Off Topic Climate Change

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's why they try to had behind these piss poor personal assessments, they just can't abide being shown to be limited. When it happens, rather than taking on board the new information, the bristle and accuse people of thinking they're intellectually superior, but don't accept their own claims to being right are simply the other side of that coin, albeit lacking substance.


I've been on here since 2011, and have never ever read Tobes say he was wrong.

That's a mental disorder I suspect
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
He doesn't, he tries like hell to reinvent the question or change the subject.

Bang on the money. I've tried many times go get a binary answer from him, and he sees where the answer leads and refuses to answer.

he's a typical beta male, never mind being afraid of other males, he's afraid of his own fragile ego taking a hit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego and DMD
You can spot fragile types a mile away, when you argue with them they bring up everything you ever said or did in the past in rebuttal to a current non related debate.


So many women I have argued with, roll that way too. [HASHTAG]#BetaMale[/HASHTAG] [HASHTAG]#Soyboy[/HASHTAG]
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
You can spot fragile types a mile away, when you argue with them they bring up everything you ever said or did in the past in rebuttal to a current non related debate.


So many women I have argued with, roll that way too. [HASHTAG]#BetaMale[/HASHTAG] [HASHTAG]#Soyboy[/HASHTAG]

Why do you argue with so many women?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JakartaToon
You can spot fragile types a mile away, when you argue with them they bring up everything you ever said or did in the past in rebuttal to a current non related debate.


So many women I have argued with, roll that way too. [HASHTAG]#BetaMale[/HASHTAG] [HASHTAG]#Soyboy[/HASHTAG]

When they do try to bring up previous issues, it's almost always with some bizarre contextual twist.
 
When they do try to bring up previous issues, it's almost always with some bizarre contextual twist.

Context is their enemy. They have to take things out of context to make an argument all too often.

Or they are so ****in stupid, they lose the context of the argument after 4 posts
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
Is it made from CO2?

If not, I'm not interested.

You exhale 40.000 parts per million CO2, 100 times the atmospheric level you gobshite

That feeling you get when you hold your breath, it's not lack of O2, it's excess CO2 your body wants to expel through your lungs
 
Context is their enemy. They have to take things out of context to make an argument all too often.

Or they are so ****in stupid, they lose the context of the argument after 4 posts

When all else fails, they try to recycle their previously failed myths.
 
You exhale 40.000 parts per million CO2, 100 times the atmospheric level you gobshite

That feeling you get when you hold your breath, it's not lack of O2, it's excess CO2

Oh, you think I'm being serious?

Bless.
 
It's why they try to had behind these piss poor personal assessments, they just can't abide being shown to be limited. When it happens, rather than taking on board the new information, the bristle and accuse people of thinking they're intellectually superior, but don't accept their own claims to being right are simply the other side of that coin, albeit lacking substance.

You've never, for the best part of three years that the politics threads have been in existence, been able to debate any subject beyond a headline and yet your standard default position is that everyone else is limited.
In fact, what you have posted above is your standard MO when your lack of knowledge is frequently exposed. You are the master of deflection, which is used to cover up your own inadequacies and lack of intelligence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes and NSIS
You must log in or register to see images


Human emissions started to really increase after WWII, along with better practices, CO2.. a clear and obvious benefit, weighed against claims of doom with ZERO evidence to support them

US
You must log in or register to see images
 
You've never, for the best part of three years that the politics threads have been in existence, been able to debate any subject beyond a headline and yet your standard default position is that everyone else is limited.
In fact, what you have posted above is your standard MO when your lack of knowledge is frequently exposed. You are the master of deflection, which is used to cover up your own inadequacies and lack of intelligence.


@PhheHdee ^^^^ See > "When all else fails, they try to recycle their previously failed myths."

It's because he simply can't have a grown up, fact base discussion. He has to fall back on bullshit and lies.

Stop deflecting pieguts. Stop your blubbing, show us what you've got and have a go at proving him wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Angry_Physics
Status
Not open for further replies.