Liar liar pants on fire. The first 3 quotes (Including the one you "Mined" or edited to suit your argument) were all on the same day, 28/10/2012, the last quote was on 29/10/2012 . I quite clearly (clear to anyone with a brain) explained that a number of factors were at play but you as usual have seized upon one thing I said - in isolation- with complete disregard for everything else I said. So now will you tell me how I am a hypocrite? I'll wait.
Haha, to use a phrase you've piped up with many times, when you're in a hole, stop digging. I didn't edit anything to suit my arguement, that suggests I've changed your words when I merely deleted the drivel to get to the exact sentence I was after, believe it or not, people don't like reading the same quotes over and over again. Loved the dates point! Hahaha, you do know that the 29th isn't the same day as the 28th? Hence the term "argued for days"?! Plural=greater than one. You stated that you doubted the drop was anything to do with rangers first. That sentence is pretty self explanatory, even for a brainless cracker (racist?) like me. you're either full of ****e or back tracking, which is it?
Hello, Chapper, hello? [h=2]Definition of HYPOCRITE[/h]1: a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion 2: a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings So which one is it?
Hello Chapper? It's like a ****ing echo chamber in here. "textbook hypocrisy" Examples, which if my Hypocrisy is "Textbook" , there should be many?
"Is well documented, everyone knows it" another Dev-ism. So you accept the above, that you're a full of ****, back tracking, baldie slavering wreck.
