Yes I said that. The reference to "if only it was genuine" is clearly a reference to Bruce lying, not me. His position wasn't genuine when he said 17th as he only said that when we clearly weren't going to match his previously stated aim of 10th or higher.
Haha you meant something different? I don't believe that and. ?? It doesn't matter what Bruce's aims were his aim was 17th and you admitted that
So we now enter the well known Chaos route of ignoring the full picture, ignoring what the other person actually posts and claiming to be victor. Which part of Bruce moving the goalposts to suit his failure are you finding it difficult to understand?. So given that you are now deflecting away from my question which you have painfully failed to answer you obviously know the score and I'll leave you to WUM on by yourself.
You're supposed to say: "I've told you once" Then I reply: "No you havent" And that sets up a proper argument. But you've just gone and killed it.
Your 1st post yesterday 1.a fallacious argument because I never said anything of the sort. 2. Where did I say he did a good job? The word **** isn't to your understanding I assume? 3. I was right you've since tried to bring in several secondary arguments including Bruce's personal goal which isn't the same as the clubs which you admitted was 17th, so you knew the aim was 17th and he came 12th.. Thats doing a job and you know it.
I don't need to convince anyone you said you knew the aim was 17th then you backtracked and started bringing up secondary arguments as I said you would to GG. GG is just saying the same thing and fair play to him. He doesn't let his personal gripe interfere with matter of fact. Now either discuss the point or don't say anything at all folders... No need to keep up your casual insults that's a sure sign of defeat in any debate.. Another fact for you Is there any part of this post below you don't understand?
Tbf Munson is just doing his Munson thing. Post the same thing again and again like a maniac even if it stops making sense about 17 posts ago. GG goes into cheerleader mode on occasion, he tries to follow whoever he thinks is the biggest in the room.
So as predicted and explained last night in the post below you moved the area of debate and now suggest I'm the one deflecting your secondary argument which as I stated was never the point of discussion or even in dispute. Thankyou for confirming I was right
I don't particularly care what makes sense to people that aren't the person that made a fallacious claim. I've shown in black and white exactly what my point was and what folders would do in response rather than concede. The reason I keep posting the same thing is because I won't shift from my point into secondary areas like he needs me to.