If I was one of those asking the questions in that briefing, it would be to ask what exactly has changed from the day before we went into lockdown to today, so much so that the same risk of it spreading again isn't there? I'm sure the answer will be something around the R number being 0.7-0.9. The flaw in that argument is that we were at 0.7-0.9 at some point when there was no lockdown which provided the circumstances for it to grow to 4.6 at its height.
How did we all imagine or expect the stages of lockdown to be eased? How did any of the experts? Was anyone saying 2 months ago if we get it down to 350 deaths a day, 2000 infections, we can end the lockdown? One thing that I've always wondered about was how the government would deal with the lockdown by the time we got to June and financial hardship started affecting people in a big way. Would they remain resolute? In the end I think this is what the end of lockdown is all about. Maybe it's a good enough reason, I don't know anymore. But it begs the question, if the economy was always going to take a priority, why the fck did we screw ppl over the last 10 weeks in the first place? Especially if this decision comes back to bite everyone in the arse a month from now.