Coronavirus

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Boris...

  • should completely lock us down immediately and fook up all our Christmas'

    Votes: 3 12.5%

  • let the bodies stack high

    Votes: 13 54.2%

  • lock us down from the 29th to fook up Treble's plans

    Votes: 8 33.3%
  • Total voters
    24
Status
Not open for further replies.
FosseFilberto said:
It's aimed at bigger companies who are paying big money to these guys ... we've just undertaken an exercise to assess our exposure and we are more or less saying "On payroll or on your bike" ...
Click to expand...

That’s been the universal reaction. I got a letter from HMRC and did the same. Only a couple made the mistake of thinking we should pay them a higher rate on payroll than as a contractor, to cover the ‘shortfall’ of their tax liabilities. They’re now down the Jobcentre.
 
Tobes said:
It’s intended to remove the tax dodge of being a supposed contractor when you’ve only got one client and they essentially employ you on a full time basis.

Many will still escape it though, as the employer is only beholden to the new rules if 2 out of the following 3 apply - a turnover of £10m, a balance sheet value of over £5m and employing over 50 people.

Many seem to think that it’ll be solved by the employer merely taking them onto their payroll. Only, if the employer decides to test the market and see what else is out there, there’s no reason they have to employ the current ‘self employed’ worker.
Click to expand...

No i understand why its there. Its to close the loop hole of employees working for a single company and calling themselves a limited company.

I was just telling saints that its for these people but it wont necessarily apply if the company they work for do not assess them as inside. <ok>
 
FosseFilberto said:
24th June 1914 the East Lancs regiment of 720 men advanced on German guns at Serre at 7:30 am ... by 8:00 am 584 were killed, wounded or missing ...

I wasn't there Hernia ... but my mother's family came from the area and my father's uncle won a medal for distinguished conduct having joined up underage In the wake of the massacre of his peers ... don't recall many old Etonians being listed as casualties ... but a good bet that one of the over privilidged twats gave the order to test flesh against bullets ... twats like you can mock all you want but you can't change the reality with your selective stats ...
Click to expand...

Well said that man...... Ern is full of ****...... Even fking custard would tell you who took the loses and it wasn't the fking Eton brigade
 
brb said:
Probably got set up doing a deal <laugh>

Do the old bill actually still bother with that stuff these days!?
Click to expand...

I’d have thought he’d have been straight out on bail for dealing.

Someone must have ended up being cut.

Maybe him

R.I.P. Topknot. <rose>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stan and brb
I'm supposed to be going footie Saturday, fooking guaranteed every Gillingham inbred has it <laugh>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back