Off Topic Coyote Canyon Game Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Less Hope Than Neville said:
Vote Summary

Tash 5 (ACS, Biscan, Chaos, Jakarta, Obi)
Chaos 4 (AFC, RHC, Bodanki, Mikey)
AFC 1 (Brb,)
Obi 2 (GCB, DPP)
Brb 1 (Tennis)
RHC 1 (Mitro)
Click to expand...

So, we're going for Tash because he's absent (despite Nev clearly telling us that he'll deal with inactive posters) and Chaos because, well, he's causing Chaos.

[HASHTAG]#sensiblegameplan[/HASHTAG] <doh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Magnet and Warmir Pouchov
Captainchaos. said:
Favour time buster
Click to expand...

You know what I do think you are an innocent. However based on this massive jump on you I feel the safest kill is RHC. So I think you and any other innocents should switch to him. Lets see if we can draw a few more out by causing the swing against you. Why are we killing Tash? Just because he is quiet?
 
Kloppezinho said:
So, we're going for Tash because he's absent (despite Nev clearly telling us that he'll deal with inactive posters) and Chaos because, well, he's causing Chaos.

[HASHTAG]#sensiblegameplan[/HASHTAG] <doh>
Click to expand...


Obviously the people voting for me are a gang at least whatever happens you know that
 
Mitrosexual said:
You know what I do think you are an innocent. However based on this massive jump on you I feel the safest kill is RHC. So I think you and any other innocents should switch to him. Lets see if we can draw a few more out by causing the swing against you. Why are we killing Tash? Just because he is quiet?
Click to expand...

I can't because the votes for me are staying im going down

But promise me one thing folks and kill afc and his rabble if you get the chance once im dead
 
Captainchaos. said:
I can't because the votes for me are staying im going down
Click to expand...

I get that fella, but we are then not targeting any of the three who targeted you? Which means we miss out on a great opportunity to discover if that was team. I'm mainly looking at the likes of Obi, GCB, DPP, whose current votes don't seem to have any logic.
 
Kloppezinho said:
So, we're going for Tash because he's absent (despite Nev clearly telling us that he'll deal with inactive posters) and Chaos because, well, he's causing Chaos.

[HASHTAG]#sensiblegameplan[/HASHTAG] <doh>
Click to expand...
Got any beter ideas? You keep saying you've posted loads, but I haven't seen much by way of 'input'
 
Sorry I've just realised GCB did switch to bodanki which does follow same logic as my own but with different poster.
 
Obi Wanaldum said:
Got any beter ideas? You keep saying you've posted loads, but I haven't seen much by way of 'input'
Click to expand...

I've openly told you what I thought (which granted wasn't much) after you asked me this morning.

I just think voting for a inactive that will be dealt with anyway is a waste of a day and lets the bad guys have a free night.

Voting for Chaos I understand. I don't necessarily agree but can't say I'll sad to see him hang either.

I think people are scared of being the first to vote in case its the SK <whistle>
 
Mitrosexual said:
I get that fella, but we are then not targeting any of the three who targeted you? Which means we miss out on a great opportunity to discover if that was team. I'm mainly looking at the likes of Obi, GCB, DPP, whose current votes don't seem to have any logic.
Click to expand...
I explained my logic. Tash always does this. Signs ul and doesn't bother. He's adding nothing, so let's at least clear the dead wood. If you are CERTAIN about somebody who WANTS to play then fairenough but I know fromexperience that it's **** when ypu want to be active and get killed off while some body who isn't interested stays in. Quiet players is one thing, non players is something else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captainchaos.
Obi Wanaldum said:
I explained my logic. Tash always does this. Signs ul and doesn't bother. He's adding nothing, so let's at least clear the dead wood. If you are CERTAIN about somebody who WANTS to play then fairenough but I know fromexperience that it's **** when ypu want to be active and get killed off while some body who isn't interested stays in. Quiet players is one thing, non players is something else.
Click to expand...


I agree
 
Kloppezinho said:
I've openly told you what I thought (which granted wasn't much) after you asked me this morning.

I just think voting for a inactive that will be dealt with anyway is a waste of a day and lets the bad guys have a free night.

Voting for Chaos I understand. I don't necessarily agree but can't say I'll sad to see him hang either.

I think people are scared of being the first to vote in case its the SK <whistle>
Click to expand...
So that was a vote?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Super G Ted'inho
@Less Hope Than Neville

Can you clarify what actions you're going to take with inactives please? I'm sure I read in the pre-game thread that you'd give them two days before dealing with them :huh:
 
How the **** have Musty and Sebb not got a single vote when at least one of them is guaranteed bad <doh>

As usual people are more interested in chatting ****, then voting for each other for chatting ****, then revenge voting the person who voted for the person who chatted ****

What was the starting point for Tash or Chaos to even be voted for in the first place?
 
astro(Klopp's footbo)naut said:
How the **** have Musty and Sebb not got a single vote when at least one of them is guaranteed bad <doh>

As usual people are more interested in chatting ****, then voting for each other for chatting ****, then revenge voting the person who voted for the person who chatted ****

What was the starting point for Tash or Chaos to even be voted for in the first place?
Click to expand...

Hash because he's inactive (will be dealt with tonight anyway I believe)

Chaos because he's doing peoples heads in
 
Inactive Players

If any player is inactive their role will still play its part in the game. They will still fire back when attacked and will still trade if they are tradesmen.

If the inactive player is a member of the gangs then the Gang leader can assign tasks for that player as if they were taking part. It is the gang leader's responsibility to notify all team actions on the team board. If a gang leader is inactive at nightfall then the next in command can assign roles.

If it becomes obvious that key roles are not participating, and it is affecting the game, then any uninvestigated tradesmen may have their roles swapped for a key role. This will not affect the running of the game. However, this can only be done in the first 2 days. After that point, or if not enough tradesmen survived night one, then the game will run as normal and the affected team will need to cope with the disadvantage and hope their player turns up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back