Spurs are interested....
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/2004...dium=sharebar_native&utm_campaign=sharebaramp
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/2004...dium=sharebar_native&utm_campaign=sharebaramp
Spurs are interested....
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/2004...dium=sharebar_native&utm_campaign=sharebaramp
I'm pretty sure he'll have the common sense to realise taking a step forward and then 2 back would be a bad move in his career.
Djed Spence was the best right back in the Championship last season and he decided to go to Spurs.
Hes yet to play a single minute in the Premier league this season.
Realistically though, how far away is he from that Spurs team?
I'm not saying they couldn't buy better, but as a lcb, he would probably be back up to Ben Davies (and his long-term successor). He'd add to the home grown numbers and with Spurs in Europe as well, he could easily find himself playing games for them.
Failing that, they could easily move him on to a mid-table Premier League club where he'd be able to compete for games and quadruple his earnings at the same time.
I'd be a bit worried about this, on the basis that he's already worth the buy-back fee and he's only 20 with an incredibly high ceiling. He's a bargain at £6m.
I'm pretty sure he'll have the common sense to realise taking a step forward and then 2 back would be a bad move in his career.
Djed Spence was the best right back in the Championship last season and he decided to go to Spurs.
Hes yet to play a single minute in the Premier league this season.
But he will have trebled his salary, and his agent will have pocketed a nice earner too.
That's what turns the murky wheels of football, though I agree with you completely about him being best staying here.
Good business decision on their part if it happened, Just might make Sunderland think twice about these sort of clauses in a transfers in the future, but it seems to be our "model" so I guess not
So why would they sell him and try and sign him back less than a year later? Their reason for letting him go will still stand at this moment in time, aswell as the same reason he decided a move would be best for his career.
I'm sure Spence wouldn't have signed for them if he knew how things would pan out.
Good business decision on their part if it happened, Just might make Sunderland think twice about these sort of clauses in a transfers in the future, but it seems to be our "model" so I guess not
It's not less than a year later, it's more than a year later but that's incidental.
The old cliché goes that "a week is a long time in football". Well 14th months is an eternity. In that time Cirkin has got 50 games under his belt and developed better than anyone could have hoped - this scenario is the reason they have the buyback clause in place.
I'm not saying he will leave, I'm not saying he's even interested, but top footballers back themselves and he will have complete belief that he can play at the very top. A big part of the reasons he left were personal and if that reason has calmed down somewhat, a return might not be something he's opposed to. It all depends how highly he backs himself and what his primary motivators are.
My bad, 14 months later then, (time flys).
He's a young lad playing in the Championship, I'm sure he has the common sense to realise like Djed Spence, sitting on the bench at a top 6 Premiership club is not the way forward. That was the reason he left them in the first place. I'm sure after 14 months he feels no different
I understand exactly what you're saying mate and hopefully you're right. But I doubt he looks at other players and thinks he'll be on the bench. He's more likely to look at Ryan Sessegnon getting opportunities and think "I'm better than him, I could be playing at that level." Footballers back themselves.
It's impossible to know someone's motivation, but it appeared to me from what I've read that Cirkin's dad dying in January of last year was a key reason for him wanting to get away from the area. But people process grief in time and there could be personal reasons for wanting to go back. It's not an obvious decision and that's before you factor in the life changing amounts of money.
OR making a £5m profit in a year is good business by usGood business decision on their part if it happened, Just might make Sunderland think twice about these sort of clauses in a transfers in the future, but it seems to be our "model" so I guess not
Regardless of whatever clause was negotiated wouldn't Cirkin have to agree to move ?
Surely if we want to keep him it's up to us to show the player the opportunities here and if he's good enough he could take a move later that could put him straight into the first team of whatever club he joins.
However as others have said it'll probably all come down to money