Coronavirus

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Boris...


  • Total voters
    24
Status
Not open for further replies.
****ing he'll Astro ... percentages are bollocks ... list numbers... a whole generation from towns like Accrington in Lancashire died due to the arrogance of entitled dickheads ordering infantry to charge entrenched German artillery ...
blah blah blah, it's war, someone makes a bad decision in pretty much every war, it still doesn;t change the fact that the officer class lost a higher proportion than the enlisted men, which kills your argument that they were safe.
I understand, you were there and still keenly feel the loss of your brothers in arms from the war 102 years ago, but a lot of the 'facts' of WW1 have no basis in reality. The fact is that the war started with cannons & cavalry and ended with tanks and planes.
 
so does it not only contractors who only have one client any more?

Its meant to catch them out. The change is that there is still some grey areas around it and the onus is on the business employing them to make the decision. If they dont want to take the risk on they will report you as inside. If they are happy to pay fines if they are investigated then they can report you as outside.

Its probably easier to investigate the number of companies than to investigate thousands of individuals
 
You must log in or register to see media

It's amazing the amount of Americans, that actually don't understand that, so it is a classic mistake, obviously not one fitting of a President!
 
Anyway, with time on my hands at the mo, I have sort of researched this disease likened to the triffids.. The 2 types of cells it attacks initially are the Goblet and Cilliated cells, let me explain, the goblet cells produce the clear mucus that lines the inside of the lungs and keeps them moist, the Cilliated cells are hairy cells that push up foreign bodies and mucus up to the throat to be spat out or swallowed, remember your stomach is one big acid pit. The Covid-19 attacks those cells and cripples them, leaving dry lungs and no ability to bring up any of the virus mucus which then eventually blocks up the inner airwaves, the results aren't good... It transmits through the skin, no airborne cases yet but it could evolve, kids can catch it as they have the recipient cells but it hasn't been know to attack their system yet. They can carry it though and pass the virus to others..<ok>

Pays to take time out and research up to date stuff..

Give this guy the nobel price.

Educating all of not606
 
  • Like
Reactions: Edelman
Its meant to catch them out. The change is that there is still some grey areas around it and the onus is on the business employing them to make the decision. If they dont want to take the risk on they will report you as inside. If they are happy to pay fines if they are investigated then they can report you as outside.

Its probably easier to investigate the number of companies than to investigate thousands of individuals

It’s intended to remove the tax dodge of being a supposed contractor when you’ve only got one client and they essentially employ you on a full time basis.

Many will still escape it though, as the employer is only beholden to the new rules if 2 out of the following 3 apply - a turnover of £10m, a balance sheet value of over £5m and employing over 50 people.

Many seem to think that it’ll be solved by the employer merely taking them onto their payroll. Only, if the employer decides to test the market and see what else is out there, there’s no reason they have to employ the current ‘self employed’ worker.
 
Can someone start an argument, we should get 5 pages done then before midnight :) [HASHTAG]#Sucky[/HASHTAG]
 
blah blah blah, it's war, someone makes a bad decision in pretty much every war, it still doesn;t change the fact that the officer class lost a higher proportion than the enlisted men, which kills your argument that they were safe.
I understand, you were there and still keenly feel the loss of your brothers in arms from the war 102 years ago, but a lot of the 'facts' of WW1 have no basis in reality. The fact is that the war started with cannons & cavalry and ended with tanks and planes.

24th June 1914 the East Lancs regiment of 720 men advanced on German guns at Serre at 7:30 am ... by 8:00 am 584 were killed, wounded or missing ...

I wasn't there Hernia ... but my mother's family came from the area and my father's uncle won a medal for distinguished conduct having joined up underage In the wake of the massacre of his peers ... don't recall many old Etonians being listed as casualties ... but a good bet that one of the over privilidged twats gave the order to test flesh against bullets ... twats like you can mock all you want but you can't change the reality with your selective stats ...
 
12% of the common soldiers died whereas 17% of the officer class died. The chances of dying in WW1 were evn greater if yu went to Eton, they lost 20%.
Or are those stats lies spread by the Lizard men?
No the junior officers were the first to go over the top and then waved every one else over making them the obvious targets
 
  • Like
Reactions: FosseFilberto
24th June 1914 the East Lancs regiment of 720 men advanced on German guns at Serre at 7:30 am ... by 8:00 am 584 were killed, wounded or missing ...

I wasn't there Hernia ... but my mother's family came from the area and my father's uncle won a medal for distinguished conduct having joined up underage In the wake of the massacre of his peers ... don't recall many old Etonians being listed as casualties ... but a good bet that one of the over privilidged twats gave the order to test flesh against bullets ... twats like you can mock all you want but you can't change the reality with your selective stats ...

Don't stand for this @Big Ern sort him out bro :emoticon-0165-muscl
 
It’s intended to remove the tax dodge of being a supposed contractor when you’ve only got one client and they essentially employ you on a full time basis.

Many will still escape it though, as the employer is only beholden to the new rules if 2 out of the following 3 apply - a turnover of £10m, a balance sheet value of over £5m and employing over 50 people.

Many seem to think that it’ll be solved by the employer merely taking them onto their payroll. Only, if the employer decides to test the market and see what else is out there, there’s no reason they have to employ the current ‘self employed’ worker.

It's aimed at bigger companies who are paying big money to these guys ... we've just undertaken an exercise to assess our exposure and we are more or less saying "On payroll or on your bike" ...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.