You think someone finding ludicrous alternative/counter narratives scary? Bless. I base my observations on what I have read or seen not some alternative/counter narratives from swivel-eyed loons sitting in a bed sit posting on the internet. They have told you what to think and you seem determined to stick to it. Now, that is scary. I do find it hilarious that someone who uses phrases like alternative/counter narratives is so inept at punctuation.
Yet more defensive avoidance of the question. Anyway, despite your refusal to accept at face value anything that you feel is an alternative/counter narrative, you still claimed that I had swallowed one whole, can you please tell me what that is?
They had some self defence advice from martial arts expert. They reckon if you're attacked by a gang of clowns, always go for the juggler.
If their cars are that ****, maybe that's what they are so angry about, looking for the dodgy second hand dealer who ripped them off.
The Germans on the 1st of September 1939 then Russians on the 16th. She was double teamed. Think of it like a surprise spit roast.
TBF though Hitler wasn't a saint. There's strong evidence to show he was doing more Coke and Opiates than Keith Richards and Tyson Fury out on a bender.
Just think of that as a small clearing fee for the $12 Billion they gave to Europe between '48 and '52 as part of the Marshall plan. To be fair to the Americans (and in direct contrast to Afghanistan and Iraq) they put their money where their mouth was getting Europe and Japan back on their feet after the war rather than leaving them to stew and consider another one....
I get the feeling you could show somebody a video or photo of an actual alien and they would still call bullshit. A concept so unbelievable that it can't possibly be true and therefore, in the eyes of that person, isn't. Plus not to mention the ridicule they would get for admitting thinking it was real, despite people being unable to offer a legitimate counter claim. So, even When somebody presents legitimate evidence and even if NASA one day swung round and told us they were real, nobody would actually believe them. It's genius.
The Auschwitz resident history professor states that the Auschwitz 'gas chamber' was constructed by the Soviets, AFTER the end of the war. There was NO gas chamber. So a million corpses were burned on funeral pyres. What happened to their bones, why are they unaccounted for? The official total of deaths at Auschwitz is 1.5 million, a 2.5 million reduction of the figure released in 1948. Why hasn't the official total figure been revised from 6 million? Why are our children still force fed this bullshit figure? Anyone would think that 6 million is somehow important to Jews. (See below) The Germans kept a record of deaths themselves. The Auschwitz death books give a total figure of 61,000, 30,000 of which were Jews. The official figure given by the red cross, who were left free to roam anywhere they pleased inside Auschwitz is 135,000. I know who I believe and it isn't the bankers or politicians..
Good point tbf and it made me wonder what I would need to see to believe it without assuming it had been faked. We are back to cognitive dissonance, none of us like to hear information that does not fit in with our belief structure, for some that dissonance is too great and they will go to great lengths to manipulate their own thinking in order avoid having to accept the new information.
