Contract Lengths

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Darth Gogledd

Darth Gogledd

Well-Known Member
Feb 7, 2011
4,465
374
83
Gogledd Cymru - North Wales
As the title says really. All our new signings have been given mega-long contracts.

Is this due to the Enrique situation? It seems that ever since he left, every contract given has been 4 years or more, up to 6 1/2 years for Sissoko.

To me it seems like the board must have great faith in the scouting system that these guys are worth it, cos to pay a flop for nearly 7 years is a very costly mistake (Xisco...). Either that or they are just so paranoid about losing players for less than they're worth that they're prepared to take that risk...
 
It means we can enjoy them for a few seasons and still have time to sell them rather than lose them for nowt.
 
Boa said:
It means we can enjoy them for a few seasons and still have time to sell them rather than lose them for nowt.
Click to expand...

Agree! It ties in with the philosophy Mike set out to buy relatively young / cheap where possible and sell on for a profit. At least this way with long contracts we might see them for a few good seasons, OR get decent money to buy them out of the current contract. Seems good to me.
 
Mrs Obi has just confirmed it. I asked her whether short or long is best and she said definitely longer. She said she wished mine were longer, so I'm going to ask my boss for an extension tomorrow.
 
If you look at the contract length of each player, each one takes the individual player to around 28. This means if the player isn't sold for mega bucks we have still had the best years out of the said player. Smart business plan.

Basically means we don't get stuck like Arsenal did with Nasri and Fabregas.
 
The vast majority of our recent signings have sound pedigree's and were'nt picked via video. They are internationals already with long careers ahead so I for one say Ashley is sound in tying them down so we don't get another Demba Ba situation.
If we were to transfer them tomorrow do you think Sissoko's value would be £2 million or Mbiwa £6.7 million, I think not so it's a win, win situation for me.
 
I think part of the reason of these long contracts is this. Since our scouting has paid off as shown, if we are in for the players and believe them to be suitable for us, why hold back on offering long deals? If we already think they'll be critical to our success in the long run, might as well tie them down to long deals. The risk is of course a Xisco or a Luque or Winston Bogarde situation or Marcelino happening. However if they feel they've thoroughly scouted the player and think they won't do a Marcelino on us, then there really is no harm getting a long deal on them.
 
It's just smart risk sharing. NUFC is bringing in talent from non-EPL sides. Now they can either go on to be awesome and prosper - in which case NUFC can cash in/keep them - or they go anonymous and are all rubbish. It's a gamble basically. So what, at least in my opinion, the club is doing, is offering them a guarantee on the back end - which given our wage structure is not all that big - in return for a long contract which gives us the ability to cash in if they get all Demba Ba awesome. And of course, there's the added aspect that the we (our club) no doubt think our scouting gives the edge.

It's just basically applying at little bit of finance brain to the transfer situation.

Point being that there is no inherent downside to a small transfer fee, small wage, long contract. You are just pushing the variables around a bit to fit to a new model.
 
He has to back his scouting system. If they do well, which is what he will expect, then clubs are deterred from just waiting out the contract. They have to pay top dollar. Obviously the risk comes from them not doing the business but I can't see the likes of Debuchy, Sissoko, Mbiwa failing to justify the outlay given their pedigree. Haidara and Gouffran are low level risks with the fees involved.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back