Off Topic Climate Change
- Thread starter Looney Leftie
- Start date
- Status
The daft thing is, you're accused of being a climate change denier, when your argument routinely shows the climate changing overtime. It confuses the **** out of them, because they seem to get their 'knowledge' from news articles, and don't bother looking deeper.
My own position is that too much time is wasted on the 'blame' and that draws resources away from more practical ways forward. We need a radical change in lifestyles to one that doesn't abuse natural resources and tries to future proof against the changes that will come.
Indeed. and I am all for cleaner energy, and a cleaner environment. Conservation is also good and I've being doing that for along time. I am called a denier by a chippy, who's whole existence is owed to petrochemicals and the pollution from chippes is actually real biological aerosol pollution plus.. this cretin never ever did anything for environment, same for the others. I've "chipped in" at least
Irony.
It's demonstrable that there would not be maybe 1 to 2 billion people alive today, where it not for the CO2 increases.
Historical data shows we are OK up to around 1500ppm. The world thrived at those levels though a caveat is, O2 levels were far higher in those times too, so it's not as simple as it seems
Historical data shows we are OK up to around 1500ppm. The world thrived at those levels though a caveat is, O2 levels were far higher in those times too, so it's not as simple as it seems
Indeed. and I am all for cleaner energy, and a cleaner environment. Conservation is also good and I've being doing that for along time. I am called a denier by a chippy, who's whole existence is owed to petrochemicals and the pollution from chippes is actually real biological aerosol pollution plus.. this cretin never ever did anything for environment, same for the others. I've "chipped in" at least
Irony.
Quite a few are clearly governed by material possessions, believing they demonstrate their status, and are terrified of anything that affects that, and leaves their status being determined by their actions alone. It's why they tend to react emotionally rather than rationally, and judge things by financial standards alone.
It’s bloody hilarious isn’t it. A real bromance brewing. It must be right about opposite attracting as you have someone who has been proven time and time again, to be clueless and someone who believes he’s a genius.
My work here is done
I think the two posts above this are examples of what a lack of oxygen can result in.
Here is what is claimed by academics, and CO2 is blamed, off the top of my head like
Dogs are getting depressed
The oceans are turning acidic
The ocean floor is dissolving
Droughts are worsening
Floods are worsening
Hurricanes are worsening
Chocolate will disappear
Snow will disappear
Cities will be swamped
Islands will disappear
The arctic will be ice free
Antarctica will melt flooding the world
Air flights will see super turbulence
the planet will slow its rotation
Earth will reach a tipping point and turn into Venus
Crime will increase
Rape will increase
people will be shorter
No more beer
No more wine
I could go on and I can post papers that claim these things all based on our 1 in 10000 molecules added to the atmosphere. CO2 is 0.04% ( and our addition is 3% to 5% of yearly emissions, the rest is nature) of the atmosphere
This is nothing short of witchcraft to say that molecule can do all of that
Dogs are getting depressed
The oceans are turning acidic
The ocean floor is dissolving
Droughts are worsening
Floods are worsening
Hurricanes are worsening
Chocolate will disappear
Snow will disappear
Cities will be swamped
Islands will disappear
The arctic will be ice free
Antarctica will melt flooding the world
Air flights will see super turbulence
the planet will slow its rotation
Earth will reach a tipping point and turn into Venus
Crime will increase
Rape will increase
people will be shorter
No more beer
No more wine
I could go on and I can post papers that claim these things all based on our 1 in 10000 molecules added to the atmosphere. CO2 is 0.04% ( and our addition is 3% to 5% of yearly emissions, the rest is nature) of the atmosphere
This is nothing short of witchcraft to say that molecule can do all of that
This will now descend into a demand for evidence, then criticism of the sources, with no real conversation on the actual issue.
I’ve not been here for 2 hours and you’re still obsessing about me and passing off your clueless ‘analysis’ as being fact.
Not that you’re bothered or anything.
I’ll follow you, crack on. Of course you can’t because the above nonsense is all your capable of. Your only contribution ever is to tell someone else they don’t contribute.
By the way, I’ve never said whether I agree or disagree with Sisu on this subject. All I’ve ever said is that I won’t enter into the debate.
My fruit loop comments are directed towards his posting style and the funny tantrums he seems to have.
This will now descend into a demand for evidence, then criticism of the sources, with no real conversation on the actual issue.
I can post a paper for each of those claims so no worries. There are more that I have left out, thousands more!!! 20 years of funding anything that blames CO2 has generated thousands of junk papers
I haven't mentioned you in quite a while. before dinner like
You talk about me more than you talk to me.
It's the opposite with me
Stop waffling and prevaricating. Show us what you've got lad, argue against his claims.
- Status