Off Topic Coyote Canyon Game Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Obi Wanaldum said:
Inactive Players

If any player is inactive their role will still play its part in the game. They will still fire back when attacked and will still trade if they are tradesmen.

If the inactive player is a member of the gangs then the Gang leader can assign tasks for that player as if they were taking part. It is the gang leader's responsibility to notify all team actions on the team board. If a gang leader is inactive at nightfall then the next in command can assign roles.

If it becomes obvious that key roles are not participating, and it is affecting the game, then any uninvestigated tradesmen may have their roles swapped for a key role. This will not affect the running of the game. However, this can only be done in the first 2 days. After that point, or if not enough tradesmen survived night one, then the game will run as normal and the affected team will need to cope with the disadvantage and hope their player turns up.
Click to expand...
So basically, in most cases their role just sits there.
 
Obi Wanaldum said:
Inactive Players

If any player is inactive their role will still play its part in the game. They will still fire back when attacked and will still trade if they are tradesmen.

If the inactive player is a member of the gangs then the Gang leader can assign tasks for that player as if they were taking part. It is the gang leader's responsibility to notify all team actions on the team board. If a gang leader is inactive at nightfall then the next in command can assign roles.

If it becomes obvious that key roles are not participating, and it is affecting the game, then any uninvestigated tradesmen may have their roles swapped for a key role. This will not affect the running of the game. However, this can only be done in the first 2 days. After that point, or if not enough tradesmen survived night one, then the game will run as normal and the affected team will need to cope with the disadvantage and hope their player turns up.
Click to expand...

All fine if the inactive is a bad guy since their team mates can decide for them. Bit **** if the inactive player is town aligned since we have to rely on lynch votes.
 
Kloppezinho said:
Hash because he's inactive (will be dealt with tonight anyway I believe)

Chaos because he's doing peoples heads in
Click to expand...

This.

Chaos is just being himself. Don't get read on him being bad guy. Obi I had as good guy but vote has no logic. Now suspicious. Also same for Bisc.

Looking at Bod or RHC or Valley as being grouped and bad guys.

I vote RHC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Warmir Pouchov and Obi Wan
Obi Wanaldum said:
Some seem VERY keen to NOT lynch Tash. People who often say target the quiet ones.
Click to expand...

I'm usually one of those that target the quiet ones but in this instance I was convinced that Nev had said he would remove them if that were the case. Seems I was wrong though so I will probably change my vote at some point.

Question is, what does killing Hash or Chaos tell us? Not that I have any other suggestion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obi Wan
Kloppezinho said:
I'm usually one of those that target the quiet ones but in this instance I was convinced that Nev had said he would remove them if that were the case. Seems I was wrong though so I will probably change my vote at some point.

Question is, what does killing Hash or Chaos tell us? Not that I have any other suggestion.
Click to expand...
It tells a lot about those who defended them, possibly more than those who voted for them.
 
Kloppezinho said:
@Less Hope Than Neville

Can you clarify what actions you're going to take with inactives please? I'm sure I read in the pre-game thread that you'd give them two days before dealing with them :huh:
Click to expand...

If anybody has not shown up in the game (either on here or QT boards) then I can replace them with uninvestigated traders (who will not know who anyone else is). If I do that then a game character would remain as the trader - actions allocated at random - and would fire back if attacked.

However, I cannot tell you at the moment if anybody is inactive/quiet or just active in the background. I will confirm at nightfall tonight if any inactive players were in the game.
 
Sebb's Campaign Manager said:
This.

Chaos is just being himself. Don't get read on him being bad guy. Obi I had as good guy but vote has no logic. Now suspicious. Also same for Bisc.

Looking at Bod or RHC or Valley as being grouped and bad guys.

I vote RHC.
Click to expand...
Fair point Sebb. One of my least logical votes, more from the heart.
 
Who's this Tennis guy that has voted for me...anyone got a link to him?

Find it odd, of all the people that i have bantered with, some guy who hardly appears on here votes for me, love to hear the reasons LOL - he can't use spamming the board because he's never ****ing here <doh>

Hence i'm going to change my vote and AFC gets off the hook for now...

TENNIS


come out, come out, who ever you are <laugh>
 
Less Hope Than Neville said:
If anybody has not shown up in the game (either on here or QT boards) then I can replace them with uninvestigated traders (who will not know who anyone else is). If I do that then a game character would remain as the trader - actions allocated at random - and would fire back if attacked.

However, I cannot tell you at the moment if anybody is inactive/quiet or just active in the background. I will confirm at nightfall tonight if any inactive players were in the game.
Click to expand...

But would you removed inactive players from the game?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obi Wan
Less Hope Than Neville said:
If anybody has not shown up in the game (either on here or QT boards) then I can replace them with uninvestigated traders (who will not know who anyone else is). If I do that then a game character would remain as the trader - actions allocated at random - and would fire back if attacked.

However, I cannot tell you at the moment if anybody is inactive/quiet or just active in the background. I will confirm at nightfall tonight if any inactive players were in the game.
Click to expand...
Don't we need traders too? Or am I missing smething?
 
brb said:
Who's this Tennis guy that has voted for me...anyone got a link to him?

Find it odd, of all the people that i have bantered with, some guy who hardly appears on here votes for me, love to hear the reasons LOL - he can't use spamming the board because he's never ****ing here <doh>

Hence i'm going to change my vote and AFC gets off the hook for now...

TENNIS


come out, come out, who ever you are <laugh>
Click to expand...

He lives in South Africa so hardly appears later on <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obi Wan
Caught up the last couple of pages.

Why are we killing Tash? Him being inactive doesn't make him evil, best to leave him for tomorrow at least as nev may take action and switch his role if he is important to the game, otherwise we could just be killing someone useful.

Chaos has been the most suspicious but at the same time seems to have a lot of people backing him as this being his normal style. Can't say I'd be bothered seeing him swing as I don't think he's being very helpful. But that said I'm not sure about the current position. Might be worth looking at other possibilities. There's still plenty of time left with this many votes for things to change.
 
Okay, I'm going to change my vote to RHC since he's the only person I have slight knowledge on and he's more likely to be in a bad team (10 players) than good 7 players). We'll find out about Valley then too.
 
afcftw said:
Caught up the last couple of pages.

Why are we killing Tash? Him being inactive doesn't make him evil, best to leave him for tomorrow at least as nev may take action and switch his role if he is important to the game, otherwise we could just be killing someone useful.

Chaos has been the most suspicious but at the same time seems to have a lot of people backing him as this being his normal style. Can't say I'd be bothered seeing him swing as I don't think he's being very helpful. But that said I'm not sure about the current position. Might be worth looking at other possibilities. There's still plenty of time left with this many votes for things to change.
Click to expand...

Your reason for voting for Chaos is the same reason people usually vote for you <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obi Wan and afcftw
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back