yeah it's us dwelling on itIt's gone, its passed. Dont dwell on it as Sucky has

yeah it's us dwelling on it![]()
Don't trust the MAINSTREAM MEDIA!You must log in or register to see media

So about 0.27% of double vaccinated people versus 0.4% of non-vaccinated despite the average ages of the respective groups. Well done.
This being Scottish data where the life expectancy is about 38 and they live on deep fried pizzas.
Don't shoot the messenger fella......Happy Friday init
I’m shooting the **** misleading headline, you silly ****.
Happy Friday to you also.
Not my cup of tea but he's saying the right things.....doubt is creeping in by the vaccinated.
You must log in or register to see media
I agree to a certain degree of what he's saying, simply because it was my thoughts at the time, which were, hang on, I've got the vaccine, but now you are still going to apply restrictions to me when I travel, such as having a test which is going to cost me money. Hence, I'm like well fook this then, I'm not travelling if you are going to charge me some stupid charge for doing so. Another concern was it also creates a class divide. However, those restrictions have changed now, so maybe whenever that clip was recorded, they were going through the same process. So I agree in principle, but over time things returned to normal. I hasten to add though, it was never a reason not to have the vaccine.
i wonder who will explain revenue and profit to our resident conspiracy guy
It comes after AstraZeneca, which said it will not take a profit from its coronavirus shot during the pandemic, unveiled plans to set up a separate arm for vaccines and antibody treatments which focus on Covid-19.
lol not really a good argument at the moment
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-59256223
AstraZeneca has started to move away from providing its Covid-19 vaccine to countries on a not-for-profit basis.
The drugs giant has signed a series of for-profit agreements for next year, and expects to make a modest income from the vaccine, it said.
The company had previously said it would only start to make money from the vaccine when Covid-19 was no longer a pandemic.
Its chief executive Pascal Soriot said the disease was becoming endemic.
The jab will continue to be supplied on a not-for-profit basis to poorer countries.
Mr Soriot had said previously: "We decided to provide it at no profit, because our top priority was to protect global health."
Admittedly, they are still doing right by poorer countries and to be fair i don't blame them for wanting to make a profit but they will start profiting going forward from the wealthier nations![]()
from the article Aber postedSo what I have posted previously is factually correct. Also the figures state revenue, not Vaccine profit![]()
from the article Aber posted
The company added that limited profit from the vaccine in the next quarter will offset costs related to its antibody cocktail developed to prevent and treat Covid.
tbf i suspect Aber hadn't read the full article eitheri went down about 1/3rd. My post a few days ago was that they had not made profit up to this point on vaccine, will also keep now supplying at cost to poorer nations. Can’t fault them for that.
made the classic headline read/response error.
