Coronavirus

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Boris...

  • should completely lock us down immediately and fook up all our Christmas'

    Votes: 3 12.5%

  • let the bodies stack high

    Votes: 13 54.2%

  • lock us down from the 29th to fook up Treble's plans

    Votes: 8 33.3%
  • Total voters
    24
Status
Not open for further replies.
pompeymeowth said:
Watch the video of it collapsing. It wasn't hit or severely damaged, yet it came down like a pack of cards.

I don't believe a lot of theories about 911 but T7 puzzles me.
Click to expand...

I'll have a look sometime. Like I say, I only knew of the two main towers collapsing, never followed the events to know the rest of the stuff.
 
aberdude said:
I'll give you one but there are 180 scientists and doctors who are asking the European Union to reassess the roll out because they say there is health risks.

Dr. L. Hardell professor of oncology at orebro University Sweden.
Click to expand...
The 'cell phones cause brain cancer' guy. well, as there has been no noticeable increase in the rates of brain cancer I wouldn't take anything else he says on the subject worth listening to. In fact the guy was pretty much laughed out of court with his evidence when used as an expert witness.
 
Suckmyklopp said:
Still waiting for your theory on how burning furniture melts iron and concrete. <laugh>

Lmgtfy<cheers>
Click to expand...
It doesn't mate. What it does/did do in building 7 is cause excessive expansion in the steel frame causing the floors to become unstable (very large unsupported areas). Once one floor collapsed it took others with it hence the inward collapse that looked similar to demolition.

Always happy to help :grin:
 
Last edited:
Big Ern said:
lol, I knew Pall would be on there somewhere, the guy has never done an experiment on the subject in his life and knows **** all about radiowaves.
He will however, sell you some supplements, some of which will help you with the effects of electromagnetic radiation, alledgedly.
Click to expand...

you know him well ern...guess you found stuff thats suits your views...so much slander available online2 rubbish people who seem 2 give a fk for the world we live in <laugh>
 
Diego said:
It doesn't mate. What it does/did do in building 7 is cause excessive expansion in the steel frame causing the floors to become unstable (very large unsupported areas). Once one floor collapsed it took others with it hence the inward collapse that looked similar to demolition.

Always happy to help :grin:
Click to expand...

The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.

http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7

happy to help <laugh>
 
Willhoops said:
https://www.nist.gov/topics/disaster-failure-studies/faqs-nist-wtc-7-investigation

but yeah it's more likely that the americans killed thousands of their own people in an operation that would have taken the co-operation of hundreds of people, they were all cool with that and not one person with valuable information had the slightest thought of hang on this might be a little bit wrong <doh>
Click to expand...
You forget the fact that they forgot building 7 had loads of incriminating evidence in it so had to send a team of demolition experts in (presumably whilst the twin towers were burning) to blow it up.
Nobody noticed in all the confusion <whistle>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Willhoops
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back