Off Topic Coyote Canyon Game Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well if we hang him tonight and he is a bandit, we can look at the people who have agreed with my theory (Sebb, myself and Obi) with renewed suspicion, and go after them. (though not me because I am town affiliated).

If he is a townie, then Gerrez and GCB are ****ing dead men!

<ok>
So either way we will learn a lot tonight.....lets keep it with ACS and see what happens.

ACS

If you are town, Sorry dude I tried.
If you are a bandit then, :emoticon-0146-punch
 
Well if we hang him tonight and he is a bandit, we can look at the people who have agreed with my theory (Sebb, myself and Obi) with renewed suspicion, and go after them. (though not me because I am town affiliated).

If he is a townie, then Gerrez and GCB are ****ing dead men!

<ok>
So either way we will learn a lot tonight.....lets keep it with ACS and see what happens.

ACS

If you are town, Sorry dude I tried.
If you are a bandit then, :emoticon-0146-punch

You tried to link me to GCB in accusing ACS before until I pointed out that I hadn't accused ACS once, in fact I'd argued against it. Now its bloody obvious he is guilty considering the actions from last night and my comment (just moments before this from you), you decide to reintroduce that theory. you just made yourself look extremely dodgy imo.
 
You tried to link me to GCB in accusing ACS before until I pointed out that I hadn't accused ACS once, in fact I'd argued against it. Now its bloody obvious he is guilty considering the actions from last night and my comment (just moments before this from you), you decide to reintroduce that theory. you just made yourself look extremely dodgy imo.
No mate, you did.
You are not arguing against it now though are you ya melonhead.
Post 3181 "Correct, it is silly. He is 100% a bandit"
So I made myself look dodgy for saying that if ACS is a townie, and we hang him, you should be looked at for claiming he is 100% bandit.
Well dodgy that <laugh>
 
To be fair, I think the debate has now opened il to whether his is bandit or town.

Nope. There is no debate. He's claimed to hold two different roles in this game in the last hour. He's changing his opinion more often than you eat pies!
 
It might be a player picked at random who gets lynched instead, and unfortunately for them it was a fellow bandit.

Nev, need clarification on the rules mate.

The rules don't state who will be lynched. This is one of the things that it has been pointed out to me wasn't explained fully or clearly in the rules - I knew they should have been longer!!! <doh>
 
No mate, you did.
You are not arguing against it now though are you ya melonhead.
Post 3181 "Correct, it is silly. He is 100% a bandit"
So I made myself look dodgy for saying that if ACS is a townie, and we hang him, you should be looked at for claiming he is 100% bandit.
Well dodgy that <laugh>

Which was was waht i was alluding to with "moments before your comment" <doh>

You jumped on it super quick so it was obviously an angle you wanted to push, only backed up by the fact you tried to push it before!

I know ACS is guilty because of a claim he has made. The priest will know he is guilty for the very same reason!
 
Which was the comment "moments before you comment" <doh>

You jumped on it super quick so it was obviously an angle you wanted to push, only backed up by the fact you tried to push it before!

I know ACS is guilty because of a claim he has made. The priest will know he is guilty for the very same reason!

Of course its an angle I want to push <doh>
If you say he is 100% bandit and he turns out to be innocent, we would be ******ed not to suspect you.
You only have to worry if he is innocent.
If he is a bandit, as you claim, you will have vindicated yourself. And he is 100% bandit remember, so you have nothing to worry about.
Why are you so defensive.
 
Nope. There is no debate. He's claimed to hold two different roles in this game in the last hour. He's changing his opinion more often than you eat pies!
There is debate if there is ANY uncertainty. I was 100% sure he was a bandit until about an hour or so ago, now I just don't know.

We can't just dismiss a potential bandit scheme, even if it seems far fetched. I have Albert at about 80% bandit, 20 doubt and he still has my vote. But I'm not yet in a position to say there is no debate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bodinki
Of course its an angle I want to push <doh>
If you say he is 100% bandit and he turns out to be innocent, we would be ******ed not to suspect you.
You only have to worry if he is innocent.
If he is a bandit, as you claim, you will have vindicated yourself. And he is 100% bandit remember, so you have nothing to worry about.
Why are you so defensive.
I also claimed he is 100% bandit. Of course we can never be sure, only Neville, ACS and any teammates of his know his real role. But we base our views on what ACS and other players do and say.

So in our eyes he seems a dead cert for a bandit. If he somehow turns out to be town I don't expect to get lynched myself because ACS did many things in this game to look guilty. It does happen occasionally that a townie acts in a way that makes him look guilty and he gets killed, but that's his own fault. If you're town then you need to give a proper defense of yourself, not claim multiple roles and act guilty.
 
The rules don't state who will be lynched. This is one of the things that it has been pointed out to me wasn't explained fully or clearly in the rules - I knew they should have been longer!!! <doh>
So, potentially a bandit team fck up then! Hence no other Donaldson actions.
Which means McGraw may have recruited instead? Which is, I think, what Tennis was trying to say earlier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sir Tennisball
Of course its an angle I want to push <doh>
If you say he is 100% bandit and he turns out to be innocent, we would be ******ed not to suspect you.
You only have to worry if he is innocent.
If he is a bandit, as you claim, you will have vindicated yourself. And he is 100% bandit remember, so you have nothing to worry about.
Why are you so defensive.

I'm not being defensive, I'm attacking you!

Remember that ACS's tactic throughout this game as been exactly what you've just done too. I knew GCB to be innocent until last night (because of a potential recruit) as did the priest (who can't be recruited) but so I've witnessed ACS going for him. You've joined in that attack on GCB and now (at a second attempt) you've gone for me.

You're right, I have nothing to worry about because ACS is guilty. You quickly got defensive when i pointed out you'd aligned yourself with ACS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sir Tennisball
There is debate if there is ANY uncertainty. I was 100% sure he was a bandit until about an hour or so ago, now I just don't know.

We can't just dismiss a potential bandit scheme, even if it seems far fetched. I have Albert at about 80% bandit, 20 doubt and he still has my vote. But I'm not yet in a position to say there is no debate.

Read what ACS has put in the last hour or so!
 
I also claimed he is 100% bandit. Of course we can never be sure, only Neville, ACS and any teammates of his know his real role. But we base our views on what ACS and other players do and say.

So in our eyes he seems a dead cert for a bandit. If he somehow turns out to be town I don't expect to get lynched myself because ACS did many things in this game to look guilty. It does happen occasionally that a townie acts in a way that makes him look guilty and he gets killed, but that's his own fault. If you're town then you need to give a proper defense of yourself, not claim multiple roles and act guilty.
And not take swipes at fellow townies who then look suspicious. He is a liability.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.