Coronavirus

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Boris...


  • Total voters
    24
Status
Not open for further replies.
So about 0.27% of double vaccinated people versus 0.4% of non-vaccinated despite the average ages of the respective groups. Well done.

This being Scottish data where the life expectancy is about 38 and they live on deep fried pizzas.

Don't shoot the messenger fella......Happy Friday init
 
Not my cup of tea but he's saying the right things.....doubt is creeping in by the vaccinated.

You must log in or register to see media
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Not my cup of tea but he's saying the right things.....doubt is creeping in by the vaccinated.

You must log in or register to see media

I agree to a certain degree of what he's saying, simply because it was my thoughts at the time, which were, hang on, I've got the vaccine, but now you are still going to apply restrictions to me when I travel, such as having a test which is going to cost me money. Hence, I'm like well fook this then, I'm not travelling if you are going to charge me some stupid charge for doing so. Another concern was it also creates a class divide. However, those restrictions have changed now, so maybe whenever that clip was recorded, they were going through the same process. So I agree in principle, but over time things returned to normal. I hasten to add though, it was never a reason not to have the vaccine.
 
I agree to a certain degree of what he's saying, simply because it was my thoughts at the time, which were, hang on, I've got the vaccine, but now you are still going to apply restrictions to me when I travel, such as having a test which is going to cost me money. Hence, I'm like well fook this then, I'm not travelling if you are going to charge me some stupid charge for doing so. Another concern was it also creates a class divide. However, those restrictions have changed now, so maybe whenever that clip was recorded, they were going through the same process. So I agree in principle, but over time things returned to normal. I hasten to add though, it was never a reason not to have the vaccine.

It's not changed dude.

Anyway some lying **** said the vaccine makers are not making profits from covid vaccine.........another fking bullshit claim as per usual

https://www.business-live.co.uk/manufacturing/covid-19-vaccine-sales-boosts-22145013
 
i wonder who will explain revenue and profit to our resident conspiracy guy

It comes after AstraZeneca, which said it will not take a profit from its coronavirus shot during the pandemic, unveiled plans to set up a separate arm for vaccines and antibody treatments which focus on Covid-19.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Ern and Diego
i wonder who will explain revenue and profit to our resident conspiracy guy

It comes after AstraZeneca, which said it will not take a profit from its coronavirus shot during the pandemic, unveiled plans to set up a separate arm for vaccines and antibody treatments which focus on Covid-19.

lol not really a good argument at the moment :P

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-59256223

AstraZeneca has started to move away from providing its Covid-19 vaccine to countries on a not-for-profit basis.

The drugs giant has signed a series of for-profit agreements for next year, and expects to make a modest income from the vaccine, it said.

The company had previously said it would only start to make money from the vaccine when Covid-19 was no longer a pandemic.

Its chief executive Pascal Soriot said the disease was becoming endemic.

The jab will continue to be supplied on a not-for-profit basis to poorer countries.

Mr Soriot had said previously: "We decided to provide it at no profit, because our top priority was to protect global health."


Admittedly, they are still doing right by poorer countries and to be fair i don't blame them for wanting to make a profit but they will start profiting going forward from the wealthier nations :P
 
lol not really a good argument at the moment :p

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-59256223

AstraZeneca has started to move away from providing its Covid-19 vaccine to countries on a not-for-profit basis.

The drugs giant has signed a series of for-profit agreements for next year, and expects to make a modest income from the vaccine, it said.

The company had previously said it would only start to make money from the vaccine when Covid-19 was no longer a pandemic.

Its chief executive Pascal Soriot said the disease was becoming endemic.

The jab will continue to be supplied on a not-for-profit basis to poorer countries.

Mr Soriot had said previously: "We decided to provide it at no profit, because our top priority was to protect global health."


Admittedly, they are still doing right by poorer countries and to be fair i don't blame them for wanting to make a profit but they will start profiting going forward from the wealthier nations :p

So what I have posted previously is factually correct. Also the figures state revenue, not Vaccine profit :emoticon-0148-yes:
 
from the article Aber posted
The company added that limited profit from the vaccine in the next quarter will offset costs related to its antibody cocktail developed to prevent and treat Covid.

i went down about 1/3rd. My post a few days ago was that they had not made profit up to this point on vaccine, will also keep now supplying at cost to poorer nations. Can’t fault them for that.

made the classic headline read/response error.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.