.

Yep. thats what allows these feminist ****s their right to kick up a stink. They have that right. Doesnt mean any ****er should take any notice mind.
 
If someone offered me the wage I earn now to just stand around looking pretty and I am pretty, then I'm doing that other than working for a living.:biggrin:

Think its the pretty bit that upsets them. Jealous bitches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saf
An art gallery has taken down a painting depicting naked nymphs "to prompt conversations about how we display and interpret artworks".

Manchester Art Gallery took down the painting of JW Waterhouse's Hylas and the Nymphs and replaced it with a notice informing people that a temporary space has been left to start a conversation about what's "relevant in the 21st century".

The gallery's curator of contemporary art, Clare Gannaway, says it is not about censorship, but the aim is to provoke debate.

How can you talk about it if it aint ****ing there?

The amount of bollox going around these days!!
 
It's like that Safc fella that used to post on here, he disappeared but people still talk about him.

Im guessing its he who cant be named, you know who, whatshisname thingummyginny??

In other words havent got a clue who you're on about.

But lets keep talking about him <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: luvgonzo