Brexit Vote

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Public Vote

  • No Deal

    Votes: 10 28.6%

  • May's Deal

    Votes: 2 5.7%

  • Remain in the EU

    Votes: 20 57.1%

  • Shoot Mogg's in the Bolloxs (The don't care vote)

    Votes: 3 8.6%
  • Total voters
    35
Commachio said:
You forget there was one in 1990/1?

easy forgotten history for most of you
Click to expand...

You said 'forgotten' not us, i merely asked what you meant. As i was talking about WMD - i don't see why i would be referring specifically in that conversation to the First or Persian. I know it might be close to your heart, but it wasn't what the conversation was about.
 
brb said:
You said 'forgotten' not us, i merely asked what you meant. As i was talking about WMD - i don't see why i would be referring specifically in that conversation to the First or Persian. I know it might be close to your heart, but it wasn't what the conversation was about.
Click to expand...

Thats the hazard of me not following these threads mate
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
PleaseNotPoll said:
You had a say, as you had the option to vote in the preceding general election.

The idea that an additional vote is overriding democracy is patently absurd.
The Brexit referendum wasn't democracy, though. One side cheated and actually did override democracy.
Why aren't you up in arms about that?
Click to expand...

Why can't you accept someone else's opinion, i've already stated clearly to Tobes my reason why i voted, which is contrary to your opinions on cheating. A reasoning i've explained countless times over the last two and half years. People are allowed opinions different to yours!

And as Duncs has asked how many more votes will be suffice for you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DUNCAN DONUTS
brb said:
Why can't you accept someone else's opinion, i've already stated clearly to Tobes my reason why i voted, which is contrary to your opinions on cheating. A reasoning i've explained countless times over the last two and half years. People are allowed opinions different to yours!

And as Duncs has asked how many more votes will be suffice for you?
Click to expand...
You're allowed your opinion. I'm allowed to disagree with it and point out the inconsistencies.
Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from contradiction.

Democracy doesn't end. One referendum doesn't suddenly kill it.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36306681
"In a 52-48 referendum this would be unfinished business by a long way." - Nigel Farage.
You must log in or register to see media
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
You're allowed your opinion. I'm allowed to disagree with it and point out the inconsistencies.
Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from contradiction.

Democracy doesn't end. One referendum doesn't suddenly kill it.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36306681
"In a 52-48 referendum this would be unfinished business by a long way." - Nigel Farage.
You must log in or register to see media
Click to expand...

Inconsistencies, what would they be that my voting reasons don't fit with the general narratives, yet they get tarred with the general narratives. And that's been the problem all along. People assume why you voted, you must be racist, you must be right wing, you must be stupid, you want people to be poorer, you want people to suffer, the list is endless. It's like if you denounce something enough, you will get your own way. But then getting your own way is based on it's own lies, lies that didn't fit with why i actually voted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back