Bursaspor Hypocrites
- Thread starter Medro
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
**** me. this is getting scary now. someone phone the polis to the SQA building down at Robertson Street before a massacre breaks out
More cliche ridden answers Nev
I like arguing Venom, it's as simple as that.
Fair enough. I used to enjoy a good argument on here now I just abuse people and leave instead. It's so much easier.
I used to enjoy a good argument on here now I just abuse people and leave instead. It's so much easier.
I can't do that.
You still struggling to comprehend the basics of grammar I see? Looks like my lessons went to waste on you. Sadly though I did suspect that would be the outcome.
Please explain to the others exactly what is wrong with that sentence, I dares ya.
Oh FFs you do make me laugh DickAdvocate, I was questioning your ability to tell Medro to look up a dictionary when you slated me (in a previous post)for alledgedly doing so!!You are indeed a nugget!!
Exactly my point.
Ah you remember this thread then.
Any chance you';ll answer my question as to why you think they are hypocrites - you know the title of the thread. or will you just ignore the question as usual?
Exactly my point.
You don't make any points, just a series of stupid statements with no real evidence to back up the grandoise theories that spring out of said statements. As Anp asked, how exactly are Bursaspor "hypocrites"?
They got Miller on the cheap and put in a series of bids for Whittaker which were said to be well below his valuation.
Get it now?
Get it now?
Rangers, his employers who value him.
Like I suspected
1. One who argues against a cause or position, not as a committed opponent but simply for the sake of argument or to determine the validity of the cause or position.
Rangers, his employers who value him.
Like I suspected
1. One who argues against a cause or position, not as a committed opponent but simply for the sake of argument or to determine the validity of the cause or position.
http://sport.stv.tv/football/scotti...-issue-steven-whittaker-ultimatum-to-rangers/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...resh-600k-Bursaspor-bid-Steven-Whittaker.html
£600k for a player on £8k a week and with a year to run on his contract? Sounds about right, certainly not derisory.
What was Rangers offer for Miller who is reportedly on £45k a week with 2 years to run on his current contract?
Their first bid was around the £400k mark, for 1 of our best players last season. Stop being a clown an arguing for the sake of arguing.
They went in with a pitiful offer and then bark at Rangers for trying to get Miller back on the cheap.