British Politics spam thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I still think Reform win the next GE but this result isn't that surprising. Its not been a good few months for them.

- 5m mystery donation
- Stance on the Iran war
- "Rage" which resulted in innocent people having their houses burned down
- Bringing in Jenkins (I once saw an interview where he has bigging up how many people he got into hotels and Braverman. Absolute rotten politicians.
- Kenyon, was a ****ing idiot.

Seems the restore vote didn't mean anything and shows that twitter, is far removed from the feelings of the general population.

Let's hope the leadership change happens quickly for the sake of the country. I don't know much about Burnham tbh, he seems more likeable than Starmer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HRH Custard VC
Burnham had very little 'Labour' in his campaign. If anything, he was distancing himself as far as possible from the current regime, even though his policies are even worse. The vote was 'not Starmer' rather than pro Angry Andy, who has failed whenever he's been in Parliament.

There is no mystery about the donation, just poor press reporting.

The stance on the Iran 'war' was the same as Starmer ended up doing anyway. It's left the Iranian people suffering, and their lives are a projection of one possible future for the UK.

The so called 'rage' was a result of government policy. It's basically accusing people of being easily lead to try to blame Farage, who actually said 'cold rage' which has a specific definition.

The media are terrified anyone other than the tame uniparty gets in.

Burnham has a lot of skeletons, not just his grooming gang cover ups, but also his waste of £100 million on failed clean air schemes, and passing contracts to his wife and friends.
He's already flip flopped on key issues. Manchester relied on huge bail outs, and still has massive debt and inequality. He spends beyond his means, so expect Starmer on steroids.

The Manchester mayoral elections could be interesting, given the local election results there.

Starmer is desperate to stay in the spotlight, so this is going to get very messy. It's not good for the Country.

If Angry Burnham is the answer, it shows just how daft the question has become. And to think, people on here were telling us how great life would be under Labour, and ignored all the evidence posted to the contrary, which has turned out to be true.


The lefty response to this will be will be along the lines of 'raging' etc.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Easter Road 1980 and lr22
lr22 said:
I still think Reform win the next GE but this result isn't that surprising. Its not been a good few months for them.

- 5m mystery donation
- Stance on the Iran war
- "Rage" which resulted in innocent people having their houses burned down
- Bringing in Jenkins (I once saw an interview where he has bigging up how many people he got into hotels and Braverman. Absolute rotten politicians.
- Kenyon, was a ****ing idiot.

Seems the restore vote didn't mean anything and shows that twitter, is far removed from the feelings of the general population.

Let's hope the leadership change happens quickly for the sake of the country. I don't know much about Burnham tbh, he seems more likeable than Starmer.
Click to expand...
a party that started 4 months ago that gets either media blackout or condemnation, getting 7% in a turbo spastic labour NPC gulag, its actually pretty good

makerfield is what seems far removed, not restore
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toley Fart
theres nothing you can do anyway, the masses of the country are contaminated, brown and low IQ

they will eat literal **** on instruction from the marxist state, starmer could pardon saville, snort coke, **** underage ukranian rentboys and launder billions in stolen tax money with zelensky, push the most orwellian anti privacy, anti freedom laws of all time, and generally look and behave like a robotic psychopath, and they will still do exactly what the state tells them

the only thing you can do is try to get off the island before youre no longer allowed to leave
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toley Fart, Easter Road 1980 and stopmeandslapme
DMD said:
Burnham had very little 'Labour' in his campaign. If anything, he was distancing himself as far as possible from the current regime, even though his policies are even worse. The vote was 'not Starmer' rather than pro Angry Andy, who has failed whenever he's been in Parliament.

There is no mystery about the donation, just poor press reporting.

The stance on the Iran 'war' was the same as Starmer ended up doing anyway. It's left the Iranian people suffering, and their lives are a projection of one possible future for the UK.

The so called 'rage' was a result of government policy. It's basically accusing people of being easily lead to try to blame Farage, who actually said 'cold rage' which has a specific definition.

The media are terrified anyone other than the tame uniparty gets in.

Burnham has a lot of skeletons, not just his grooming gang cover ups, but also his waste of £100 million on failed clean air schemes, and passing contracts to his wife and friends.
He's already flip flopped on key issues. Manchester relied on huge bail outs, and still has massive debt and inequality. He spends beyond his means, so expect Starmer on steroids.

The Manchester mayoral elections could be interesting, given the local election results there.

Starmer is desperate to stay in the spotlight, so this is going to get very messy. It's not good for the Country.

If Angry Burnham is the answer, it shows just how daft the question has become. And to think, people on here were telling us how great life would be under Labour, and ignored all the evidence posted to the contrary, which has turned out to be true.


The lefty response to this will be will be along the lines of 'raging' etc.
Click to expand...
A party political broadcast from the Reform party.
Who’d have thought it, from our very own apolitical poster <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: pompeymeowth
DMD said:
Burnham had very little 'Labour' in his campaign. If anything, he was distancing himself as far as possible from the current regime, even though his policies are even worse. The vote was 'not Starmer' rather than pro Angry Andy, who has failed whenever he's been in Parliament.

There is no mystery about the donation, just poor press reporting.

The stance on the Iran 'war' was the same as Starmer ended up doing anyway. It's left the Iranian people suffering, and their lives are a projection of one possible future for the UK.

The so called 'rage' was a result of government policy. It's basically accusing people of being easily lead to try to blame Farage, who actually said 'cold rage' which has a specific definition.

The media are terrified anyone other than the tame uniparty gets in.

Burnham has a lot of skeletons, not just his grooming gang cover ups, but also his waste of £100 million on failed clean air schemes, and passing contracts to his wife and friends.
He's already flip flopped on key issues. Manchester relied on huge bail outs, and still has massive debt and inequality. He spends beyond his means, so expect Starmer on steroids.

The Manchester mayoral elections could be interesting, given the local election results there.

Starmer is desperate to stay in the spotlight, so this is going to get very messy. It's not good for the Country.

If Angry Burnham is the answer, it shows just how daft the question has become. And to think, people on here were telling us how great life would be under Labour, and ignored all the evidence posted to the contrary, which has turned out to be true.


The lefty response to this will be will be along the lines of 'raging' etc.
Click to expand...
^Raving^
 
DMD said:
The lefties don't debate, as you can see from their recent replies. People like yourself pop up every now and again and offer little meaningful, so you're liable to get lumped in with them until you show you're different.

Why not try posting your political views rather than some vague opinion of the site and see how you go.
Click to expand...
As I was saying. :emoticon-0136-giggl
 
  • Like
Reactions: Easter Road 1980 and Benvenuto Cellini
makerfield is 97% white, couldnt make it up

of course theyre still in their liberal ivory tower

that just isnt going to be reflective of 90% of the country now

everywhere diversity has infected, the lower class whites will be reform NPCs or restore
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toley Fart and Easter Road 1980
Benvenuto Cellini said:
theres nothing you can do anyway, the masses of the country are contaminated, brown and low IQ

they will eat literal **** on instruction from the marxist state, starmer could pardon saville, snort coke, **** underage ukranian rentboys and launder billions in stolen tax money with zelensky, push the most orwellian anti privacy, anti freedom laws of all time, and generally look and behave like a robotic psychopath, and they will still do exactly what the state tells them

the only thing you can do is try to get off the island before youre no longer allowed to leave
Click to expand...
*****s like you should stop typing their annoyance and do something about it.

Instead, you are buying veranda fireworks for the annual Sevco implosion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toley Fart
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back