Agree. Although, as he appears to have no dignity and the emotional make up of a teenage girl, he'll continue. Even his greatest, bestest internet 'mates' seem to absent in defending him. OMG ROFL LOL - as Happy would himself write.
Happy Tiger. I will ask the question again that I put to you in December, which you failed to reply to. Maybe you could answer it this time. Are the number of your brain cells the same as your avatar, or maybe it's a photograph of yourself. .
Yeah, noticed that they are melting away- we all know who they are, the ones that simpering Happy loves to agree with. Now it's just the hardcore attention seeking contrarians and loons........ Wonder who'll be last to surrender?
Thanks for the in depth response Obi, I honestly never expected that at all. The post was just some musings from me, and I was curious if people would react to the post or the poster, and the usual suspects didn't disappoint. I did know what type of reaction I'd get, but there's more than enough bullshit posted on this and other forums about the Allams that I thought a little back would be funny, and it was! Partly tongue in cheek and partly not, so it was no surprise it went over some folks heads. I wasn't musing that the Supporters Trust would buy the club, rather than some mysterious and as yet, unnamed backer of CTWD would step in and the Trust (name TBD) would end up with a % after helping quite cleverly to see the Allams off. Thankfully you've put that concern to rest, so ta. Not sure why or how you think the club could ever be owned 100% by the fans, the majority could barely run a bath let alone a football club.
We have these things called "jobs". It keeps us busy. You should try it sometime. Anything that keeps you off forums is a good thing after all.
Oh you are so superior Happy Tiger , we are not worthy etc. I'm surprised you would waste your time here if you have such a low opinion of other Hull City fans
Ah right. Have they just attained these jobs then as they were posting like **** until something happened recently.
Hate to break to you princess, but it's now always about you. That post you quoted in fact, was (and it shoulda been obvious) was aimed at Aggron. Oh I assumed you meant Dazed and Chazz, you mean....there are more of us than just us 3?! Bitch please! Just because we aren't on here posting constantly doesn't mean we gave up, or stopped caring or stopped loving you. Besides, I've noticed you don't actually need us around for you to post about us, or does it feel empty when you do that?
I hate to break this to you princess, but this is a forum and people can respond to whatever they ****ing like...
I'm glad some of your worst stuff isn't aimed at me Happy Tiger , I'm not sure how CTWD put up with it though OLM must have the patience of a saint some of the stuff he gets on here from you in particular , you obviously don't have the excuse of people like Chazz as you can do sensible posts as well
****ing hell, they're all at it now. He quoted a post I made in reply to Aggron and it's hardly an exclusive club I'm in where people have a low opinion of him. I'm indifferent to Newland, so no, I don't have a low opinion of other City fans, just a few special ones. While I've gotten your attention, how come EG can't get a simple answer to "what next for CTWD?" on CI? Oh and what happened to your post of yesterday morning of "We're just waiting to see the question posed before we start to counter it"? Had you actually seen the question when you made the CTWD statement? Should we count that as a lie from you, or from CTWD?
I do not know the individuals who run the group, I personally have no doubts about the HONEST intentions of CTWD. I do disagree with some of the posts made in their name. The fact is that like any group there will be deviations from the original plan. Whilst I support that idea of supporter involvement, I cannot see the Allams sitting around a table with any of the committee of CTWD any time soon.
What happens next with CTWD will be decided by it's committee once they are appointed at next months AGM, I can't answer for them. We are waiting to hear the question before we counter it obviously and I'm not obliged to detail to you what I do or don't know. You'll find out soon enough.
There has to be something of intelligence to debate before b can be carried forward and the above clearly is not in this category.
