Celtic & Rangers?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
There are no Englishmen on this thread who support 'diddy' teams.

How the **** can you accuse us of supporting diddy teams when you support albion rovers anyways?
 
I am confident that Sunderland could beat Celtic or Rangers. We don't have a chance of making it into the Europa league, so I think it's disgraceful that Celtic and Rangers get in automatically, just because they are the least **** clubs in Scotland.
 
Celtic and Rangers don't just get into Europe because they are the least **** in Scotland. There is such a thing called the coefficient which is based on performances in Europe, of course it is mostly Celtic and Rangers that have built up Scotland's coefficient but this is what allows us places in Europe

You fans of the diddy teams in England need not worry about your coefficient as you lot get in on the coatails of the likes of Man Utd and Chelsea who only do well in Europe due to spending millions of pounds. Next season you have Birmingham and Stoke in Europe, that'll be riveting stuff I'm sure
 
If you believe that I support Albion Rovers then you'll believe anything

I bet you're the sort of guy that when you were a kid got sent to the shop for tartan paint, left handed screwdrivers and a long stand
 
It's the internet, things aren't always as they seem

If I put on my profile that I was a millionaire and an international playboy would you believe it?
 
UserName1882 said:
If you believe that I support Albion Rovers then you'll believe anything

I bet you're the sort of guy that when you were a kid got sent to the shop for tartan paint, left handed screwdrivers and a long stand
Click to expand...

About Me

Basic Information

Extra Info

Team you support?
Albion Rovers

Then I click on your recent posts and see this: http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/52148-Best-Scottish-teams-outside-the-SPL?p=526242#post526242

So yeah I'm a right gullible twat, it's not like any of that looks like you're being serious.
 
jerseymackem said:
I am confident that Sunderland could beat Celtic or Rangers. We don't have a chance of making it into the Europa league, so I think it's disgraceful that Celtic and Rangers get in automatically, just because they are the least **** clubs in Scotland.
Click to expand...

**** off Sunderland, we get 54,000 season ticket holders and we've actually won the European cup. You get my Sky tv subscription money handed to you on a big platter every year while I've to pay the same to watch **** games at Inverness, we deserve European football much more than provincial teams in the rich leagues.
 
MalteseMick said:
**** off Sunderland, we get 54,000 season ticket holders and we've actually won the European cup. You get my Sky tv subscription money handed to you on a big platter every year while I've to pay to watch **** games at Inverness, we deserve European football much more than provincial teams in the rich leagues.
Click to expand...

You get 54,000 simply because you're the only realistic option out of 2 football teams in your entire country. We regularly get about 40,000 despite being next to Newcastle, who are historically more successful. We don't get very much money at all from Sky, and I have to pay to watch ****ty Scottish football waiting for the 4-5 times a year Sunderland are on the TV, because the airtime is being taken up by the top 4.
 
The airtime is being taken up by the top 4 because that's the only teams people want to see. Nobody cares about Bolton or Sunderland or Stoke or any of the other teams

Like I said on a previous post, the rest of the Premier League are being dragged around on the coat tails of Man Utd, Chelsea, Arsenal and maybe Liverpool. Put it this way, the top 4 are like rich businessmen who fancy a night away from the wife and the other 16 are like prostitutes who only get to experience all the riches and all the benefits due to it being paid for them by the big boys
 
jerseymackem said:
You get 54,000 simply because you're the only realistic option out of 2 football teams in your entire country. We regularly get about 40,000 despite being next to Newcastle, who are historically more successful. We don't get very much money at all from Sky, and I have to pay to watch ****ty Scottish football waiting for the 4-5 times a year Sunderland are on the TV, because the airtime is being taken up by the top 4.
Click to expand...

aye but you still get like 40m a year tv rights even if you don't get to see yourself on TV that often - the whole SPL is getting 50m in five seasons, thats about £2.5m a year to Celtic despite them being one of the best supported clubs in the country and on tv every week. You also understand that basically you are saying that because you are in the Premier League and can pay higher wages than us for better players than you deserve Europe more than us - despite the fact historically Celtic and Rangers have been bigger, more successful European clubs than even the likes of Chelsea.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back