He was the first test captain since 1986 to win the Ashes in 2005. He's also scored over 600 runs against them.
I'm all for attacking exciting cricket but sometimes you just need to hang in there and pick of the bad balls
Jonathan Agnew made a very good and balanced point the other day.
He said that when Stokes took over, England badly needed the new approach and he was right. We were wimping our way to defeat after defeat with the occasional timid draw.
Even at it's height though, England"s fire cracker batting had periods of caution before the onslaughts. This has been forgotten.
Agnew was spot on. But now, though earlier almost every team struggled against such a fierce approach, teams have worked out a way to play against it. Apart from the brilliant Starc, who could swing a lump of coal and take wickets in any conditions, the bowlers have not had to work for their wickets.
They just put the ball eight or ten inches outside off and on a length and after a couple of boundaries the wickets will fall, especially the new men in. The bowlers are no longer being hit off their length. If that doesn't do it, just bang it in and invite a hook. It's hard to score sixes in Australia as the grounds are so much bigger.
One thing I would say is that almost all the batsmen have been stuck in their crease for too long. Fair enough against Starc who is very quick, but against the others getting the feet forward is a must and too many have perished timidly standing back to medium/quick paced, though accurate bowling. It's another thing they have forgotten.
Happening at Perth was one thing. But happening again is another.
As in football, you can't always play the way you want to. The other lot will sooner or later work out a way to stop you.