Off Topic Conspiracy Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
terrifictraore said:
Lol you really are a funny one, attacking other peoples knowledge whilst writing gibberish yourself, did you actually read back that first line before you posted it.

Despite you still not telling me what alternative narrative you believe I have swallowed whole, your view of alternative/ counter narratives is clearly obvious and is as scary as it is hilarious. However, that statement does substantiate a post I made over a week ago where i said this to you "you have been told what to think and seem determined to stick to it".
Click to expand...

You think someone finding ludicrous alternative/counter narratives scary? Bless. I base my observations on what I have read or seen not some alternative/counter narratives from swivel-eyed loons sitting in a bed sit posting on the internet. They have told you what to think and you seem determined to stick to it. Now, that is scary.

I do find it hilarious that someone who uses phrases like alternative/counter narratives is so inept at punctuation.
 
Castro's Coffin said:
You think someone finding ludicrous alternative/counter narratives scary? Bless. I base my observations on what I have read or seen not some alternative/counter narratives from swivel-eyed loons sitting in a bed sit posting on the internet. They have told you what to think and you seem determined to stick to it. Now, that is scary.

I do find it hilarious that someone who uses phrases like alternative/counter narratives is so inept at punctuation.
Click to expand...

Yet more defensive avoidance of the question. Anyway, despite your refusal to accept at face value anything that you feel is an alternative/counter narrative, you still claimed that I had swallowed one whole, can you please tell me what that is?
 
Castro's Coffin said:
He was, as I told someone after becoming fed up on being asked a dozen how many units I consumed whilst in hospital due to something that had no connection to drinking, a teetotal, non-smoking, vegetarian who was a complete wreck at 56 whilst Churchill, who drank like a fish, smoked and ate all the "wrong" goods went on to 90.
Click to expand...

TBF though Hitler wasn't a saint. There's strong evidence to show he was doing more Coke and Opiates than Keith Richards and Tyson Fury out on a bender.
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
I watched the Dan Snow documentary on Nazi gold. It was checking a claim that there was a train load of gold buried in Austria. The specific claim seems to be false, but there's good evidence to suggest that the US stole many millions of dollars worth of stolen gold, and that more still is unaccounted for.
Click to expand...

Just think of that as a small clearing fee for the $12 Billion they gave to Europe between '48 and '52 as part of the Marshall plan. To be fair to the Americans (and in direct contrast to Afghanistan and Iraq) they put their money where their mouth was getting Europe and Japan back on their feet after the war rather than leaving them to stew and consider another one....
 
I get the feeling you could show somebody a video or photo of an actual alien and they would still call bullshit. A concept so unbelievable that it can't possibly be true and therefore, in the eyes of that person, isn't. Plus not to mention the ridicule they would get for admitting thinking it was real, despite people being unable to offer a legitimate counter claim.
So, even When somebody presents legitimate evidence and even if NASA one day swung round and told us they were real, nobody would actually believe them. It's genius.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Building 7, Diego and look_back_in_amber
Castro's Coffin said:
Who said EVERYONE knew?

Auschwitz/Birkenau was only operating as an extermination centre for three years. Over a million died there. You work out how many they had to deal with on a daily basis. Though in the end they couldn't cope and resorted to enormous pyres.

Suggest you read a hit on the subject instead of looking at alternative narratives and swallowing them whole.

You would have thought access to information through the internet would have made people more aware of things, not less.
Click to expand...

The Auschwitz resident history professor states that the Auschwitz 'gas chamber' was constructed by the Soviets, AFTER the end of the war.
There was NO gas chamber.

So a million corpses were burned on funeral pyres. What happened to their bones, why are they unaccounted for?

The official total of deaths at Auschwitz is 1.5 million, a 2.5 million reduction of the figure released in 1948. Why hasn't the official total figure been revised from 6 million? Why are our children still force fed this bullshit figure?
Anyone would think that 6 million is somehow important to Jews. (See below)

The Germans kept a record of deaths themselves.
The Auschwitz death books give a total figure of 61,000, 30,000 of which were Jews.
The official figure given by the red cross, who were left free to roam anywhere they pleased inside Auschwitz is 135,000.

I know who I believe and it isn't the bankers or politicians..

You must log in or register to see images
 
Stockholm Tiger said:
Just think of that as a small clearing fee for the $12 Billion they gave to Europe between '48 and '52 as part of the Marshall plan. To be fair to the Americans (and in direct contrast to Afghanistan and Iraq) they put their money where their mouth was getting Europe and Japan back on their feet after the war rather than leaving them to stew and consider another one....
Click to expand...

It was a loan that was paid back in full, every last bullet.
 
Sterling Archer said:
I get the feeling you could show somebody a video or photo of an actual alien and they would still call bullshit. A concept so unbelievable that it can't possibly be true and therefore, in the eyes of that person, isn't. Plus not to mention the ridicule they would get for admitting thinking it was real, despite people being unable to offer a legitimate counter claim.
So, even When somebody presents legitimate evidence and even if NASA one day swung round and told us they were real, nobody would actually believe them. It's genius.
Click to expand...

Good point tbf and it made me wonder what I would need to see to believe it without assuming it had been faked. We are back to cognitive dissonance, none of us like to hear information that does not fit in with our belief structure, for some that dissonance is too great and they will go to great lengths to manipulate their own thinking in order avoid having to accept the new information.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Building 7
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back