Well yeah, it is. I'll decide whether I start paying again.
Who's going to force me?
I’ve just reported you mate. Don’t answer the door if it knocks unexpectedly, is my advice
Well yeah, it is. I'll decide whether I start paying again.
Who's going to force me?
Well yeah, it is. I'll decide whether I start paying again.
Who's going to force me?
Sure, you decide not to pay it.
And they’ll decide to prosecute you.
Simply really.
Only they will, but you know best.We'll see how they get on.
I'm absolutely fine with it because I'm sure they won't.
The irony!
The irony!

Like it’s a choice lol.
You’ve moved around in rented property though mate, and have obvs escaped it.It kind of is mate. I've not bought one in over a decade.
You’ve moved around in rented property though mate, and have obvs escaped it.
The minute you buy a new TV the vendor has to notify the TV licensing authorities, and once having paid it, there’s a legally defined process for then trying to deny you no longer legally need one. Just choosing not to pay it isn’t a legal right. That’s literally it.
The only choice you have (assuming you watch TV) is to choose to break the law or not. Same as you have the choice to drink drive or not, or to purchase beak. It’s still a criminal offence and not merely a non payment issue and thus a civil matter.Who said a legal right? I'm just saying you clearly have a choice whether to pay or not as in reality it's not all that enforceable.
Take your point about renting but I know people who've lived in the same (bought) house for 20 years and never purchased one.
As long as you're not a complete ****ing idiot then there really is very little chance of you every being prosecuted for not having a TV license.
It's an incredibly outdated concept in my view anyway tbh, about time the whole thing was revamped so you purchase for what you watch.

The only choice you have (assuming you watch TV) is to choose to break the law or not. Same as you have the choice to drink drive or not, or to purchase beak. It’s still a criminal offence and not merely a non payment issue and thus a civil matter.
My point was simple, Chief thinking he had a choice to pay it or not, like you would a subscription service for example, is legally incorrect. That’s literally it for actual ****s sake![]()
No he clearly was, hence my reply to him.Yeah that's what I meant in choosing not to pay it, I'm not talking about a legal argument as I'm sure Chief wasn't. Don't think he actually believes that it's optional in those terms.
All I'm saying is there's an easy choice not to do so as your chances of being prosecuted for it are extremely small. Everyone can make that choice if they wish.
One thing you have in common, with him then.
You’ve moved around in rented property though mate, and have obvs escaped it.
The minute you buy a new TV the vendor has to notify the TV licensing authoritieS.
No he clearly was, hence my reply to him.
https://www.not606.com/threads/coronavirus.382225/page-1290#post-13947436
You’re also wrong on prosecutions as well, over 10% of ALL criminal prosecutions in this country are for TV licence evasion, and that doesn’t include all of those who just paid up after having their collar felt. 94% of all households pay, the belief that evasion is both extremely common and easy to get away with, is a complete misnomer.