We haven’t got the evidence mate - if we could trust any of the numbers and if the science wasn’t being all sciencey...testing hypotheses, learning from unusual and unexpected results, changing the experiments, doing different statistical analyses which give contradictory results, thinking that the experiments themselves were designed poorly and need to be done again etc etc which is all actually good science but ****ing useless when it is used to make short term policy.....we might have a better chance.
Quite, we haven't got the evidence. How do I know what to believe? My gut tells me it's mostly bollocks, but I can't say why it's so. I heard an interview on the radio the other day with someone whose name I didn't catch (a bit Ellers, this), talking about the enquiry of a few years back into our preparedness for the inevitable future pandemic - I think he called it the Cygnet enquiry (might have been 'sicknote' I suppose). His view was that if we had made preparations based on this report, none of these extreme measures would have been necessary now. The report is classified, so how can we know?
Last edited: