Oh no I understand everyone’s opinions and I didn’t say “everyone on here “ is easily led I said some, I don’t follow Boris blindly, I have criticisms, but in my opinion he is doing the best he can, following scientific advise and basing his reactions upon that, this pandemic is something only a few living souls have seen before when they were children, the governments of this world are all doing what they think is right and until the pandemic is over and the final figures so to speak are in, then and only then will we know who was right and who if any were wrong, re a post I put up earlier, many on here called Boris a bumbling fool for having a partial lockdown so the rich could remain rich at the poors expense,( again normal left wing rhetoric ). I accept that then there were others that said a lockdown was wrong we should follow Sweden and their plan, how many will now admit they got that wrong as it turns out Sweden’s infection rate is now the worst in Europe and how many will admit that going somewhere in the middle between total and no lockdown to try assist the economy was maybe a good idea, as I said we will only find out when the dust has settled.
My money, knowing the Biased Bollocks Corporation who heavily backed remain would do everything in their power to discredit The governments chief advisor on Brexit, would be on the “chose to show”, because I would find it hard to believe that every single person interviewed gave the same answer, again Beth it’s the mainstream media using their influence amongst the gullible ( not you of course ) amongst us to peddle their version of events and not necessarily the actual truth to further there own agenda of removing the man they hate for his stance on something totally different.
There are so many discrepancies in that fabricated story it's crazy. It was like something I wrote at primary school. I thought she wrote that he was bed ridden for 10 days yet he picked her and his kid up from the hospital. Considering she had symptoms, I presume she was tested at hospital.
On the first point in all honesty I don’t really have an opinion until more comes out.
I think the timeline is becoming clearer on this Bob, looking at the timeline it seems his story may be plausible regarding his wife’s episode and his, and in all honesty I think he made a serious error of judgement, albeit to protect his children, now within the guidelines it states you can leave home to care for a vulnerable relative, and as he explained he was worried about his and his wife’s ability to care for their son if both became ill again and wanted to be near his parents for their assistance because of his child’s disability / Autism.
I dont think we will ever change eithers mind on this mate. If we all left home on the basis of 'we might get ill' then the lockdown would have never existed. I've always said it was half hearted so theres a hint of hypocrisy from me here. The simplest thing would have been to try get someone to come to his house. He said he didnt want to infect anybody but was willing to drive 260 miles to infect someone, all this despite not being confirmed with covid. Surely he has access to child care in london, considering he feels incapable of looking after his own son when well. To be honest, there was never a time when one parent wasnt well enough to look after the child. It was a wasted journey really, apart from the day trip for his wife's birthday of course.
Hes definitely got something on Boris! I find it highly peculiar that all his most stringent defenders are the same ones who kicked up a fuss about being governed by unelected buerocrats
It all comes down to what's right and what's wrong. That's how actually simple this is. You either think it's right to lie your way out and fabricate stories or you think it's wrong to.
