Cabral

It's been handled atrociously and it does seem to me that Margaret Byrne has to shoulder most if not all of the responsibility. We both know though that the actions of a few gets the whole club judged - see horse punchers, club funerals etc.

Yes, if Palace can be as bad in the next 10 games as they have in the last 10 then we have a chance to catch them. I'd love nothing more than 3 NE clubs in the top league next year.


Actually, tha Anders Breivik **** is in the news at the minute. Seems he thinks that his games console and internet access isn't enough and breaches his human rights. He has more than I have, I can't even afford an Xbox <laugh>
JC - the point is MB was in a position of responsibility - not an alcoholic idiot
But real outside chance of Palace being the unexpected club going down - :1980_boogie_down:
 
JC - the point is MB wad in a position of responsibility - not an alcoholic idiot
But real outside chance of Palace being the unexpected club going down - :1980_boogie_down:
That's true mate - I'm loathe to criticise an entire club based on the actions of a few, no matter how high up the club has put them. Understandable that that's what many media outlets will do though.
 
True
That's true mate - I'm loathe to criticise an entire club based on the actions of a few, no matter how high up the club has put them. Understandable that that's what many media outlets will do though.
Too true but the issue reflects badly on the game of football & all teams/ players etc
 
Doesn't reflect too well on Sunderland. Got rid of a reserve player (we all know what 'mutual consent' means) on the back of an accusation yet Adam Johnson continued to play and even briefly captained you right up until the guilty plea. Who the **** makes the decisions at the top of your club?!

Isn't Pappis Cisse still playing for your club even though it was revealed that he made a 13 year old child pregnant?
 
As far as I'm aware that was just an allegation made in a newspaper? Unless you're privy to something that the general population isn't I don't really see your point?

I think it was a hell of a lot more than that. No charges were ever brought though, but that does not excuse NUFC for continuing to play him.
 
I think it was a hell of a lot more than that. No charges were ever brought though, but that does not excuse NUFC for continuing to play him.
Specifically, what?

I find this a fairly astonishing stance given that you backed Sunderland playing Johnson even when he confessed to kissing a 15 year old, simply because he intended to plead not guilty.
 
Specifically, what?

I find this a fairly astonishing stance given that you backed Sunderland playing Johnson even when he confessed to kissing a 15 year old, simply because he intended to plead not guilty.

That is not true...What I did say is that I will wait to hear what comes out in the trial before passing any moral judgement.
 
Doesn't reflect too well on Sunderland. Got rid of a reserve player (we all know what 'mutual consent' means) on the back of an accusation yet Adam Johnson continued to play and even briefly captained you right up until the guilty plea. Who the **** makes the decisions at the top of your club?!


people in glass houses, lets talk about CISSY aand the other pervers at your club
 
Specifically, what?

I find this a fairly astonishing stance given that you backed Sunderland playing Johnson even when he confessed to kissing a 15 year old, simply because he intended to plead not guilty.
What do you know about " The kiss " , could have been explained to Byrne as a peck on the cheek .
What " Texts " was Byrne privy to seeing when she made her decision to re instate .
Byrne 's biggest guilt is being overan by other parties and their lawyers .
Very little will come of anything with Byrne , nor Sunderland from here re: Johnson , except for the peanut gallery " Gotcha " posters pretending there in the loop .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger
What do you know about " The kiss " , could have been explained to Byrne as a peck on the cheek .
What " Texts " was Byrne privy to seeing when she made her decision to re instate .
Byrne 's biggest guilt is being overan by other parties and their lawyers .
Very little will come of anything with Byrne , nor Sunderland from here re: Johnson , except for the peanut gallery " Gotcha " posters pretending there in the loop .
The facts are that she had the transcript of the text conversations and unless you've been living under a rock you know what was in them.

From a moral standpoint, her decision not to uphold Johnson's suspension is frankly disgusting. As proven by the club's correct decision to relieve her of her duties.

As for your last point, I have no interest in point scoring whatsoever. If there are people who can't see when something is far more important than football then that's a huge issue for them, but not for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dispicable_Tel
The facts are that she had the transcript of the text conversations and unless you've been living under a rock you know what was in them.

From a moral standpoint, her decision not to uphold Johnson's suspension is frankly disgusting. As proven by the club's correct decision to relieve her of her duties.
I think she relieved herself from duties ...... Wrong again
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger