It won’t guarantee it but it reduces the risk. We don’t have proof or degree yet but experience from all previous vaccines showed a significant effect.Having the vaccination doesn't mean you won't pass it on
It won’t guarantee it but it reduces the risk. We don’t have proof or degree yet but experience from all previous vaccines showed a significant effect.Having the vaccination doesn't mean you won't pass it on
It won’t guarantee it but it reduces the risk. We don’t have proof or degree yet but experience from all previous vaccines showed a significant effect.
Only if people wash their hands. We all know how that'll go...
There are a lot of conspiracy bullshit out there so I understand the argument for forcing through compliance, I just think it's **** to force people when it's not guaranteed to protect catching our carrying.
I think the politicians should stay well clear. The human rights/freedom of choice has been tested in the highest courts of the land and the public interest has always come on top. I think it is about health and safety. I was involved in a case when the patients of a surgeon sued when they got infected, Employers have the duty to protect their clients and patients. The individual is free to choose to be vaccinated or not but they cannot be free to choose to put another at risk. “No jab, no job” to put it very crudely.
BTW no vaccine provide a guarantee.
I remember the arguments against forcing people to use seatbelts. I presume you don’t agree with forcing surgeons to be vaccinated too.I'll be getting once I can anyway. Just don't agree with forcing people.
I remember the arguments against forcing people to use seatbelts. I presume you don’t agree with forcing surgeons to be vaccinated too.
Can't say I've thought about it. Makes sense though since they're physically entering people's bodies. They wear enough PPE to make it lower risk (both parties) and I'd guess the surgeons are keen to protect themselves anyway.
some can't for medical reasons apparently .
It's a slippery slope to force people into vaccination, not all parents have their children vaccinated and this puts others at risk. There has been, however, an ongoing argument about serious lifelong side effects of some of the childhood vaccines. You want people to have freedom of choice but you also have to weigh up protection of the individual against protection of society at large. Enough people choosing not to vaccinate puts everyone at risk. Given the catastrophic effects of this pandemic, it's hard to find an argument in favour of an individual's right not to be vaccinated.
There is still an argument against childhood vaccinations (not talking about the crazies or conspiracists) even if the argument is not science based but rumour or anecdotal based it's still an argument. It might not be 'legitimate' but it's enough to make some parents fearful. If there weren't some parents with genuine concerns then more children would be getting vaccinated.when I come to power mate. It'll make china look like a free for all.
There is no argument btw about ongoing side effects. there are peoepl with zero evidence making baseless statements and there are scientists gather data and reporting.
anti vaxxers are the ULTIMATE decadence. poelp who never experienced poilo, smallpox, or a whole range of diseases such as measles, mumps etc etc. It is the height of stupidity and frankly they ought to be uninsureable in the US (where most of this starts)
If they couldn't get health care without paying massively themsevles they'd be pretty quick to shut up. if their kids were told no you didn't vaccinate no care i nthis hosptial for you they'd be first in line to scream discrimination.
Its actually very easy find an argument. They are decandent nonsense spouters and the first to be in line when they want someone to solve their problems for them.
I don't think people should be forced to have it eitherI don’t agree they should force anyone to have it. Unless it’s vital that for the job they do they are protected.
I don't think people should be forced to have it either![]()
I've had my vaccine, yay, and nobody ( on here) has said they will refuse it , just a bit of concern over being forced. I understand that. I do think though that maybe using the word forced is inaccurate, given the discussion so far it's more like being bribed, as in no vaccine > curtailment of some activities.I don't have to force anyone to eat either
they do cos they have to.
Vaccination foregiveness is like giving kids ice cream for throwing their dinner on the floor![]()
I've had my vaccine, yay, and nobody ( on here) has said they will refuse it , just a bit of concern over being forced. I understand that. I do think though that maybe using the word forced is inaccurate, given the discussion so far it's more like being bribed, as in no vaccine > curtailment of some activities.
Btw where children are concerned, no dinner - no ice cream is fair enough but a bit of bribery (in the right circumstances) works wonders.
I remember the arguments against forcing people to use seatbelts. I presume you don’t agree with forcing surgeons to be vaccinated too.
There's always the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 that provides that any individual cannot be required to undergo medical treatment, including vaccination. It doesn't prevent an employer from asking an employee to consent to a contractual requirement to undergo vaccination before offering the employee work but it puts into question whether consent was freely given. If it wasn't freely given then the Act would apply.i'm just say'n
not accus'n
a requirement for a job is not bribery.
I think the word forced is being used inaccurately. All medical students are required to have proof of a whole slew of vaccinations before being accepted on a medical degree course. They will also be given the hep B vaccine and be tested for HIV, hep B and hep C. The latter three won't stop them being accepted on a medical degree but will limit where they can work. It depends on how you choose to look at and interpret it. What to you (or anyone else) looks like force, to others is a requirement. The same with your suggestion of a vaccine passport being sinister.Forced vaccination is against the Nuremberg Code. Health passports are not passports, they are permits. A permit to buy food, go to a pub, be able to participate in society. If you don't think that is sinister your brain is made of melting butter.
I've had my vaccine, yay, and nobody ( on here) has said they will refuse it , just a bit of concern over being forced. I understand that. I do think though that maybe using the word forced is inaccurate, given the discussion so far it's more like being bribed, as in no vaccine > curtailment of some activities.
Btw where children are concerned, no dinner - no ice cream is fair enough but a bit of bribery (in the right circumstances) works wonders.
I’m refusing it as I don’t need it. Children don’t need it either.