dani ayala

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

I_Clean_holtys_boots

Active Member
May 8, 2011
3,083
7
38
Sudbury
Reportedly in talks with forest! I'm happy with who hughton has brought in but if this is the case plus vaughan maybe going elsewhere I would be inclined to question his views on some of our players!
 
can't see this happening, he's a big prospect, but if it does I imagine we will be looking to take Forest to the cleaners over him which could be good business in the short term.
 
i can only assume that if he leaves curtis davies or an other will come in. personally i'd keep him. i don't rate ayala anywhere near as much as i do ryan bennett but i do think he is very promising.
 
If this is true it is said to be a season long loan, which may not be a bad thing. He was injured for much of last season and was liable to conceding free kicks and penalties. Perhaps some time at a decent championship club will help him develop. But it has all the signs of a slow news day at the Evening Post.
 
The numbers of player's that we need to bring in seem to be racking up if we send out ayala and another striker out on loan. I can only assume that he will have players lined up to replace them, if we dont replace them then we will be in a spot of bother.
 
could be a good move for him, i also rate him though.
Surely would only be a loan as he is very young?

when i first read the subject matter i wasn't concentrating and thought it said dani pacheco!
 
If this is true it is said to be a season long loan, which may not be a bad thing. He was injured for much of last season and was liable to conceding free kicks and penalties. Perhaps some time at a decent championship club will help him develop ......

<ok> ^This
 
He's only made 7 appearances for us, so he really does need to get playing regularly to develop that potential. Since I think we'll see a very settled CB pairing once CH's mind is made up (Turner and Bennett I'd guess, and barring injuries of course), this seems a sensible idea to me. We would still have Ward and Barnett in reserve.
 
I don't rate Ayala...yet. Not seen enough good things to rate him as highly as some do. Yet, Lambert loved him, people rave about his potential, so i'd be surprised if we let him go already. If this is true, he must be getting money in for Davies.
 
As long as we don't change our transfer strategy and go back to getting several loan players in a la he who shall not be named. Young, hungry permanents is what we must continue to go after IMO <ok>
 
will say though, the 2 rumoured to be going out on loan are 2 who had serious injury problems last season. Also i noticed james nursery tweeted the other day that Hughton wants to get rid of vaughan as hes on big wages and wants to make room for more of a goal threat which he is looking abroad for supposedly and needs all the spare cash possible!
 
He's only made 7 appearances for us, so he really does need to get playing regularly to develop that potential. Since I think we'll see a very settled CB pairing once CH's mind is made up (Turner and Bennett I'd guess, and barring injuries of course), this seems a sensible idea to me. We would still have Ward and Barnett in reserve.

This.
 
Don't want to see Ayala go.

I think he's great on what I've seen of him, would much rather have him than Turner because from what I can make out he's a much better footballer.