Suppose its horses for courses mate. My lad has absolutely excelled since being taken out of school. We have private tutors and his learning has been outstanding.
Metropolitan elite.
Suppose its horses for courses mate. My lad has absolutely excelled since being taken out of school. We have private tutors and his learning has been outstanding.
Must be different up here. My nieces are both in classes of 30, nephews the same. One whole school year was off last time they were open as the cases were in stupid numbers.
Suppose its horses for courses mate. My lad has absolutely excelled since being taken out of school. We have private tutors and his learning has been outstanding.
hes a champagne socialist plastererMetropolitan elite.

Ha ha couldnt be further from it. School isnt for everyone, it certainly wasnt for me but for different reasons to my son. An hour 1 on 1 is worth nearly a full term in a class of 30!!!Metropolitan elite.
Its certainly each to their own and we do what suits our personal circumstances. My lad was going backwards at school at quite a rapid rate. Hes gone from what was bottom set in English to the equivalent of an 'a' star in literature and language. He sees his pals (or did do) on weekends. He works with me 2 days a week for a bit of cash.Yes mate, definitely different at my kids school. A few times we had emails to say that some child in their year was positive, however our ‘bubble’ wasn’t effected....seems to work well.
Definitely different for individual kids mate....twins are really struggling with concentration and their work.....seemed to have taken a real step backwards which is gutting for me as they really were catching up.
And my daughter is doing ok at her work but struggling on not seeing her friends...I guess like a lot of 14 year old girls. However with the problems we have had in the last couple of years I don’t want her blowing up again.
Ha ha I'm just a hard grafter who doesnt mind sacrificing things in life to better my lad. Think we pay about 75 quid a week for 3 tutors so it's well worth it.hes a champagne socialist plasterer![]()
Is it the lateral flow tests that are to be carried out on secondary school children? Arent these hugely unreliable?
I'm in favour of schools going back asap, but why aren't teachers being prioritised for vaccination?
are daily saliva tests worthwhileIf you are showing symptoms you will probably get a PCR test, so on the whole most of the lateral flow tests are done either as tests of a population or in surveys...so will be in the work place, or in schools, or routine daily tests in hospital or in care home staff and residents etc...so there are a higher proportion of negatives or assymtomatic people than in people who present with Covid symptoms.
The last data I saw says the lateral flow tests are still pretty crap at picking up low positives... And still an unnerving ability to throw up random false positives in people who are actually truly negative.
Now people are getting vaccinated and having protection ...low level transmission from assymtomatic people hopefully will be handled better and fewer people should get seriously sick..
Well that's the theory....
Scientifically it should work...
So everybody gets the fundamental shift in pandemic strategy that happened yesterday? Jolly d.
So everybody gets the fundamental shift in pandemic strategy that happened yesterday? Jolly d.
Not quite. They are being very up front about it. You’ll notice no mention of R numbers. They are no longer interested in the number of infections, having admitted that the virus will always be with us, the emphasis is solely on the vaccines to manage serious disease. The ‘tests’-'Data not dates', isn't it?
Couldn't help noticing a lot of dates and not much data, though.
Not quite. They are being very up front about it. You’ll notice no mention of R numbers. They are no longer interested in the number of infections, having admitted that the virus will always be with us, the emphasis is solely on the vaccines to manage serious disease. The ‘tests’-
1. The vaccine deployment programme continues successfully.
2. Evidence shows vaccines are sufficiently effective in reducing hospitalisations and deaths in those vaccinated.
3. Infection rates do not risk a surge in hospitalisations which would put unsustainable pressure on the NHS.
4. Our assessment of the risks is not fundamentally changed by new "variants of concern".
Do not have my metrics/numbers attached to them, at least not for public consumption. How do we measure ‘unsustainable pressure’ on the NHS and surely we don’t wait until this is happening before acting?
Not saying this change in tack is wrong (how would I know, don’t have any access to data.......) but it is quite a dramatic change. What doesn’t fit in with it is the testing surge, if we know people are going to be infected, and we expect these infections to be mild because of the impact of vaccines, but we only care about hospitalisations and deaths, why test? Hospitalisations have always been the most accurate measure of this pandemic.