Cash In

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
originallambrettaman said:
Rumours are that wolfman88 won't be around much longer if he continues to clutter up the board with utter ****e, 161 posts so far and he's yet to post one that was worth reading.
Click to expand...

Rumors are that this is a biased Ctwd forum run by Ctwd sympathizers and the said sympathizers will ban anyone who dares speak up against Ctwd.
What happened to democracy and free speech I and my father before me fought for ?
Users on here shout about freedom of speech when it suits them but once again OLM and co show how biased they really are.
 
jjon said:
Rumors are that this is a biased Ctwd forum run by Ctwd sympathizers and the said sympathizers will ban anyone who dares speak up against Ctwd.
What happened to democracy and free speech I and my father before me fought for ?
Users on here shout about freedom of speech when it suits them but once again OLM and co show how biased they really are.
Click to expand...

Really? Care to be more specific.
 
jjon said:
originallambrettaman said:
Rumours are that wolfman88 won't be around much longer if he continues to clutter up the board with utter ****e, 161 posts so far and he's yet to post one that was worth reading.
Click to expand...

Rumors are that this is a biased Ctwd forum run by Ctwd sympathizers and the said sympathizers will ban anyone who dares speak up against Ctwd.
What happened to democracy and free speech I and my father before me fought for ?
Users on here shout about freedom of speech when it suits them but once again OLM and co show how biased they really are.
Click to expand...

Rumours, rumours, rumours. Rumour is you can't spell rumour.

It's a Hull City forum.
 
jjon said:
Rumors are that this is a biased Ctwd forum run by Ctwd sympathizers and the said sympathizers will ban anyone who dares speak up against Ctwd.
What happened to democracy and free speech I and my father before me fought for ?
Users on here shout about freedom of speech when it suits them but once again OLM and co show how biased they really are.
Click to expand...

Nobody has ever been banned from this board for being anti-CTWD, no post has ever been deleted just because it was anti-CTWD, everyone is entitled to their opinion and is free to post it on here, so your assertion is nonsense.

The fact is, that our friend wolfman88 just spams the board with ****e, he irritates our other posters(several of whom have put in ban requests), yet we're still allowing him to post.
 
Newland Tiger said:
Far too lenient on here just ban people like wolfman88 he clearly doesn't add anything useful to the forum
Click to expand...

Neither does a comment like ban wolfman for having an opinion, whether you agree with him or not is irrelevant.
This site has a ignore function, why not use it instead of trying to get someone banned just because you don't agree with him?
 
jjon said:
Neither does a comment like ban wolfman for having an opinion, whether you agree with him or not is irrelevant.
This site has a ignore function, why not use it instead of trying to get someone banned just because you don't agree with him?
Click to expand...

well said
 
jjon said:
Neither does a comment like ban wolfman for having an opinion, whether you agree with him or not is irrelevant.
This site has a ignore function, why not use it instead of trying to get someone banned just because you don't agree with him?
Click to expand...

We can't ban someone simply because we don't agree with them and as I've already stated(and you've conveniently ignored), nobody has ever been banned for being anti-CTWD, or for simply having a different opinion to anyone else. To get banned, you need to consistently disrupt threads by posting pointless nonsense, contributing nothing constructive and irritating a large amount of other users.
 
jjon said:
Rumors are that this is a biased Ctwd forum run by Ctwd sympathizers and the said sympathizers will ban anyone who dares speak up against Ctwd.
What happened to democracy and free speech I and my father before me fought for ?
Users on here shout about freedom of speech when it suits them but once again OLM and co show how biased they really are.
Click to expand...

you cant win by questioning the status quo.
best just to let the ****s call you a **** and let them feel superior.
 
originallambrettaman said:
<laugh> You're a prime example of someone who is anti-CTWD that's still allowed to post, you clown shoe.
Click to expand...

I notice that the playground hasn't come up with anything new.

#boring

hmm I guess I'd rather be called a ****, I know what a **** is - but what exactly is a clown shoe?
 
originallambrettaman said:
We can't ban someone simply because we don't agree with them and as I've already stated(and you've conveniently ignored), nobody has ever been banned for being anti-CTWD, or for simply having a different opinion to anyone else. To get banned, you need to consistently disrupt threads by posting pointless nonsense, contributing nothing constructive and irritating a large amount of other users.
Click to expand...

There are a lot of useless posts on here, you just need to look up at some regular posters who do nothing but disrupt or argue or call posters names to get a reaction, yet these posters are allowed to get away with it because they appear to be backing Ctwd . I cannot see how you can say someone post ****e and allow some of the regulars to get away with it as surely this makes Mods look biased, however as someone has already said I can't upset the status quo can I ?
I see on another thread that a user has put me down on a list of users who posts rumours, can I ask for him to be banned by your criteria as he is clearly lying and has obviously not read my 13 posts before deciding on his stupid statement.PROBABLY NOT I THINK
 
jjon said:
There are a lot of useless posts on here, you just need to look up at some regular posters who do nothing but disrupt or argue or call posters names to get a reaction, yet these posters are allowed to get away with it because they appear to be backing Ctwd . I cannot see how you can say someone post ****e and allow some of the regulars to get away with it as surely this makes Mods look biased, however as someone has already said I can't upset the status quo can I ?
I see on another thread that a user has put me down on a list of users who posts rumours, can I ask for him to be banned by your criteria as he is clearly lying and has obviously not read my 13 posts before deciding on his stupid statement.PROBABLY NOT I THINK
Click to expand...

Man up
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back