Off Topic Conspiracy Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The missile painted in American Airline colours which they show a few times looks more like a drone than a cruise missile. News footage of the impact shows a ball of flames, can or do cruise missiles carry incendiary devices? They never actually show the impact of the missile in this film. In the picture of the hole in the wall i'm not sure it is the pentagon building, it's similar but the window levels look different and I can't imagine a no parking in this area sign been needed up against the pentagon wall.


I'm not to sure about the video images, but it's good to hear Stephen Hawkings daughter's finding work. <ok>
 
I've not heard about the claim of cars bursting into flames. Do you have any decent links to more on that?

On the video, that spike thing just seems to wobble and fall in a mist of dust and poor image resolution. Is the Dr claiming it shows it being vapourised?
The thing about the cars is that she seems to be claiming they didn't 'catch fire' in the normal sense. Her reasoning ; there is paper, trees , shop fronts etc that are in close proximity to the cars that are unaffected. Also it's either the front or the back of the car that has been affected and the other half remain relatively unscathed implying that where there is an electrical insulator or a gap in the body work doors to front wings etc the circuit is broken and hence the damage stops abruptly. I'm not saying I'm convinced only that it is a very strange phenomenom. Some of her interviews are a bit amateurish but putting that aside one point stands out, the nearby street lights , traffic lights and shop fronts are earthed but cars on rubber tyres aren't. I'll have a look for a vid.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to see media
I've not heard about the claim of cars bursting into flames. Do you have any decent links to more on that?

On the video, that spike thing just seems to wobble and fall in a mist of dust and poor image resolution. Is the Dr claiming it shows it being vapourised?
The cars bit is 57 mins in
 
Have we done the one about the CIA creating AIDS to kill off the blacks and gays yet? :emoticon-0112-wonde

The point that raises though, is do the CIA generate fake conspiracy theories, so that real conspiracies get dismissed and ridiculed?

There is no doubt at all that groups like the CIA have conspired with various 'enemies' for different reasons such as in South America, Afghanistan and Sicily, and their black ops budget is bigger than the budget of many nations.

Are people ridiculing conspiracies, victims of a conspiracy?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Building 7
Hillary is severely ill , her face is bloated (as if she has been prescribed steriods). It's a lot more than pneumonia. If it was just pneumonia her team have had plenty of opportunity to come out and say so in the preceding weeks.
 
The point that raises though, is do the CIA generate fake conspiracy theories, so that real conspiracies get dismissed and ridiculed?

There is no doubt at all that groups like the CIA have conspired with various 'enemies' for different reasons such as in South America, Afghanistan and Sicily, and their black ops budget is bigger than the budget of many nations.

Are people ridiculing conspiracies, victims of a conspiracy?

Some conspiracies are obviously genuine, things have been covered up over the years, so I don't think they need to fake them. Particularly when they've got people like Dr Judy to do it for them.

The CIA being responsible for AIDS isn't even the most ridiculous theory posted on this thread.
 
i visited ground zero and I went into the memorial building! There's massive steel structures and the one thing that struck me was how could a plane have brought this down? Ok maybe & it's a big maybe? If the planes had struck the bottom of the buildings it could have toppled them? But for them to hit above half way and for them to implode like they did???
 
i visited ground zero and I went into the memorial building! There's massive steel structures and the one thing that struck me was how could a plane have brought this down? Ok maybe & it's a big maybe? If the planes had struck the bottom of the buildings it could have toppled them? But for them to hit above half way and for them to implode like they did???

Your "Wow its big" is clear proof that it was all faked.
 
Deary me.
Propaganda, information control, disinformation and lying are admitted tactics of governments the world over. I have seen instances where lies are required to protect sources, people, or ongoing investigations.

9/11 was a genuine attack.

The conspiracy evidence is fuelled by non important academics who want a minute of fame and who write incompetent papers with illogical conclusions. And school kids who get sucked into the mystery and half truths.
If we wanted an excuse to invade anywhere, any government could do it without resorting to extreme loss of life and a world changing terrorist victory event.

Some dodgy Info is usually enough.

The real lies are so well hidden you don't see them. This one isn't a lie!


EDIT: missile hitting the pentagon? If there was a contingency for what to do in a breach, where sensitive equipment or papers may be open to professional "looters", maybe a self initiated destruction maybe an option, like a burn after reading.
The catalyst would always be an attack. You don't shoot your own Intel HQ. FFS. Seriously. The thing was annihilated by a loon in a plane. End of.
 
Last edited:
Can we start a new conspiracy on here. The guy who attempted to assassinate Ronald Reagan has just been released from prison into the care of his mother (she must be near 100 years old) Is he going to do for one of the candidates?
 
i visited ground zero and I went into the memorial building! There's massive steel structures and the one thing that struck me was how could a plane have brought this down? Ok maybe & it's a big maybe? If the planes had struck the bottom of the buildings it could have toppled them? But for them to hit above half way and for them to implode like they did???

Bin Laden said his knowledge of structures due to his background of being an architect and his families engineering firm made him realise the Twin Towers could be made to collapse.
Of course he may have been part of the conspiracy with the CIA, and no doubt Israel Which was the reason they rubbed him out -to protect the secret. On the other hand,planes were flown into the Twin Towers and they collapsed.