David Coote

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Well if you're in a job which drug tests you have to avoid cannabis due to the flawed testing. That's a choice an individual has to make.

Precisely. But it's not 'flawed' testing - it's the only testing available. Coote reported did a coke session at the Euros last year (allegedly, as said). As in the link above, coke can be in your system for 3-4 days: he would almost certainly be reffing with it in his bloodstream. That's when social use carries into professional life. He just simply shouldn't do it.
 
Precisely. But it's not 'flawed' testing - it's the only testing available. Coote reported did a coke session at the Euros last year (allegedly, as said). As in the link above, coke can be in your system for 3-4 days: he would almost certainly be reffing with it in his bloodstream. That's when social use carries into professional life. He just simply shouldn't do it.

I consider the cannabis ones flawed due to the timescales involved not being particularly useful for the purpose and the lack of after effects relative to other things.

If person A went out drinking all day on a Saturday and person B spent all day Saturday smoking up I know who I'd prefer to be driving a forklift come Monday morning.

I do take your point though. To a degree they're all flawed as people's metabolisms are different - I've known someone fail for cocaine after a week and someone else pass after 36 hours - but they're all we have to go by so we have to live with it.

As an aside you aware of how long the saliva ones used for driving are supposedly good for re cannabis? I believe it's much shorter but can't remember the exact time I was told by the old bill.
 
It is indeed. So sorry for your loss.

It's why I'm not a good barometer on certain things because I have what some people may call extreme views on particular subjects. I've said I hope Coote gets the help he needs. Anyone can make bad personal decisions and no good ever came from drug use whether recreational or addiction.

In terms of football, he's just a very poor referee. We didn't need this scandal to make us aware of that.
Cannabis use certainly did me some good


though that wasn't the reason i started <laugh>
 
I think he should be fired for his comments anyway tbh as it's indicative of a bias. The drug thing is less relevant for me just looks terrible.

I actually thought the comments could be whitewashed
.
He only referred to our performance v bunrely as Liverpool were ****. That was blown up as being derogatory in general.

He skirted the klopp one just about in calling him names but also saying he had his way of dealing with him as a result which as to blank the man. Again not a smoking gun.

The fact he's on the back end of his trip and looks stoned while he is saying never release thst video is the really stupid stuff that will get him fired imo
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ivan Dobsky
I actually thought the comments could be whitewashed
.
He only referred to our performance v bunrely as Liverpool were ****. That was blown up as being derogatory in general.

He skirted the klopp one just about in calling him names but also saying he had his way of dealing with him as a result which as to blank the man. Again not a smoking gun.

The fact he's on the back end of his trip and looks stoned while he is saying never release thst video is the really stupid stuff that will get him fired imo

Think everyone has forgotten as well just what a bloody awful decision it was - a nailed-on pen that Coote had to be blind not to give, and VAR being to timid to challenge him. But it was a run-of-the mill **** up (for Coote), not in the same ballpark as his mega tosspottery re the Virgil case, or the VAR watching golf on another screen in the Diaz incident.
 
Think everyone has forgotten as well just what a bloody awful decision it was - a nailed-on pen that Coote had to be blind not to give, and VAR being to timid to challenge him. But it was a run-of-the mill **** up (for Coote), not in the same ballpark as his mega tosspottery re the Virgil case, or the VAR watching golf on another screen in the Diaz incident.

Easily the worst and most corrupt decision
 
I sit at a desk all day, we drug and alcohol test every new employee and do random testing every month


Then there are employers like my employer. They say they test randomly, but they never test anyone.

I think it's so if they suspect something they can then "randomly" test the person they suspect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ivan Dobsky
The Premier league is treating the matter with caution as they do not want David Coote to have mental break down.
Yeah, er, he's the victim in all this. :emoticon-0138-think

Getting the impression now that he's the PGMOL's human shield. :emoticon-0112-wonde


We all know he's guilty, but they're protecting their own until judgement has passed. I think that's fair. As long as they come to the correct judgement in the end and don't try to spare him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ivan Dobsky
Possibly controversial but I don't see why referees shouldn't be able to consume drugs in their own time tbh.

Not that different to alcohol in that if they hammer it the night before it'll have an impact on their performance but outside of that I see no good reason for it.


I don't think you're wrong entirely... I'm no expert but from my Google Fu I read that cocaine in small recreational amounts probably won't impact his abilities the next day.... If he's snorting a lot of the stuff that's different it can impact judgement and change personality.

So my own opion, if he's snorting occasionally, I don't care.

I also don't think he can ever reasonably be expected to judge any Liverpool game or that of a points rival ever again due to his declared hatred.... I'm not naive enough to believe he is the only biased ref... He's just the only ref we know who they're biased against out their own mouth. He's allowed to be a biased turd...


Really the only thing that bothers me about all this is that, not only has he admitted a bias, but results have shown that Liverpool do much worse when he's the ref. That shows his bias is translated on to the field. If he said he hates Liverpool and Scousers and German ****s but there wasn't a statistical difference in outcomes... I wouldn't care. Even if he snorts cocaine occasionally
 
  • Like
Reactions: saintanton
Latest - apparently giving yellows to win his mates bets <doh>

If there is a source for this - I'm ****ing praying there is - then it's no wonder the PGMOL are using him as a human shield and going big on the 'He's the victim here - and so are we' horseshit. Time for the National Crime Agency to get involved. :emoticon-0112-wonde
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zanjinho
If there is a source for this - I'm ****ing praying there is - then it's no wonder the PGMOL are using him as a human shield and going big on the 'He's the victim here - and so are we' horseshit. Time for the National Crime Agency to get involved. :emoticon-0112-wonde

everyone running with it:

(edit: looks like the scum broke it, but it’s everywhere now)

https://www.skysports.com/amp/footb...ving-yellow-card-before-leeds-west-brom-match

Said the other week that I feel a monster scandal on the way…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ivan Dobsky
He’s come out and denied it…. Although he also denied the video was him initially and then back tracked. Not an unreasonable claim given what’s already come about
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ivan Dobsky