Dirty, Lying ****s

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Chapmeister... said:
See all your quotes you posted, were they over a number of days? Read the first part of the quote above and tell me I'm stupid ****ing cracker.


You said here that you doubt it had ANYTHING to do with rangers so could you please make your mind up.

You're brilliant, always a source of entertainment. I almost missed you when you were away in the huff. Your certainly a man of your word. Keep the insults up, I love it.
Click to expand...


Liar liar pants on fire. The first 3 quotes (Including the one you "Mined" or edited to suit your argument) were all on the same day, 28/10/2012, the last quote was on 29/10/2012 <doh>.

I quite clearly (clear to anyone with a brain) explained that a number of factors were at play but you as usual have seized upon one thing I said - in isolation- with complete disregard for everything else I said.

So now will you tell me how I am a hypocrite?

I'll wait.
 
DevAdvocate said:
Liar liar pants on fire. The first 3 quotes (Including the one you "Mined" or edited to suit your argument) were all on the same day, 28/10/2012, the last quote was on 29/10/2012 <doh>.

I quite clearly (clear to anyone with a brain) explained that a number of factors were at play but you as usual have seized upon one thing I said - in isolation- with complete disregard for everything else I said.

So now will you tell me how I am a hypocrite?

I'll wait.
Click to expand...


Haha, to use a phrase you've piped up with many times, when you're in a hole, stop digging.

I didn't edit anything to suit my arguement, that suggests I've changed your words when I merely deleted the drivel to get to the exact sentence I was after, believe it or not, people don't like reading the same quotes over and over again.

Loved the dates point! Hahaha, you do know that the 29th isn't the same day as the 28th? Hence the term "argued for days"?! Plural=greater than one.

You stated that you doubted the drop was anything to do with rangers first. That sentence is pretty self explanatory, even for a brainless cracker (racist?) like me. you're either full of ****e or back tracking, which is it?
 
Chapmeister... said:
Haha, to use a phrase you've piped up with many times, when you're in a hole, stop digging.

I didn't edit anything to suit my arguement, that suggests I've changed your words when I merely deleted the drivel to get to the exact sentence I was after, believe it or not, people don't like reading the same quotes over and over again.

Loved the dates point! Hahaha, you do know that the 29th isn't the same day as the 28th? Hence the term "argued for days"?! Plural=greater than one.

You stated that you doubted the drop was anything to do with rangers first. That sentence is pretty self explanatory, even for a brainless cracker (racist?) like me. you're either full of ****e or back tracking, which is it?
Click to expand...

how am I a hypocrite?
 
Chapmeister... said:
Haha, to use a phrase you've piped up with many times, when you're in a hole, stop digging.

I didn't edit anything to suit my arguement, that suggests I've changed your words when I merely deleted the drivel to get to the exact sentence I was after, believe it or not, people don't like reading the same quotes over and over again.

Loved the dates point! Hahaha, you do know that the 29th isn't the same day as the 28th? Hence the term "argued for days"?! Plural=greater than one.

You stated that you doubted the drop was anything to do with rangers first. That sentence is pretty self explanatory, even for a brainless cracker (racist?) like me. you're either full of ****e or back tracking, which is it?
Click to expand...

DevAdvocate said:
how am I a hypocrite?
Click to expand...

So you accept the above?

Finally...
 
Hello, Chapper, hello?


[h=2]Definition of HYPOCRITE[/h]1: a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion


2: a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings

So which one is it?
 
Hello Chapper? It's like a ****ing echo chamber in here.

Chapmeister... said:
Obsessed and Beelin.

Not even gonna pick apart Dev's post but there's some cracking textbook hypocrisy. Remember when he used to argue for days about the attendance drops not being because of rangers departure?

Hahahahaha.
Click to expand...

"textbook hypocrisy"

Examples, which if my Hypocrisy is "Textbook" , there should be many?
 
"Is well documented, everyone knows it" another Dev-ism.

So you accept the above, that you're a full of ****, back tracking, baldie slavering wreck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back